Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: 128MB GeForce FX 5900 XT

  1. #1
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    45
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    128MB GeForce FX 5900 XT

    128MB GeForce FX 5900 XT

    is this card a good mid range contender?

  2. #2
    Slippery when wet
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Newcastle, England
    Posts
    759
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Id class that as more high-end, ive got a FX 5800 Ultra 128mb which has faster memory timings than the FX5900 and i love it, the new graphics core on the FX5900's make up for the FX5800 Ultras memory speeds

    Cr4iG

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Just outside Aberdeen.
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I think the 5900Xt is a slightly gimped 5900.
    There was a news link on Hexus a while ago, I believe it fared well, beating the 5700Ultra and 9600XT by around 25-30%, but IIRC, the DX9 benchmarks removed it's pants. As with the other nVidia cards. But otherwise did well. And it was aimed at $200. I think. But don't quote me on that.
    Perhaps someone who is more knowledgable can comment?

    Anyhoo, here's a recent review.
    Last edited by NeilI; 14-01-2004 at 01:24 AM.
    [XP2500-M @ 200x11] [2X512MB Crucial PC2700] [MSI K7N2 Delta ISLR] [160GB 8MB Samsung SP1614N] [160GB 8MB Maxtor DiamondMax9] [Megaworks 250Ds] [GeforceFX 5900] [Viewsonic VP171s]


  4. #4
    TiG
    TiG is offline
    Walk a mile in other peoples shoes...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Questioning it all
    Posts
    6,213
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked
    47 times in 42 posts
    Its definitely a High end card, Its the Equivilant of the 9800 Pro, there is one higher in NVidia's range which is the 5950.

    TiG
    -- Hexus Meets Rock! --

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Just outside Aberdeen.
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    £145 for that performace? Must be good?!?!
    [XP2500-M @ 200x11] [2X512MB Crucial PC2700] [MSI K7N2 Delta ISLR] [160GB 8MB Samsung SP1614N] [160GB 8MB Maxtor DiamondMax9] [Megaworks 250Ds] [GeforceFX 5900] [Viewsonic VP171s]


  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    LONDON
    Posts
    318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NeilI
    I think the 5900Xt is a slightly gimped 5900.
    There was a news link on Hexus a while ago, I believe it fared well, beating the 5700Ultra and 9600XT by around 25-30%, but IIRC, the DX9 benchmarks removed it's pants. As with the other nVidia cards. But otherwise did well. And it was aimed at $200. I think. But don't quote me on that.
    Perhaps someone who is more knowledgable can comment?

    Anyhoo, here's a recent review.
    Yes it's supposed to be the equivalent of ATI's Radeon SE range - but it seems like it's does a little better than that:

    Review

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    888
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TiG
    Its definitely a High end card, Its the Equivilant of the 9800 Pro, there is one higher in NVidia's range which is the 5950.

    TiG
    No no, that's the 5900 ultra...this is the 5900XT, a cut down 5900 on a smaller PCB, performance above 9600XT and 5700 Ultra just about, but still has the dodgy dx9 problems with all nvidia boards.

    Definitely a mid range bargain if it's the same price as a 9600XT, but anything above £140-150 for it and I'd say it's not worth the cash, especially with the dx9 flaw.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Just outside Aberdeen.
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Byatt
    No no, that's the 5900 ultra...this is the 5900XT, a cut down 5900 on a smaller PCB, performance above 9600XT and 5700 Ultra just about, but still has the dodgy dx9 problems with all nvidia boards.

    Definitely a mid range bargain if it's the same price as a 9600XT, but anything above £140-150 for it and I'd say it's not worth the cash, especially with the dx9 flaw.
    I'm not up to speed on the flaws of the nVidia boards, but are these flaws software or hardware??
    Basicially, if nVidia sorts the drivers out, is there a chance the DX9 performance will improve??


    Cheers.
    [XP2500-M @ 200x11] [2X512MB Crucial PC2700] [MSI K7N2 Delta ISLR] [160GB 8MB Samsung SP1614N] [160GB 8MB Maxtor DiamondMax9] [Megaworks 250Ds] [GeforceFX 5900] [Viewsonic VP171s]


  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Just outside Aberdeen.
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by d__lindsay
    128MB GeForce FX 5900 XT

    is this card a good mid range contender?
    You may wish to consider the 5900XT-VTD from here, as it sports MyVIVO capabilities too.

    Uh, am I right in thinking thats the same as AIW???
    [XP2500-M @ 200x11] [2X512MB Crucial PC2700] [MSI K7N2 Delta ISLR] [160GB 8MB Samsung SP1614N] [160GB 8MB Maxtor DiamondMax9] [Megaworks 250Ds] [GeforceFX 5900] [Viewsonic VP171s]


  10. #10
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    45
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    thankyou for all the help

    so i have reached the conclusion that this card is a good mid range contender?

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    888
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NeilI
    You may wish to consider the 5900XT-VTD from here, as it sports MyVIVO capabilities too.

    Uh, am I right in thinking thats the same as AIW???
    in response to this, and your previous post:

    it's thought that there is an architectural problem with dx9 for nvidia boards (I think, we need someone like austin to clarify this) which is being worked around with drivers...obviously this workaround will get better overtime, but it's generally considered that ati cards are natively pretty good with dx9. (get this clarified by someone who knows more than me before accepting it as fact though )

    VIVO isn't quite the same as an AIW card...AIW cards come with a TV tuner and VIVO, VIVO cards just have VIVO.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Just outside Aberdeen.
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Byatt
    VIVO isn't quite the same as an AIW card...AIW cards come with a TV tuner and VIVO, VIVO cards just have VIVO.
    (sorry to hijack the thread...)

    So what does VIVO actually do?
    If I provide a RF in from my aerial, will it record TV programmes? Or does it need to go through the TV, or VCR first???

    Thanks again.
    [XP2500-M @ 200x11] [2X512MB Crucial PC2700] [MSI K7N2 Delta ISLR] [160GB 8MB Samsung SP1614N] [160GB 8MB Maxtor DiamondMax9] [Megaworks 250Ds] [GeforceFX 5900] [Viewsonic VP171s]


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. GeForce FX 5650 Go 128MB vs. Mobility Radeon 9600 64MB
    By KiNeSiS in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 21-08-2003, 11:54 PM
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 21-08-2003, 05:53 PM
  3. ABIT OTES GeForce FX 5900 128MB
    By Rys in forum HEXUS Reviews
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-08-2003, 02:53 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-08-2003, 10:02 PM
  5. radeon 9800 or geforce fx 5900 ultra
    By s4ch117 in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 31-07-2003, 01:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •