OMFG
I take back everything I've said about British drivers. Well, no I don't but...
words fail me.
OMFG
I take back everything I've said about British drivers. Well, no I don't but...
words fail me.
Desktop - i7 930, XMS3 6x2GB DDR3, X58A-UD3R (rev2), 2xHD5870 1GB (CrossFireX), Crucial C300 64GB , 2x2TB WD Caviar Green, Corsair 650TX
Notebook - MacBook Pro 13" i5 Early 2011
My flickr
that's the bit I meant then I said
But actually that's a great bit of cyclepath - it's just used very badly. It does most things right though - it's separate from both the road and the pavement and it allows cycles to move freely and quickly when the traffic is busy. There's a couple of nice bits in Manchester, to be fair, but the majority is just a line 3 ft from the curb that all the motorists ignore...The worst bit on my commute is the section of clearly marked cyclepath that is always full of pedestrians who give you snotty looks for using it on bike, depsite the fact that it is clearly marked as a cyclepath, and there is a dedicated footpath within 5 yards...
The legal requirement to drive for the human visual field (horizontally) is 120º. A normal persons visual field extends usually 200º (horizontally). This in effect means that drivers with a visual defect in their peripheral vision can still drive as long as they meet the reqs. Therefore even *If* the burka did obscure the vision, I would highly doubt it would cause them to have a field loss below 120º.
Also from my limited clinical experience, the burka itself does not impede the vision (and no I have not worn one lol). Infact I have tested the vision in some and have never noticed a characteristic visual field losses in their peripheral vision. So to answer your question a burka will probabily not be the underlying cause but just as the others have said its just the drivers poor skills.
Hmm perhaps an opportunity for a final year project?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)