Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 26

Thread: Images and copyright

  1. #1
    A Straw? And Fruit? Bazzlad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Big Rhesus House Stourbridge
    Posts
    3,072
    Thanks
    90
    Thanked
    78 times in 44 posts

    Images and copyright

    Quick Q.

    I take an image, from the web, and edit it. Heavily enough so that you can't tell it's what it originally was.
    Can I use it legally?

  2. #2
    Does he need a reason? Funkstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    19,874
    Thanks
    629
    Thanked
    962 times in 813 posts
    • Funkstar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83GHz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB OCZ PC2-6400C5 800MHz Quad Channel
      • Storage:
      • 650GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB ATI Radeon HD4550
      • PSU:
      • Antec 350W 80+ Efficient PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec NSK1480 Slim Mini Desktop Case
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407 + 2408 monitors
      • Internet:
      • Zen 8mb
    no, don't think so as it is still based on the original work. Whether you can prove that is another point entirely.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    Indeed, it is illegal. Depends on the copyright status of the photo though, I'm not sure if they have to explicitly state the copyright or what.

  4. #4
    A Straw? And Fruit? Bazzlad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Big Rhesus House Stourbridge
    Posts
    3,072
    Thanks
    90
    Thanked
    78 times in 44 posts
    I found this quote:

    "this means - if you've taken an image and edited it sufficiently away from the original - it's a new piece of work"

  5. #5
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    That's dependant on the copyright status of the image as far as I'm aware.

  6. #6
    Tech-ignorant Factoid
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    2,904
    Thanks
    417
    Thanked
    114 times in 80 posts
    Well, somebody is quite clearly wrong here.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Elyk View Post
    Well, somebody is quite clearly wrong here.
    No, it's dependant on the copyright. So both can be correct.

  8. #8
    Tech-ignorant Factoid
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    2,904
    Thanks
    417
    Thanked
    114 times in 80 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kezzer View Post
    No, it's dependant on the copyright. So both can be correct.
    But not for the same pic, right?

  9. #9
    Flat cap, Whippets, Cave. Clunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    11,056
    Thanks
    360
    Thanked
    725 times in 459 posts
    He meant himself
    Quote Originally Posted by Blitzen View Post
    stupid betond belief.
    You owe it to yourself to click here really.

  10. #10
    A Straw? And Fruit? Bazzlad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Big Rhesus House Stourbridge
    Posts
    3,072
    Thanks
    90
    Thanked
    78 times in 44 posts
    arrrrrrrrrgh confusion!

  11. #11
    Tech-ignorant Factoid
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    2,904
    Thanks
    417
    Thanked
    114 times in 80 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bazzlad View Post
    arrrrrrrrrgh confusion!
    Yes, you have that right

  12. #12
    Senior Member Kezzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,863
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    Well obviously not for the same pic, that's a silly thought hence why I omitted it.

  13. #13
    IBM
    IBM is offline
    there but for the grace of God, go I IBM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    West London
    Posts
    4,187
    Thanks
    149
    Thanked
    244 times in 145 posts
    • IBM's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5K Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Intel E6600 Core2Duo 2.40GHz
      • Memory:
      • 2x2GB kit (1GBx2), Ballistix 240-pin DIMM, DDR2 PC2-6400
      • Storage:
      • 150G WD SATA 10k RAPTOR, 500GB WD SATA Enterprise
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Leadtek NVIDIA GeForce PX8800GTS 640MB
      • PSU:
      • CORSAIR HX 620W MODULAR PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec P182 Black Case
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407WPF A04
      • Internet:
      • domestic zoom
    I'd say that if you can take a pic and edit it to the point that you can't tell what it was originally, then you're not copying the picture, you're using it as inspiration.....whole 'nuther kettle of fish...
    sig removed by Zak33

  14. #14
    Ғо ѕніzzLє му піzzLє chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    1,576
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked
    52 times in 43 posts
    What is it? What's it for?
    1.21 GIGAWATTS!!!!!

  15. #15
    Comfortably Numb directhex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    /dev/urandom
    Posts
    17,074
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked
    1,026 times in 677 posts
    • directhex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus ROG Strix B550-I Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5900x
      • Memory:
      • 64GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Seagate Firecuda 520
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNOVA 850W G3
      • Case:
      • NZXT H210i
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 20.04, Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 34GN850
      • Internet:
      • FIOS
    if you're using someone else's image and basing something from it, your work is a "derivative work" - and you need to ensure that it's licensed such that you are allowed to do so

    changing it enough that you can't see the original doesn't change that - it just makes you more likely to get away with it.

    but ask yourself this - would you be happy if $megacorp changed one of your images and turned a massive profit from it without even acknowledging the source?

  16. #16
    asphinctersayswhat dannyboy83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hamilton, Scotland
    Posts
    677
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    If you sought permission from the copyright owner, or artist, and it was granted - you're ok.

    At work, I used the old WW2 "talking costs lives" pposters and edited them a bit for a data security poster campaign - I was given the go-ahead by the National Archives.

    My System: Coolermaster Centurion 5 (black) case, Intel E6750 Core2Duo, Tagan Easy-Con 530W, Asus P5B Deluxe WIFI, OCZ 2GB Kit (2x1GB) DDR2 800MHz/PC2-6400 CL 4-4-4-15 PLATINUM XTC, Samsung SpinPoint 200Gb SATA2 / 2 x Maxtor DiamondMax 10 200Gb SATA, 256Mb Sapphire ATI PCI-E X1950PRO, Creative X-Fi Xtreme 7.1, 19" Daewoo W9ZQ Black Widescreen TFT, 4Mb Virgin Cable Broadband (formerly Blueyonder) with Linksys WRT54GL Wireless-G and DD-WRT firmware.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Students Sue Anti-Cheating Service. Your opinions?
    By Fabula in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 02-04-2007, 12:19 PM
  2. Important Announcement Regarding YOUR images
    By shiato storm in forum Consumer Electronics
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 27-04-2006, 08:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •