Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: MG Rover

  1. #1
    Not *@!%in Postman Pat! Ruggerbugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Rugby, (England for the Yanks)
    Posts
    1,659
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked
    69 times in 53 posts
    • Ruggerbugger's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus A7N8X-E deluxe
      • CPU:
      • XP 3200+
      • Memory:
      • 1GB Kingston PC3200 DDR2 dual channel
      • Storage:
      • 1 x 40GB OS, 1 x 320GB Data
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire 9800 Pro
      • PSU:
      • 400W Akasa (I think)
      • Case:
      • Antec Super Lanboy
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung LE32 LCD 720p
      • Internet:
      • VM 4Mb

    MG Rover

    After watching the decline of Alstom in my home town, and the kick in the teeth it gave my Dad and hundreds of others, I feel terrible for the guys at MG Rover, and the supply companies.

    I don't want to sound protectionist/isolationist, but when are we going to support our disappearing manufacturing base and highly skilled workers - when we've all got warehouse jobs at Gap?

    Good luck guys, I hope it works out for you.


    Click here for larger versions of photos

    Quote Originally Posted by Gonzo
    my a55 shoots great video in 1080i

  2. #2
    Goat Boy
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Alexandra Park, London
    Posts
    2,428
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Market forces I am afraid mate. Other nations can make better cars, simple as that.

    If you want a stable job, train as a teacher, doctor or nurse.

    I know it's a bit of a hardline, but that's the way it is, and I speak from experience. I lost two good jobs within the space of a year due to the companies I was working for going under.
    "All our beliefs are being challenged now, and rightfully so, they're stupid." - Bill Hicks

  3. #3
    TiG
    TiG is offline
    Walk a mile in other peoples shoes...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Questioning it all
    Posts
    6,213
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked
    47 times in 42 posts
    I personally believe that i'd prefer to see whatever money was potentially used to keep an unprofitable business going, used to start new businesses to employ people.

    Rover has been in an awful position for years. I feel for the people losing their job, but proping up a failing business IS not the answer.

    TiG
    -- Hexus Meets Rock! --

  4. #4
    HEXUS.Metal Knoxville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Down In A Hole
    Posts
    9,388
    Thanks
    484
    Thanked
    442 times in 255 posts
    • Knoxville's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Intel X58
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 920
      • Memory:
      • 2GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATi HD3450
      • PSU:
      • Generic
      • Case:
      • Cheap and nasty
      • Operating System:
      • Vista 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" LG LCD
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 20mb
    We can't subsidise all our companies so they can compete against other companies all over the world that can make a better product for less, it just can't be done.

    I feel sorry for people that loose their job like that I really do but to be brutally honest most of the work I saw being carried out on rovers production line and in the manufacturing area's wasn't hugely skilled and for the most part is something that could be applied to another trade. What I think is wrong is that the government was talking about stumpting up millions of pounds to help rover but they won't help the employee's when it goes under by perhaps providing training for them to go into another field of work.

  5. #5
    Studmuffin Flibb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,904
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked
    324 times in 277 posts
    • Flibb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX-6300
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3 PC3-12800
      • Storage:
      • Samsung SSD 840 EVO 250G
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3GB MSI Radeon HD 7950 Twin Frozr
      • PSU:
      • FSP
      • Operating System:
      • Win7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Deffl TFT thing
    Never figured out why public money isnt spent in a positive maner. In the USA government contracts are mostly issued to US companys, that goes for vehicles, food for the millitary, etc, much of Europe does the thing. Not us oooh no we get meat for the Army, cars for councill workers, police cars, etc, but thers no incentive to buy British. The impact on public finances would have been minimal, but the benefits to somebody like Rover might have made a difference.

  6. #6
    Sublime HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Void.. Floating
    Posts
    11,819
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked
    233 times in 160 posts
    • Stoo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Mac Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2*Xeon 5450 @ 2.8GHz, 12MB Cache
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 1600MHz FBDIMM
      • Storage:
      • ~ 2.5TB + 4TB external array
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon HD 4870
      • Case:
      • Mac Pro
      • Operating System:
      • OS X 10.7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Samsung 244T Black
      • Internet:
      • Zen Max Pro
    Who said they wouldn't?

    The TDI is already on it..
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  7. #7
    Senior Member Russ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    5,201
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    69 times in 44 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Flibb
    Never figured out why public money isnt spent in a positive maner. In the USA government contracts are mostly issued to US companys, that goes for vehicles, food for the millitary, etc, much of Europe does the thing. Not us oooh no we get meat for the Army, cars for councill workers, police cars, etc, but thers no incentive to buy British. The impact on public finances would have been minimal, but the benefits to somebody like Rover might have made a difference.
    ever heard of international trade links??

    guess not.

  8. #8
    Will work for beer... nichomach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Preston, Lancs
    Posts
    6,137
    Thanks
    564
    Thanked
    139 times in 100 posts
    • nichomach's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II X6 1055T 95W
      • Memory:
      • 16GB DR3
      • Storage:
      • 1x250GB Maxtor SATAII, 1x 400GB Hitachi SATAII
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX 1060 3GB
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 500W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Elite 430
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 20" TFT
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media Cable
    Quote Originally Posted by Knoxville
    What I think is wrong is that the government was talking about stumpting up millions of pounds to help rover but they won't help the employee's when it goes under by perhaps providing training for them to go into another field of work.
    Hang on, the government was going to put up a £100m loan as long as SAIC were going to commit to a deal. That money would then have been paid back. They could only lend for a year without falling foul of competition rules, and SAIC wouldn't agree to a deal unless Rover could show it would be solvent for 2 years. The government are discussing whether car manufacturing can continue at the plant in some form and they've already announced a £40m aid package to help suppliers who'll have to find other customers. The PM and the Chancellor were due to visit the West Midlands for crisis talks about the problem. No-one's ignoring it, and there's already a joint task force being set up. Before we start bitching about the government, can we ask where Rover's money actually went, please?

    BBC Linkage

    * Rover sold off their finance arm MGR Capital directly to the four Phoenix directors, so they make no money off finance (although the directors do)
    * Rover sold off their parts business to Caterpillar
    * Rover sold off the land their plant's built on to another company and leased it back
    * They don't own the Rover brand having sold it to BMW
    * All their dealership properties are so heavily mortgaged that they can't sell them
    * They were in the process of selling the MG brand to SAIC as a separate deal

    Bluntly, the company has no real assets left, having sold them off. And where did the proceeds go? I'm not surprised the directors were offering to commit £10m of their own money to the SAIC deal; after all the above, they should be able to just about afford it...

  9. #9
    www.5lab.co.uk
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    6,406
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    nm
    hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Rover was a dead duck ever since Phoenix Holdings took it over from BMW to be honest.

    The ironic thing is that now someone will most likely buy the MG brand and then continue its line of products. Back when Phoenix were buying Rover from BMW there was another group, Alchemy Holdings, which had the plan of buying MG Rover and selling off all the Rover assets and carrying on with the MG brand - The exact situation which is most likely to happen now.

    We were discussing this in Business Studies today and it came up that surprisingly the Chinese consortium who have supposedly “been on the brink” of signing a deal with MG Rover since last August if you believe the press only got a look at Rover’s books in the past 2 months or so. They saw the state of the business’s balance sheet and did a runner. It struck us as extremely odd that the Chinese only saw the books quite recently yet claimed all they had to do was sign the papers. First class bull if you ask me.

    People were harping on about how SAIC would save the 6000 odd jobs at Longbridge. That’s utter crap when you look at the state of Longbridge as a plant – it has a main road running through the middle of it! It is probably the most poorly designed car manufacturing facility in Europe and somehow people expected the Chinese to stay there. I doubt it! They were mostly likely going to liquidate one of Rover’s best assets, its land, and then move the factory to a better designed location which was more efficient and required less labour.

    Should it be saved to ensure there is a British manufacturing base? Think about it this way, the average production line worker is probably asking around £6/hr to sit and do something that someone in Malaysia or Korea will gladly accept £6 a day or maybe even a week for! How can you possibly convince businesses to stay in Britain and pay those sorts of labour costs? The workers in foreign countries are every bit as skilled for those menial production line jobs as the ones in Britain.

    What Britain does do well however is high technology production. Manufacturing that requires highly skilled labour, in which Britain holds its own. Volume car manufacturing doesn’t really fall into this bracket. Rover is finished, as a private company the government is under no obligation to do anything about its demise.

  11. #11
    Goron goron Kumagoro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,154
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    172 times in 140 posts
    BMW shouldnt have been allowed to take the mini and dump them... esp as far as i remember they broke the contract with the gov in someway.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    BMW still own Mini, it was the sweet cherry!

    And I doubt that the new Mini would have been anywhere near as successful as it was without BMW's money to back it both in research and promotion.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    730
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    It should be noted that the board members of the Phoenix Consortium paid themselves £40million last year

  14. #14
    Not *@!%in Postman Pat! Ruggerbugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Rugby, (England for the Yanks)
    Posts
    1,659
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked
    69 times in 53 posts
    • Ruggerbugger's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus A7N8X-E deluxe
      • CPU:
      • XP 3200+
      • Memory:
      • 1GB Kingston PC3200 DDR2 dual channel
      • Storage:
      • 1 x 40GB OS, 1 x 320GB Data
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire 9800 Pro
      • PSU:
      • 400W Akasa (I think)
      • Case:
      • Antec Super Lanboy
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung LE32 LCD 720p
      • Internet:
      • VM 4Mb
    And all the workers will get is government minimum redundancy, which works out to about £11K if you've been there 20 years. To say nothing of the likely state of the pension fund...


    Click here for larger versions of photos

    Quote Originally Posted by Gonzo
    my a55 shoots great video in 1080i

  15. #15
    Goat Boy
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Alexandra Park, London
    Posts
    2,428
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kumagoro
    BMW shouldnt have been allowed to take the mini and dump them... esp as far as i remember they broke the contract with the gov in someway.
    International Asset stripping is frowned upon but I'm not sure if it is illegal. It certainly shows the true colours of BMW, however.
    "All our beliefs are being challenged now, and rightfully so, they're stupid." - Bill Hicks

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    730
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    It's not like the Phoenix Consortium were any better. They did the same, they sold Rovers finance company to themselves (ie, the Directors), they sold the land the plant is on, they say they sold the rights to the Rover 75, god only knows what else.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 1.4 Rover Vs 2.0 Golf GTi
    By Angus in forum Automotive
    Replies: 217
    Last Post: 11-02-2007, 09:41 AM
  2. Range Rover 4.0 DSE?
    By Rave in forum Automotive
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-02-2005, 05:02 PM
  3. Comfy Rover....
    By Tumble in forum Automotive
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 19-07-2004, 05:11 PM
  4. For Sale: Rover Metro 1.1
    By Lead_Head in forum Automotive
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 21-06-2004, 01:30 PM
  5. Rover SD1 For Sale.... (again!)
    By IainB in forum Automotive
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-11-2003, 12:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •