Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 27

Thread: Another "critique my site" thread

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • Uncle Psychosis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5N-E SLI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Duo E4300
      • Memory:
      • 2GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 8600GT
      • Case:
      • Lian-LI PC7

    Another "critique my site" thread

    Hi guys

    I've been working on this:

    http://www.ph.ed.ac.uk/~s0091155/korfball/index.html

    Constructive criticisms welcome

    I should point out that the navigation on the LHS will be "expandable" to show the navigation within the main sections---at the moment there's a large amount of redundancy within the navigation. The LHS will also have smaller, less important sections added to it as and when necessary, whereas the navigation at the top holds all the "essential" info.

    Sam
    "bother", said Pooh. "There's an infinite number of monkeys at the door wanting to sue A.A.Milne for plagiarism."

  2. #2
    Flat cap, Whippets, Cave. Clunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    11,056
    Thanks
    360
    Thanked
    725 times in 459 posts
    Ok, I know nothing about web design, so I can only tell you what happens on my screen. (1920x1200).

    Quote Originally Posted by Blitzen View Post
    stupid betond belief.
    You owe it to yourself to click here really.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • Uncle Psychosis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5N-E SLI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Duo E4300
      • Memory:
      • 2GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 8600GT
      • Case:
      • Lian-LI PC7
    Hmm. That shouldnt happen...what browser/OS are you using?

    Cheers

    Sam
    Last edited by Uncle Psychosis; 01-07-2007 at 01:19 AM.
    "bother", said Pooh. "There's an infinite number of monkeys at the door wanting to sue A.A.Milne for plagiarism."

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • Uncle Psychosis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5N-E SLI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Duo E4300
      • Memory:
      • 2GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 8600GT
      • Case:
      • Lian-LI PC7
    Hmm. And on IE7 on Vista the image on the RHS doesn't load properly...Great
    "bother", said Pooh. "There's an infinite number of monkeys at the door wanting to sue A.A.Milne for plagiarism."

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tring, Herts
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    7 times in 2 posts
    same problem when viewed 1920x1200, look fine when I minimise.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • Uncle Psychosis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5N-E SLI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Duo E4300
      • Memory:
      • 2GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 8600GT
      • Case:
      • Lian-LI PC7
    Quote Originally Posted by winstainforth View Post
    same problem when viewed 1920x1200, look fine when I minimise.
    Boogar. Must be a problem with the css...

    Does anyone know if IE7 requires the "height" attribue to be specified on an img??

    Sam
    "bother", said Pooh. "There's an infinite number of monkeys at the door wanting to sue A.A.Milne for plagiarism."

  7. #7
    Flat cap, Whippets, Cave. Clunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    11,056
    Thanks
    360
    Thanked
    725 times in 459 posts
    Its firefox on mine.

    If I load it in explorer 6, it looks very similar, only the main picture is a small white rectangle with a coloured line in it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blitzen View Post
    stupid betond belief.
    You owe it to yourself to click here really.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • Uncle Psychosis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5N-E SLI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Duo E4300
      • Memory:
      • 2GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 8600GT
      • Case:
      • Lian-LI PC7
    Ok. I should have fixed those problems now. It seems that IE doesnt like if you dont specify the "height" attribute and I needed to specify "fixed" on the background image.

    Cheers for the help guys

    Sam
    "bother", said Pooh. "There's an infinite number of monkeys at the door wanting to sue A.A.Milne for plagiarism."

  9. #9
    Flat cap, Whippets, Cave. Clunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    11,056
    Thanks
    360
    Thanked
    725 times in 459 posts
    The text is lined up now, but everything is left aligned, and the background carries on til about 3/4 accross the page, and then its solid white for the last 1/4.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blitzen View Post
    stupid betond belief.
    You owe it to yourself to click here really.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • Uncle Psychosis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5N-E SLI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Duo E4300
      • Memory:
      • 2GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 8600GT
      • Case:
      • Lian-LI PC7
    Quote Originally Posted by Clunk View Post
    The text is lined up now, but everything is left aligned, and the background carries on til about 3/4 accross the page, and then its solid white for the last 1/4.
    Thats kind of what its meant to do...The "site" is fixed at 800px wide, but the background continues to 1280px so that not too much of the screen is just whitespace. The main user of the site will probably be on a Uni computer; so either 800x600 for the old **** ones or 1280x1024 for the newer ones. Hadn't counted on you folks with stupidly big screens!

    Sam

    PS does the image load ok in IE now?
    "bother", said Pooh. "There's an infinite number of monkeys at the door wanting to sue A.A.Milne for plagiarism."

  11. #11
    Flat cap, Whippets, Cave. Clunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    11,056
    Thanks
    360
    Thanked
    725 times in 459 posts
    OK, it just looks a bit odd with the white there, thats all.

    One other thing I noticed, the "Latest News" bit has got a scroll bar along the bottom of it, and when you load it up, it defaults to the right so that some of the text is obscured. Maybe a smaller font might get rid of that?
    Quote Originally Posted by Blitzen View Post
    stupid betond belief.
    You owe it to yourself to click here really.

  12. #12
    Spanked Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,430
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    26 times in 23 posts
    The "site" is fixed at 800px wide, but the background continues to 1280px so that not too much of the screen is just whitespace. The main user of the site will probably be on a Uni computer; so either 800x600 for the old **** ones or 1280x1024 for the newer ones.
    You know who your primary target audience is and the screen resolutions used, so in terms of usability it's fine. I use 2048x1536, but I sometimes use 2 browser windows sitting side by side for comparison (1024px wide each) to minimise the effect of having a high resolution.

    This is just a personal preference, completely subjective opinion, but when writing a 600px wide body, I like to center it (as opposed to having it left aligned) and have the whitespace, background colour, or gradient graphic on either side.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • Uncle Psychosis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5N-E SLI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Duo E4300
      • Memory:
      • 2GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 8600GT
      • Case:
      • Lian-LI PC7
    Quote Originally Posted by ACiD303 View Post
    This is just a personal preference, completely subjective opinion, but when writing a 600px wide body, I like to center it (as opposed to having it left aligned) and have the whitespace, background colour, or gradient graphic on either side.
    Yeah, thats what I'd done originally but I thought it didn't look quite right! I'm still unsure on that one, so I'll maybe have a play with it!

    Clunk---you're right, the "latest" box needs a bit of work. I haven't really decided how that box will be used yet; I need to work out if the actual news will go in it or whether it'll just be a link to the latest news

    Sam
    "bother", said Pooh. "There's an infinite number of monkeys at the door wanting to sue A.A.Milne for plagiarism."

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,011
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked
    14 times in 13 posts
    • Craig321's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 Pro
      • CPU:
      • i7 2600k
      • Memory:
      • 4x 4GB Corsair XMS3 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 120GB OCZ Vertex 3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX480 1536MB
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair HX
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define R3
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2410
    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Psychosis View Post
    Hi guys

    I've been working on this:

    http://www.ph.ed.ac.uk/~s0091155/korfball/index.html

    Constructive criticisms welcome

    I should point out that the navigation on the LHS will be "expandable" to show the navigation within the main sections---at the moment there's a large amount of redundancy within the navigation. The LHS will also have smaller, less important sections added to it as and when necessary, whereas the navigation at the top holds all the "essential" info.

    Sam
    Looks good, but you should separate the text from the navigation a bit more. Maybe make it so the text goes straight down rather than boxing in the nav.

    Craig.

  15. #15
    Purple Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    1,814
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    29 times in 22 posts
    • Tarffie's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit IP-35 Pro
      • CPU:
      • Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 2gb Crucial Ballistix Tracer DDR2 (PC2-8500C5)
      • Storage:
      • 250gb + 500gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 8800GT 512mb w/ Accelero S1
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX620
      • Case:
      • Antec P182
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2408wfp & 2405fpw
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 50Mb/s
    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Psychosis View Post
    Thats kind of what its meant to do...The "site" is fixed at 800px wide, but the background continues to 1280px so that not too much of the screen is just whitespace. The main user of the site will probably be on a Uni computer; so either 800x600 for the old **** ones or 1280x1024 for the newer ones. Hadn't counted on you folks with stupidly big screens!

    Sam

    PS does the image load ok in IE now?
    Easy way to solve that, just change:

    Code:
    background: #ffffff url(../assets/pagebackground.gif) 0% 0% fixed repeat-y;
    to
    Code:
    background: #404568 url(../assets/pagebackground.gif) 0% 0% fixed repeat-y;
    The purple will just carry on then. Speaking of which, crop pagebackground.gif to 1px high, it'd look no different but the filesize would be ~500 bytes rather than 40kb.

    I think you need to change the text/vertical navigation set up, having the text flow underneath throws the whole thing off balance a bit. It'd look better if you kept the text going straight down in one column, there's be less empty space directly underneath, too.

    Limit the entries in the Latest News box so you don't get a scroll bar. It's meant to be latest news so you don't need that many anyway. Citigroup logo should be smaller than your site title, it's dominating the header. Plus it's got artifacting from saving for web.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    68
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • Uncle Psychosis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5N-E SLI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Duo E4300
      • Memory:
      • 2GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 8600GT
      • Case:
      • Lian-LI PC7
    Quote Originally Posted by Tarffie View Post
    Easy way to solve that, just change:

    Code:
    background: #ffffff url(../assets/pagebackground.gif) 0% 0% fixed repeat-y;
    to
    Code:
    background: #404568 url(../assets/pagebackground.gif) 0% 0% fixed repeat-y;
    K, thanks

    The purple will just carry on then. Speaking of which, crop pagebackground.gif to 1px high, it'd look no different but the filesize would be ~500 bytes rather than 40kb.
    K. I'd been told that having small background images like that can choke some browsers...but I can make it smaller still, I think.

    I think you need to change the text/vertical navigation set up, having the text flow underneath throws the whole thing off balance a bit. It'd look better if you kept the text going straight down in one column, there's be less empty space directly underneath, too.
    K, I'll fix that today.

    Limit the entries in the Latest News box so you don't get a scroll bar. It's meant to be latest news so you don't need that many anyway. Citigroup logo should be smaller than your site title, it's dominating the header. Plus it's got artifacting from saving for web.
    Yeah, I was beginning to think that myself.

    Cheers!
    "bother", said Pooh. "There's an infinite number of monkeys at the door wanting to sue A.A.Milne for plagiarism."

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Idea for a new thread (but not the thread itself)
    By MSIC in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-08-2006, 04:02 PM
  2. Thread Rating
    By XTR in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 24-07-2003, 03:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •