Pretty sure that's the camera the chaps I was working on the BRIT awards website with had for the show photographs. They had 4 of themOriginally Posted by Rave
Canon
Olympus
Nikon
Pentax
Fuji
Casio
Kodak
Konica / Minolta
Sony
Other (Samsung, Praktica, etc please specify in reply)
Pretty sure that's the camera the chaps I was working on the BRIT awards website with had for the show photographs. They had 4 of themOriginally Posted by Rave
"All our beliefs are being challenged now, and rightfully so, they're stupid." - Bill Hicks
HP PhotoSmart 735.
My other is a Kodak DX4900 Zoom.
Rys
MOLLY AND POPPY!
mine's a dx4900 zooooooom too.
you copied me :/
Yeah, Pro photographers are nuts. The serious news guys usually have a couple of digital bodies just so they don't have to swap lenses. The most expensive camera I ever sold (I think) was an original EOS-1D. The guy just came in, checked it over, and paid the £4300 on his credit card . He didn't want a D60 as it wasn't robust enough. Nobody (in the news field at least) works with film any more, even back when a 2 megapixel Kodak modified EOS-1N or F-5 was £8k the papers could make the money back in a few months with the time and money they saved not having to process films.Originally Posted by DaBeeeenster
The EOS-1DS is extraordinarily good, I didn't give it all that much of a test for obvious reasons but from what I saw you'd struggle to get equivalent quality from 35mm film unless you were using Velvia or Provia 100F.
I don't do much photography any more (too lazy) but I'll use film until I can't get it any more, for much the same reason as I prefer vinyl to CD- it might not be technically better but it has an intangible quality which digital can't (yet) replicate.
Rich :¬)
As soon as you find a way for me to acquire the funding, and convince the Domestic Finance Manager (wife) that it's justified spending that kind of wedge, I'll be at the shop doing so. But I'm not holding my breath - especially re: convincing the DFM - 'cos she was recently making noises about moving houseOriginally Posted by Rave
I don't think I ever tested the EOS-1D. I DID test the Nikon D1 though, which was the same sort of price, and have tested the EOS-D30, D60, 300D and 10D.
To be honest, though, while I use cameras for work and they do make me some money, I'm not a heavy business user and the Olympus 5050 would probably do everything I need for work. Photography is a hobby not a business for me, and if I DID have five or six grand to spend, it'd be £1000 (-ish) on the camera body and the rest on lenses and accessories.
Vinyl? Oh, how 70's. Never catch me doing anything as passe as that.Originally Posted by Rave
me uncrosses fingers behind back
That isn't really a Mitchell Electronic Reference turntable sitting on the shelf over there, and it doesn't have an SME arm and Satin moving coil cartridge, and those several hundred records aren't really there either. Honest!
Originally Posted by Saracen
I'm just about making do with a Bush MTT1 at the moment, it works fine except that the stylus is crud and gives nasty distortion on the inner tracks. I have a Valhalla'ed LP12 in hibernation though, mothballed until I can find a replacement for the A&R Cambridge 77 cartridge; they stopped making replacement styli a couple of years ago. Not the greatest turntable ever but the sound was exactly how I liked it. Now I've got to try and find another cartridge that sounds as good.
The pop as you drop the needle into the lead-in, the thrill of putting a perfectly exposed transparency on the lightbox for the first time....life is sweet.
Rich :¬)
Maybe I'm too much of a purist at heart, but that would make me worry about damage to the LP's that, while the Bush might not show it up, when you dig the Linn out and get it working again, would THEN be all too clear.Originally Posted by Rave
Be careful, mate.
PS. I officially envy you the Linn. Mind you, while it's arguably a better TT than the Mitchell, the Mitchell is a work of Art
PPS. I do have a Linn remote here if that counts - fully programmable job. About £350 worth, IIRC
PPPS. I think we're getting a bit off-topic
Some cheap credit card sized one off ebay. Cost 15 quid and its 640x480, no make but its not bad for its size!
Casio Exilim EX-S2.. Ideal camera for sticking in your pocket ready for any random snaps!
If i was going to get another camera though, I think it would be one of the Canon Ixus models...
Original Canon Ixus - cant even find it on the Canon webby...
2.1 MP and the quality isn't great but it does the needful when necessary.
Canon S30 very impressed with some great manula functions
Also got an S50
The S50 is perfection it fixes all the problems with the S30 and adds all the latest software functions shame the build quality feels slightly worse and that the flash is still miles too bright.
Hmm, I've got a Roksan Xerxes/RB300/Audio-Technica OC9Originally Posted by Saracen
anyone else want to vote if you haven't already?
Join the HEXUS Folding at Home Team!!
Welcome to HEXUS! - Read this if you're new!
hexus trust | joshwaller.co.uk | tea review
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)