Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 33 to 48 of 66

Thread: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

  1. #33
    HEXUS.social member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,562
    Thanks
    102
    Thanked
    320 times in 213 posts

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Did wonder if there were still any F14s about. I'm pretty certain I read something that it would be used for CAS and therefore a direct replacement for the A10 (Harriers also have the same role).

    Just read in the Times today that MoD does not reckon the JSF will be ready for the new carriers in 2014. Personally, I doubt the carriers will be ready by then either, so it should cancel out nicely!

    Also read that wiki link a little bit. The last entry sounded interesting. Energy directed weapons a possibility, like soild state lasers!

  2. #34
    Welcome to stampytown! Salazaar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oxford-ish
    Posts
    4,459
    Thanks
    505
    Thanked
    353 times in 254 posts
    • Salazaar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock B450m Steel Legend
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5 3600
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 5700 XT

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Quote Originally Posted by Optical668 View Post
    I doubt the A10 will be replace for some time as its more of a CAS (Close Air Support) Aircraft for ground forces.
    Surely the MQ-9 Reaper will do that job? It's already made it's first kills in Afghanistan! This is the same plane the government want patrolling the skies over the 2012 Olympics!
    ____
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  3. #35
    Senior Member Dreaming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Leicester / York
    Posts
    1,503
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked
    40 times in 30 posts
    • Dreaming's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit IP35 Pro
      • CPU:
      • e6300 @ 2.8ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4gb Corsair XMS2 PC6400
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Western Digital for OS + 1500GB Seagate for Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • BFG 8800GTS OC2 320MB
      • PSU:
      • Antec Neo HE 550
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC A05B
      • Operating System:
      • Windows Vista Home Premium x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 22" 226BW
      • Internet:
      • NTL 4Mb/s

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Heh sometimes I think I secretly want to be a pilot because every night before I go to sleep without fail I imagine flying a plane in a clear sky miles above the ground. Sorry, my 2p . Childhood dreams *sigh*.

    My favourite is the tornado
    Dreaming

    C2D E6300 @ 2.8 | | Abit IP35 Pro | | 4GB Corsair XMS2 800 | | BFG 8800GTS OC2 320MB | | 500GB Western Digital for OS + 1500GB Seagate for Storage | | Antec NeoHE 550 | | Lian Li PC A05B | | Samsung 226BW 22"

  4. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    99
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    so much money on killing!

  5. #37
    Demonizing
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Bristol, UK
    Posts
    318
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    6 times in 6 posts
    • Optical668's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Intel Purebreed Masterboard
      • CPU:
      • 80,000 GHZ Flux Capacitor
      • Memory:
      • Six Hundred and Sixty Six Megs of Ramming Speed
      • Storage:
      • Western Digital Powerdrive Ten Thousand Terabytes
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 88 Thousand Supercard
      • PSU:
      • Nuclear Fussion Core Reactor 1.21 gigawatts
      • Case:
      • Akasa 62 Reactor Housing
      • Monitor(s):
      • 100" Iiyama LCD
      • Internet:
      • OC-768 40,000 Mbit/s

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Quote Originally Posted by Salazaar View Post
    Surely the MQ-9 Reaper will do that job? It's already made it's first kills in Afghanistan! This is the same plane the government want patrolling the skies over the 2012 Olympics!
    I think theres a serious lack of weapons armament bewteen the two aircraft. The A10 can carry rockets, bombs, missiles & its got a 30mm fart cannon is well. The AC-130 Spectre Gunship is a more likly aircraft that would replace the A10.
    Hell and Fire was spawned to be released.

  6. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    12,197
    Thanks
    913
    Thanked
    605 times in 424 posts

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    AC-130 would be too big and slow I would of thought, the A-10 is excellent at its job as were the other aircraft in the list I made, its just a differnet world these days...

  7. #39
    Senior Member Stringent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Neverland
    Posts
    5,227
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    155 times in 117 posts
    • Stringent's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Intel DQ57TM
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 760
      • Memory:
      • 8GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA Geforce 260GTX
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX620
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Centurion
      • Operating System:
      • Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dual Iiyama 24"
      • Internet:
      • Patchy

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Can't beat a Warhawk ...

  8. #40
    Welcome to stampytown! Salazaar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oxford-ish
    Posts
    4,459
    Thanks
    505
    Thanked
    353 times in 254 posts
    • Salazaar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock B450m Steel Legend
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5 3600
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 5700 XT

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Quote Originally Posted by [GSV]Trig View Post
    AC-130 would be too big and slow I would of thought, the A-10 is excellent at its job as were the other aircraft in the list I made, its just a differnet world these days...
    The A10 never truely managed to fulfil its designed role since the Soviet Union never invade Europe with its millions of tanks. Almost a shame really!
    ____
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  9. #41
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Quote Originally Posted by Salazaar View Post
    The A10 never truely managed to fulfil its designed role since the Soviet Union never invade Europe with its millions of tanks. Almost a shame really!
    Yeah, pity that.

  10. #42
    Senior Member Betty_Swallocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Feet up, spliff lit.
    Posts
    1,140
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked
    60 times in 44 posts
    • Betty_Swallocks's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z97-A
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 4690K o/c to 4.6 gHz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 256Gb SSD + 1320Gb (3x SATA drives)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI R9 390 8Gb
      • PSU:
      • Corsair CS750M
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Shark
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 37" Samsung TV @1920x1080 + Dell 20.1" TFT secondary screen
      • Internet:
      • 150Mb Virgin Media cable

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Well lets hope the F35 is better than the monstrosity they put in BF2. You could get shot down by the UAVs it was so rubbish.

    I used to work on Harriers back in the '80s when I was stationed in Germany. I actually had a flight in one of the T4 two seaters. Absolutely unbelievable experience.

    It was like the best rollercoaster ride in the world multiplied by about a million. I so envy the guys who fly these things every day.

    It infuriated me the way that we, as usual, took short term economics over long term manufacturing capablity and just basically gave the Yanks our unique aircraft just because they promised to let us build some of it. Our aircraft industry was the best in the world at one time but now we've given almost all of it up.

    At one time we would have been able to build the Typhoon all by ourselves rather than having to share it with 3 other nations.

  11. #43
    HEXUS.social member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,562
    Thanks
    102
    Thanked
    320 times in 213 posts

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Quote Originally Posted by Betty_Swallocks View Post
    At one time we would have been able to build the Typhoon all by ourselves rather than having to share it with 3 other nations.
    That would have made life a lot easier. As it is, there's a lot of comprimises that had to be made so all nations are happy. For example, Germany has to have a fire extinguisher on theirs, but we don't. We have pins in our ejections seats (there's a handle at the side that does the same job), but the other 3 nations don't. It just goes like that, lots of little comprimises. However, I heard (no doubt a rumour) that UK Typhoons are superior when it comes to EW as BAE hasn't shared some of the ECM stuff.

  12. #44
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    571
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked
    11 times in 10 posts
    • Fatboy40's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus A8N-E
      • CPU:
      • A64 X2 4200+ @ 2420 MHz
      • Memory:
      • 2GB
      • Storage:
      • 200GB SATA
      • Graphics card(s):
      • PNY 8800 GTS 320 - 648 ROP/1512 Shader/1053 Mem
      • PSU:
      • 400w Enermax
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro x86
      • Monitor(s):
      • 17" Acer Flat Screen

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Quote Originally Posted by Optical668 View Post
    All blown away by this...

    Image:MiG-31 Firefox.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    ... if it was real
    I'm not fat and I'm not 40

    Quote Originally Posted by JPreston View Post
    I'm pretty disappointed that in the 21st century so much human endeavour and industry is still devoted to ascertaining whose imaginary sky-fairy is best...

  13. #45
    Senior Member retroborg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    680
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    19 times in 13 posts

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    After giving it a 2nd thought, the original opinion on the F-35 might be flawed.
    One should not believe the superiority of the craft so quickly, there was serious reliability concerns due the complex nature of pivoting engine jet, it’s significantly cheaper than the F22 for a reason, although the manufacturing process is amazingly efficient. From an air defence point of view 30 very good planes are better than 8 excellent ones.

    In my opinion the F22 still has the edge in terms of air superiority, but even the F22 was outclassed in some areas by the YF-23 blackwidow (cancelled project). Stealth is great for bombing and tactical strikes but when it comes to dog fights stealth planes aren't invincible.

    The F-35 (whenever it comes out), regardless technology which is incredible, it is not an A/A oriented fighter. F-35 will be like F16-18 (=multi-role), while F-22 is like F-14-15 (=A/A). In a dogfight of the same generation, A/A has a big advantage over multi-role.

    In other words, in a dog-fight situation the F-35 against & the F-22 and the following Russian prototypes:
    Mig-35
    Sukhoi Su-47 Berkut (S-37)
    Sukhoi Su-37

    All that stealth and high-tech the F-35 is carrying wont mean jack-squat and it would end up in flames before you know it!

    That simple!

    Su-37 performing the Cobra manoeuvre.


    S-37

  14. #46
    HEXUS.social member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,562
    Thanks
    102
    Thanked
    320 times in 213 posts

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Stealth is overated. Most modern radars have little trouble picking up these aircraft, maybe at a slightly reduced range, but still outside missile range. It's only because we've been using them against countries that that use old second-hand radars that they've been effective. We were happily tracking the F117s in the Gulf Wars, much to the annoyance of the Americans!

    The current effectiveness of aircraft is measuered against the Mig35. Using simulations, I believe the figures for kills/deaths were (when I last read it a couple of years ago): -
    F22 9:1
    Typhoon 4.5:1
    Rafale 1:1
    F15/16/18 < 1:1

    The F22 was designed as an air dominance fighter, but it is relatively easy to convert it to multi-role just by sticking a TIALD pod and some bombs on it. The Typhoon is the same. Originally designed to intercept Soviet bombers, when the threat was gone, they decided make it multi-role by allowing it carry AG weapons. It should still have the same charactistics as it's original dogfighter design, just changed the software to allow the extra weapons.

  15. #47
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,044
    Thanks
    1,881
    Thanked
    3,382 times in 2,718 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Quote Originally Posted by retroborg View Post
    One should not believe the superiority of the craft so quickly, there was serious reliability concerns due the complex nature of pivoting engine jet, it’s significantly cheaper than the F22 for a reason,
    Are you implying the F35 will be less reliable than the F22 because it's cheaper?

    In my opinion the F22 still has the edge in terms of air superiority, but even the F22 was outclassed in some areas by the YF-23 blackwidow (cancelled project). Stealth is great for bombing and tactical strikes but when it comes to dog fights stealth planes aren't invincible.

    The F-35 (whenever it comes out), regardless technology which is incredible, it is not an A/A oriented fighter. F-35 will be like F16-18 (=multi-role), while F-22 is like F-14-15 (=A/A). In a dogfight of the same generation, A/A has a big advantage over multi-role.

    In other words, in a dog-fight situation the F-35 against & the F-22 and the following Russian prototypes:
    Mig-35
    Sukhoi Su-47 Berkut (S-37)
    Sukhoi Su-37

    All that stealth and high-tech the F-35 is carrying wont mean jack-squat and it would end up in flames before you know it!
    I think Gerrard's figures made the point, but it should be obvious that the F22 isn't just about stealth. It can easily do pointless 'cobra' manouvers if you really wanted to - anything with positively angled vectored thrust and semblance of control at high angle of attack can. Heck even the Eurofighter could probably match the AoA shown in that picture

  16. #48
    Large Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,720
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked
    99 times in 64 posts

    Re: Modern Vertical Takeoff and Landing Fighter Jets

    Yakovlev made an VTOL aircraft some years ago - the YAK-41. I think it only entered service with the Russian military. Wasn't the most successful aircraft ever.
    To err is human. To really foul things up ... you need a computer.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •