heres the compares right now #1 in both 2k1 and 2k3 on the ORB
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2496345
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7819075
heres the compares right now #1 in both 2k1 and 2k3 on the ORB
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2496345
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7819075
Holy Crap, and thats with ONLY a X800 Pro, imagine with an X800 XT.
Where can I get a 3.1Ghz unknown CPU like yours?! lol
is that an FX 53 OC'd? 940 or 939?
I'm really wanting to get a Vapochill / Mach2 now. If they could just make the unit a little smaller and quieter (cheaper would be nice too) I would definitely get one. I want a unit that you could squeeze in to a regular case, like you can with a watercooling rig. It doesnt have to be as powerful as the full rig. Something that could just keep the CPU to under ambient at full load. I wouldnt want to have to deal with the frost anyway (no heating element needed).
Crikey man...that is quite insane.
How do you get all the parts? you buy them, or kinda get them in a sponsership way?
| XP1600-m | ASUS AN78X Deluxe | r9700 pro | 2x512mb pc37000 |
i buy all the parts myself
updates!!
aquamark3
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=882465205
2k3
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2500607
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7821057
MICKEY...you are an ANIMAL....
must be why you fit in here!
Congrats on being the owner of such a BEAST!
Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
You know whats sad... You have double my 3dMark2003 score... but still the average frame rates are only in about the 70fps range. (twice mine)
Still not really playable, if it was a FPS game. I like 70fps to be my minimum fps at the very worst. So I need an average of 130fps usually.
<begin rant>
So according to 3dmark2003 I still need about double the current videocard's performance to play a game with that level of detail. I highlighted "According.." to them b/c I think they have a very poorly coded engine on purpose so the graphicscards/system have low performance.
A good engine should scale well with more CPU Mhz, ram, and better videocards. Like Quake3 engines usually do. (vs. Commanche, 3dMark2k3, etc) Where somethings barely affect the benchmarks at all. It indicates a poorly designed engine with bottlenecks. A good engine should utilize the resources better.
<end rant>
omg i wish i could have half mark of urs
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)