Not convinced about that bit, I'm afraid. The "no point" bit, I mean.
I'll caveat it by saying I haven't looked for some years, and I do not, any longer, work in London. In fact, I avoid the place like it was hell on earth ('cos in my view, it is) these days. But I worked, and commuted, and bought in the home counties, in the past.
The reason
then was that I could buy in London, and get a pokey flat, or buy outside London and get a four-bedroom house, and even with paying the rail fares, it was still cheaper.
I would also point out that exactly
where you are outside London can make a vast difference to house prices. And extra 15 minutes on the train can chop a hundred grand or more of the price of a similar property. And time on trains is not entirely dead time either. It never was, and in these days of laptops, Kindles, iPads and mobile phones, it certainly isn't. It's an ideal opportunity to relax, catch up, or even get a bit of work done
provided you're prepared to travel at a time when the commuter rush allows this. I was. I was due on the office at 9, but was rarely later than 7 to 7:15 when I got there. So I got a LOT done in that 90 minutes before everyone else arrived. The boss noticed it too, as he often did the same.
But the "point", really, is about what you want. If you like London, if you want the restaurants, theatres, night life, etc, great. If you detest the place (as I do) then the "point" is having a life
outside London, and only going in for work, i.e. when you absolutely have to.