Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 23 of 23

Thread: Mobile Memory Card Found, With very peculiar contents!

  1. #17
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts
    It would be illegal to post them on the internet. The copyright resides with the person who took the photos, and they legally have full and final say over how they're used.

  2. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    228
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Just post them here for a few mins and then remove them I think we all need some cheering up

  3. #19
    Zoom-Zoom
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Mistley, Nr Colchester Essex
    Posts
    771
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    I don't have anything against his lifestyle. I am not picking on him. It's the situation of the whole finding the memory card thing I find amusing.

    A picture of someone random on the internet cross dressing isn't funny. It's just the last thing I was expecting to find on there!

    At the time it was incredibly amusing. I would have never posted the pics with a face even if I did post them, that is not fair on the person involved at all, if someone who knew them did happen to see them.

    The pictures are dated from 2004, and I had an update, they were actually found whilst he was cleaning out his garden in a bush beside a path. Makes you wonder how long it's been there. Surely if someone stole his phone they wouldn't throw the card? Would they?

    Maybe he was trying to dispose of the evidence.

    I was never intending to post the pictures to make myself "Feel Good" or "Big" Just thought it would give everyone a chuckle.

  4. #20
    Senior Member JPreston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,667
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    124 times in 74 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rave View Post
    It would be illegal to post them on the internet. The copyright resides with the person who took the photos, and they legally have full and final say over how they're used.
    I don't believe that's correct. Eg the photos of the german soldiers posing with the skull; they remain the property of the photographer? It seems unlikely they were legitimately released. Copyright isn't automatic, you have to actually establish it and the photos presumably didn't come with any copyright notice.

    I'd have no problem with posting them, on the basis that if they were that traumatically embarassing then a) he shouldn't have allowed himself to be photographed and b) should not have left those photos in the street. That's equivalent to sitting under a cow and then crying when you get pooed on

  5. #21
    Now with added sobriety Rave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SE London
    Posts
    9,948
    Thanks
    501
    Thanked
    399 times in 255 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by JPreston View Post
    I don't believe that's correct. Eg the photos of the german soldiers posing with the skull; they remain the property of the photographer?
    I don't know the photos you're referring to- but yes, copyright resides with the photographer unless he assigns it to someone else. The only exception is where the photographer is being employed by someone else to take the photos, in which case the copyright might be owned by their employer (a news agency, for example)- but even then it would generally be made explicitly clear in the photographer's contract of employment.

    Copyright isn't automatic, you have to actually establish it and the photos presumably didn't come with any copyright notice.
    Nope- copyright IS automatic; as soon as the photographer presses the shutter button, the image he creates is copyrighted.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright

    I'd have no problem with posting them, on the basis that if they were that traumatically embarassing then a) he shouldn't have allowed himself to be photographed and b) should not have left those photos in the street.
    Well, for a start you don't know that the photos a) weren't self portraits for personal use and/or b) stolen from the photographer before the memory card was discarded. In any case, the morality of it is irrelevant, the law clearly states that you don't have the right to publish them.

  6. #22
    0iD
    0iD is offline
    M*I*A 0iD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Happy Llama Land
    Posts
    13,247
    Thanks
    1,435
    Thanked
    1,209 times in 757 posts
    • 0iD's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Leave my mother out of it!
      • CPU:
      • If I knew what it meant?
      • Memory:
      • Wah?
      • Storage:
      • Cupboards and drawers
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Slate & chalk
      • PSU:
      • meh
      • Case:
      • Suit or Brief?
      • Operating System:
      • Brain
      • Monitor(s):
      • I was 1 at skool
      • Internet:
      • 28k Dialup
    See, don't mess with the Rave, ee's wellard, nuff sed.
    [
    Quote Originally Posted by Blitzen
    When I say go, both walk in the opposite direction for 10 paces, draw handbags, then bitch-slap each other!

  7. #23
    Seething Cauldron of Hatred TheAnimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    17,168
    Thanks
    803
    Thanked
    2,152 times in 1,408 posts
    when i was 13 i was a little **** who considered it his personal mission to show everyone just how stupid they are.

    Luckily i grew out of that.

    Don't post the pictures, god knows how many embarrasing pictures/txt's i have on my phone memory card, completely un-encypted.

    Also, sad fact is, if someone like me dedicated themself to finding something ebarassing for you it wouldn't take that long now would it. There is a reason i consider a software firewall to be about as useful as a kids pro-abstonance campain, and fundimentally EVERYONE will be doing something "stupid" that could be used by the moral bankrupt to justify humilation for personal giggles.
    throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2gb (66x) SD memory card £17.99
    By Mithrandir in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 29-08-2006, 11:29 AM
  2. ATI Catalyst 5.8 released
    By =TcQi= in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 18-08-2005, 12:35 AM
  3. Overclocking A64s?
    By Prodigy in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-09-2004, 03:42 PM
  4. SD 512MB memory card
    By TiG in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 16-07-2004, 02:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •