Page 10 of 23 FirstFirst ... 7891011121320 ... LastLast
Results 145 to 160 of 363

Thread: Plane on a treadmill...

  1. #145
    No more Mr Nice Guy. Nick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    10,021
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    316 times in 141 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by redsky009 View Post
    But it is connected to the ground, thats the point.
    Well, no, it isn't. It's in contact with the ground which isn't the same thing.

    Quote Originally Posted by redsky009 View Post
    The speed of the treadmill isn't constant, it changes to match the thrust of the plane (and hence the speed of the wheels) and so can't be ignored.
    Yes it can, as you'll see in a minute...

    Quote Originally Posted by redsky009 View Post
    The wheels spinning and the thrust of the engines are not separate - where do the wheels get the force to spin? The engines.
    No, the engines are not connected to the wheels. All any aircraft engine does is move air faster out the back... be it a prop or a jet. All aircraft wheels are unpowered, freewheeling things that stop the paint on the belly of the plane rubbing off on the runway.

    So what's turning the wheels then? The treadmill.

    Quote Originally Posted by redsky009 View Post
    Think about it, if the treadmill was spinning faster than the thrust of the engines, the plane would move backwards. If the thrust of the engines was faster than the speed of the treadmill, the plane would move forwards.
    True to some extent. If you could actually build a dirty great treadmill and stick a 747 on it, then start up the treadmill, friction and momentum would see the 747 move back along the treadmill, the wheels not turning. However, the thrust from the engines is a separate force and, if the wheels are just freewheeling, it makes no odds how fast the treadmill goes or the wheels spin, the force from the engines will still propel the plane forwards, relative to a point stationary to both the treadmill and the plane.


    Quote Originally Posted by redsky009 View Post
    The problems states than the treadmill matches the speed of the wheels. The wheels aren't powered by anything other than the thrust of the engines and so the force produced by the engines is matched by the force produced by the treadmill....
    Again, the wheels aren't powered by anything at all... they turn because of the friction between them and the relative speed of the object they're attached to.

    Imagine a landing plane... the wheels aren;t spinning as it comes into touch down but then they spin like fury as the plane lands... that plane could land on ice and the wheels would skid... perhaps even lock up if the pilot applies the breaks... does the plane instantly stop moving? No. That's because the relationship between the wheels and the plane and the wheels and the surface are two different things, which is why the wheels are freespinning...

    As someone said earlier, imagine there are no wheels. In fact, how about imagining you've got the worlds first flying hovercraft... the speed of the wheels over the treamill and the speed of the treadmill are unaffected by the thrust of the engines... (other than to make the wheels spin like billy-o...)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dareos View Post
    "OH OOOOHH oOOHHHHHHHOOHHHHHHH FILL ME WITH YOUR.... eeww not the stuff from the lab"

  2. #146
    Tools are the subtlest of traps redsky009's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    626
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • redsky009's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5B Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.29 Ghz with Arctic Freezer Pro 7 cooling
      • Memory:
      • 4 GB Corsair Twin XMS 6400 (Cas 4)
      • Storage:
      • 320GB Seagate + 500GB WD (SATA 300, 7,200rpm)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1GB PowerColor HD4870
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 520W (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Centurion 532
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • NEC LCD2070NX (20", 1600x1200)
      • Internet:
      • 22Mb ADSL 2+
    sorry, silly Firefox, double posting

  3. #147
    Tools are the subtlest of traps redsky009's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    626
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • redsky009's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5B Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.29 Ghz with Arctic Freezer Pro 7 cooling
      • Memory:
      • 4 GB Corsair Twin XMS 6400 (Cas 4)
      • Storage:
      • 320GB Seagate + 500GB WD (SATA 300, 7,200rpm)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1GB PowerColor HD4870
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 520W (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Centurion 532
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • NEC LCD2070NX (20", 1600x1200)
      • Internet:
      • 22Mb ADSL 2+
    Quote Originally Posted by JPreston View Post
    Why is there a hand pushing the plane back? The treadmill exerts zero force on the plane because the (frictionless) wheels freely rotate. All that happens is the wheels spin faster.
    If it was frictionless, the wheels wouldn't rotate at all, the treadmill would spin and the wheels would remain stationary.

    Think of it this way, a car is travelling at 100 mph: its engine exerts a force of x N forwards, the road exerts a force of exactly x N on the car - The forces balance, the car is moving, but not accelerating. In order for the plane to take off, it needs to exert more force than the treadmill exerts back, but this wont happen as the treamill (unlike a road) changes its speed and thus the force to match the thrust of the plane

  4. #148
    Large Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    3,720
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked
    99 times in 64 posts
    Ahhh, but the F/A-18 hornet has a powered nosewheel
    To err is human. To really foul things up ... you need a computer.

  5. #149
    Almost in control. autopilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Region 2
    Posts
    4,071
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked
    12 times in 11 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by redsky009 View Post
    If it was frictionless, the wheels wouldn't rotate at all, the treadmill would spin and the wheels would remain stationary.
    People are talking about the bearings in the wheel, not the wheels rubber against the surface of the treadmill.

  6. #150
    Tools are the subtlest of traps redsky009's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    626
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • redsky009's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5B Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.29 Ghz with Arctic Freezer Pro 7 cooling
      • Memory:
      • 4 GB Corsair Twin XMS 6400 (Cas 4)
      • Storage:
      • 320GB Seagate + 500GB WD (SATA 300, 7,200rpm)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1GB PowerColor HD4870
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 520W (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Centurion 532
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • NEC LCD2070NX (20", 1600x1200)
      • Internet:
      • 22Mb ADSL 2+
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick View Post
    So what's turning the wheels then? The treadmill.
    So many things to address, so little time

    Just plane (I'll get my coats) wrong - the treadmill matches the speed of the wheels, hence if the wheels weren't turing, the treadmill wouldn't make them turn as it wouldn't be turning either.

    The fact that the wheels are freespinning is all well and good, but the only reason the wheels are turning at all is the friction with the treadmill surface and the force from the thrust of the engines to which they are attached, (albeit indirectly). If they weren't attched the wheels would stick to the treadmill and the engines would go forward and leave their little wheels behind.

    anyway, until someone builds one (myth busters anyone?) to on small scale for e.g. the sceptics will never beleive

  7. #151
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    2,435
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    4 times in 2 posts
    • BenW's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Dual SATA2
      • CPU:
      • AMD64 3500+
      • Memory:
      • 1GB Crucial DDR
      • Storage:
      • 160GB Samsung 8MB Cache
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Radeon HD 3850
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12 600W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ-04
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 17" Ultrasharp
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 8Mb
    The treadmill does not move the air around it. Therefore the air around the treadmill (And the plane) is just the same as it would be on a normal tarmac runway.

    Planes work by moving the air around them. Ony the treadmill the air is the same as air on a stationary runway.

    The wheels are disconnected to the engine so are free to spin at any speed.

    A plane on a treadmill is identical to a plane on a runway.

  8. #152
    Tools are the subtlest of traps redsky009's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    626
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • redsky009's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5B Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.29 Ghz with Arctic Freezer Pro 7 cooling
      • Memory:
      • 4 GB Corsair Twin XMS 6400 (Cas 4)
      • Storage:
      • 320GB Seagate + 500GB WD (SATA 300, 7,200rpm)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1GB PowerColor HD4870
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 520W (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Centurion 532
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • NEC LCD2070NX (20", 1600x1200)
      • Internet:
      • 22Mb ADSL 2+
    Quote Originally Posted by autopilot View Post
    People are talking about the bearings in the wheel, not the wheels rubber against the surface of the treadmill.
    Ay, but ball bearings or not the wheels are physically attached to the plane. If you pushed the wheels on a frictionless surfcae, the plane would move.

  9. #153
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    2,435
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    4 times in 2 posts
    • BenW's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Dual SATA2
      • CPU:
      • AMD64 3500+
      • Memory:
      • 1GB Crucial DDR
      • Storage:
      • 160GB Samsung 8MB Cache
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Radeon HD 3850
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12 600W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ-04
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 17" Ultrasharp
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 8Mb
    Quote Originally Posted by redsky009 View Post
    Ay, but ball bearings or not the wheels are physically attached to the plane. If you pushed the wheels on a frictionless surfcae, the plane would move.
    No it wouldn't, the wheel would spin on the surface

  10. #154
    Tools are the subtlest of traps redsky009's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    626
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • redsky009's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5B Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.29 Ghz with Arctic Freezer Pro 7 cooling
      • Memory:
      • 4 GB Corsair Twin XMS 6400 (Cas 4)
      • Storage:
      • 320GB Seagate + 500GB WD (SATA 300, 7,200rpm)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1GB PowerColor HD4870
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 520W (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Centurion 532
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • NEC LCD2070NX (20", 1600x1200)
      • Internet:
      • 22Mb ADSL 2+
    Quote Originally Posted by BenW View Post
    No it wouldn't, the wheel would spin on the surface
    sorry, should ahve said, if you exerted horizontal force on the wheel, the plane would move.

    Wine time play nicely now, i hope to have a hangover in the morning

  11. #155
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    So wait a minute, the plane is weightless or there is no gravity? these planes weigh a hell of a lot and so the wheels aren't just going to spin freely, you all talking about it as if the wheels are just touching the treadmill so they just spin, friction and the weight combined means that the wheels are effective to a certain point until the speed of the plane/treadmill overcomes the wheels friction and it's own weight meaning that there is no longer anything pulling it back. I think I don't know what I am talking about :F maybe just a load of rubbish, but I've gone back on myself lol.

    So the plane wouldn't take off for a while, that's all

  12. #156
    Tools are the subtlest of traps redsky009's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    626
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • redsky009's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5B Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.29 Ghz with Arctic Freezer Pro 7 cooling
      • Memory:
      • 4 GB Corsair Twin XMS 6400 (Cas 4)
      • Storage:
      • 320GB Seagate + 500GB WD (SATA 300, 7,200rpm)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1GB PowerColor HD4870
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 520W (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Centurion 532
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • NEC LCD2070NX (20", 1600x1200)
      • Internet:
      • 22Mb ADSL 2+
    Quote Originally Posted by Skyrail View Post
    So wait a minute, the plane is weightless or there is no gravity? these planes weigh a hell of a lot and so the wheels aren't just going to spin freely, you all talking about it as if the wheels are just touching the treadmill so they just spin, friction and the weight combined means that the wheels are effective to a certain point until the speed of the plane/treadmill overcomes the wheels friction and it's own weight meaning that there is no longer anything pulling it back. I think I don't know what I am talking about :F maybe just a load of rubbish, but I've gone back on myself lol.

    So the plane wouldn't take off for a while, that's all
    Almost right, except in this situation, the force exerted by the ground/treadmill is changing with the force of the plane's engines, so the plane would never overcome this resistance and never move forward.

  13. #157
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    hmm, good point, then again if it did get to the right speed a matter of things probably would of happened including ran out of fuel, engines overheated, reached it's terminal velocity yadayada

  14. #158
    Senior Member JPreston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,667
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    124 times in 74 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Skyrail View Post
    So wait a minute, the plane is weightless or there is no gravity? these planes weigh a hell of a lot and so the wheels aren't just going to spin freely, you all talking about it as if the wheels are just touching the treadmill so they just spin, friction and the weight combined means that the wheels are effective to a certain point...
    Noooo as posted above the tyres are perfectly grippy, there is 100% friction between the tyres and the treadmill, they work exactly as they should. The plane is of normal weight, gravity is normal, the wheel bearings are frictionless so the wheels are 100% efficient. Everything works exactly as it ideally should.

  15. #159
    No more Mr Nice Guy. Nick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    10,021
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    316 times in 141 posts
    Right, I've got one word to solve all of this.


    Helicopters.



    Go away, find out how they fly (not how you THINK they fly but actually how they really do fly, ie, go a research and read), then come back and admit that either the plane will take off or helicopters cannot fly.

    Go on, stop reading this post, go and Google.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dareos View Post
    "OH OOOOHH oOOHHHHHHHOOHHHHHHH FILL ME WITH YOUR.... eeww not the stuff from the lab"

  16. #160
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Changed my mind again after discussing it with my dad, I keep on changing my mind too much, I'll stick with it won't move

Page 10 of 23 FirstFirst ... 7891011121320 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. IL2:Forgotten Battles FAQ
    By Nick in forum PC
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 21-01-2005, 03:13 PM
  2. Being in a plane
    By dkmech in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-09-2004, 02:45 PM
  3. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-08-2004, 11:16 PM
  4. JOKE: Plane crash in Ireland
    By Allen in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 11-02-2004, 06:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •