Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 31 of 31

Thread: speeding - GPS Detector tells me off.

  1. #17
    Does he need a reason? Funkstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    19,874
    Thanks
    630
    Thanked
    965 times in 816 posts
    • Funkstar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83GHz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB OCZ PC2-6400C5 800MHz Quad Channel
      • Storage:
      • 650GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB ATI Radeon HD4550
      • PSU:
      • Antec 350W 80+ Efficient PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec NSK1480 Slim Mini Desktop Case
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407 + 2408 monitors
      • Internet:
      • Zen 8mb
    i've been trying to find the Department for Transports rules on the accuracy of speedos, but came up blank. I seem to remember they can be up to 11% off up to 70mph and 13% off over that (by off i mean over estimate your speed). under reading of speed is something like 1 or 2%.

    You ever noticed those white squares painted in the middle of trunk roads? they are for calibrating police speedos on the fly from what i've been told (by a coppers son).

  2. #18
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    385 times in 314 posts
    Dont forget GPS speed is a horizontal speed and would be most accurate in a straight line on level ground.
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  3. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    72
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Funkstar
    You ever noticed those white squares painted in the middle of trunk roads? they are for calibrating police speedos on the fly from what i've been told (by a coppers son).
    nope, they are measured distances for the vascar type of speed detection equipment.

    the distances are not consistent, but they are known measurements. all the copper does is enter the distance then times you between the two points..

    full explanation...

    http://www.radarfalle.de/technik/ueb...nik/vascar.php
    I am trying to see it your way, but I can't get my head up my arse
    My Place MSN and Spam

  4. #20
    www.5lab.co.uk
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    6,406
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Moby-Dick
    Dont forget GPS speed is a horizontal speed and would be most accurate in a straight line on level ground.
    you sure? i thought gps worked on height as well?
    hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..

  5. #21
    Looser Konan555's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    2,749
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    47 times in 44 posts
    Yes, GPS can determine height. It's down to how they're programmed as to weather they display distance moved in two dimensions or three.

  6. #22
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    385 times in 314 posts
    I'm not convinced it does , but MK is too flat to really test it out !
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  7. #23
    mmh
    mmh is offline
    Full Stack Operator mmh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    UK, Stourbridge
    Posts
    1,804
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked
    95 times in 56 posts
    My dad just bought the road angel 2... hasnt arrived yet, but its supposed to be very good.
    : RFNX Ste | : stegough | www.stegough.com

  8. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    600
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    I've heard far too many different comments and opinions on the different speed camera detectors. All I say about my one is that it seems pretty good for the money imho.
    Tim N

  9. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    72
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Moby-Dick
    I'm not convinced it does , but MK is too flat to really test it out !

    trust me, it works fine in 2d. although the units i have will give altitude the speed is constant regardless. I have tried all of mine in various lorries and they read the same whether driving in norfolk or if i'm belting up and down the hills on the m62 (the highest motorway in england)

    I used the tachograph in the truck to check that the speed hadn't varied because of the altitude.
    I am trying to see it your way, but I can't get my head up my arse
    My Place MSN and Spam

  10. #26
    Drop it like it's hot Howard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Surrey, South East
    Posts
    11,731
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked
    42 times in 39 posts
    • Howard's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5B
      • CPU:
      • Core2Duo E6420 2.13GHz
      • Memory:
      • 2x1gb OCZ DDR2 6400
      • Storage:
      • 250GB & 500GB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Inno3d iChill 7900GS
      • PSU:
      • Antec SmartPower 500W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Elite 330
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x AG Neovo F419
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 20mbit
    You needed to be connected to a certain number of satellites (or more) for it to work well in 3D
    Home cinema: Toshiba 42XV555DB Full HD LCD | Onkyo TX-SR705 | NAD C352 | Monitor Audio Bronze B2 | Monitor Audio Bronze C | Monitor Audio Bronze BFX | Yamaha NSC120 | BK Monolith sub | Toshiba HD-EP35 HD-DVD | Samsung BD-P1400 BluRay Player | Pioneer DV-575 | Squeezebox3 | Virgin Media V+ Box
    PC: Asus P5B | Core2duo 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 PC6400 | Inno3d iChill 7900GS | Auzentech X-Plosion 7.1 | 250GB | 500GB | NEC DVDRW | Dual AG Neovo 19"
    HTPC: | Core2Duo E6420 2.13GHz | 2GB DDR2 | 250GBx2 | Radeon X1300 | Terratec Aureon 7.1 | Windows MCE 2005
    Laptop: 1.5GHz Centrino | 512MB | 60GB | 15" Wide TFT | Wifi | DVDRW


  11. #27
    www.5lab.co.uk
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    6,406
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Slamdog
    trust me, it works fine in 2d. although the units i have will give altitude the speed is constant regardless. I have tried all of mine in various lorries and they read the same whether driving in norfolk or if i'm belting up and down the hills on the m62 (the highest motorway in england)

    I used the tachograph in the truck to check that the speed hadn't varied because of the altitude.
    he's not suggesting that the speed would be inaccurate at a given height, just that it would be inaccurate for measuring a road that travelled uphill, because the road is actually longer than the 2d distance
    hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..

  12. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Southampton, UK
    Posts
    253
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • divinemadness's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EP45-UD3L
      • CPU:
      • Q9550 @3.4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair DDR2 PC2-6400
      • Storage:
      • 640GB WD Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 896MB XFX GTX260 55nm
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX650
      • Case:
      • CoolerMaster CM690
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 2032mw
      • Internet:
      • O2 8Mb
    Speedos over read by design to counteract any mishaps that may cause them to under read slightly when they are built.

    You'd be mighty annoyed if you thought you were doing bang on 60 and it turns out you were actually doing 70mph through a camera

  13. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    72
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 5lab
    he's not suggesting that the speed would be inaccurate at a given height, just that it would be inaccurate for measuring a road that travelled uphill, because the road is actually longer than the 2d distance

    it was just me not explaining properly...

    just a thick lorry driver me!
    I am trying to see it your way, but I can't get my head up my arse
    My Place MSN and Spam

  14. #30
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts
    Well....more to the point, if you're done for speeding by a patrol car and you're not 100% sure it's a fair cop (I dunno, say doing 80 in a 70 zone) you should always ask to see the patrol car's speedo calibration certificate. As I understand it, if they ain't got a recent one, you're in the clear*.

    *but google the precise legalities first

  15. #31
    Seething Cauldron of Hatred TheAnimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    17,168
    Thanks
    803
    Thanked
    2,152 times in 1,408 posts
    An engineers perspective:

    First off tire tread. How much does tire tread change by? Think how many times that has to rotate once for a 70mph reading? As such that changes the accuracy imediately.

    So spedo's over rate, to be on the safe side.

    Then GPS, speed isn't velocity as such, remeber that.

    Then remeber that GPS will try and mesure it in 3dimensional space and time how long it takes for you to travel alone a single vector in it. However, there are approximation errors, (as the speed is rounded). I really should draw a diagram. But the idea is quite straight forward its a rough approximation, most GPS units that size have about 50cm accuracy, but, they stay quite accurately in-acurate (ie, say it thinks your 30cm to the right, it doesn't matter because your looking at the relative speed). As such the accuracy of the reciver dosen't matter. Its more a case of how many readings its taking a second. As dips in a road will effect it. a nice straight level dual carrageway/motorway is a better test, when there are no things that will effect radio reception. It will be far more acurate than the car spedo.
    throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Medion - GPS Pocket PC
    By faisal_uk in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 16-05-2004, 04:46 PM
  2. Bluetooth GPS receiver --->Fortuna Bluetooth
    By wiltonson in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-05-2004, 11:20 PM
  3. Pocket PC, GPS sat nav and axims from US??
    By Flibb in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 16-03-2004, 10:52 AM
  4. How would YOU stop speeding??
    By 5lab in forum Automotive
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 27-02-2004, 12:14 AM
  5. Anyone been caught speeding on the M4??
    By gobbo in forum Automotive
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 31-12-2003, 07:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •