How does it look like the old one? It has an ugly golden ring :|
How does it look like the old one? It has an ugly golden ring :|
New Sig on the Way...
Not exactly a radical re-design, but it doesn't really *need* to be. They'd only end up confusing people if they changed it too much
I haven't a clue what the old logo looks like as I use Firefox but think the modified one by SilentDeath (Internet Exploder) would be better.
Jeez guys - everyone and his dog knows IE is insecure, let's stop pointing out the obvious and comment on the logo like was originally asked?
You're not going to get lynched if you don't mention how much you think that IE is responsible for world famine....
Last edited by Mike Fishcake; 15-08-2005 at 08:42 AM.
looks the same. just darker yellow.
How much RAM and system usage will this logo (and i guess ie too) use up?
Ian
- doesn't look too different, just seems they have added a bit of colour! (i wonder how much the graphic designers charged microsoft if this wasnt done in house?!)
Mac fancier > white macbook base spec .................. CS: muddyfirebang
here's the logo I prefer:
Powered by Marmite and Wet Dog
Light Over Water Photography
Indeed....
How did I guess that Firefox users would need to post its logo....
New Sig on the Way...
The new IE logo does seem to be morphing over time to the firefox one lol
Should we read into this??? lol
On subject, looks fine to me. Not alot different but ok!
well, tab-browsing, intelligent make up, user customisability...all good things. in fact things you don't get with IE...
Powered by Marmite and Wet Dog
Light Over Water Photography
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)