Kewl!is it actually possible to disable the extra cache? also would ram make a difference as u have 768 and i have 512... plus you also run 400MHz fsb and i run 370...but if we are gonna clock to same speeds then it should be fair,but i dunno as ram etc... good fun thoOriginally Posted by Zathras
PS prolly gonna oc the 9600xt a bit more as trying out RADlink atm
Last edited by |{££|"; 15-12-2004 at 10:55 AM.
Clock speeds/cache size make very little difference to 3DM2003, it's almost entirely graphics card bound. You can disable cache on XP series processors as long as they're not the 'superlocked' type, it's the L2 + L9 bridges. As I say though, not worth the bother.
Nope.also would ram make a difference as u have 768 and i have 512
His is 400MHz DDR (200MHz actual).... plus you also run 200MHz fsb and i run 370...
Rich :¬)
opps yeh mis typedembarrased lol i meant his is 400mhz fsb and mines 370.
So, are you going to set a 3DMark2003 (build 3.5.0) world record for a 9600 series card and beat my score, or are you going to admit defeat gracefully?
Last edited by Zathras; 15-12-2004 at 05:25 PM.
w00t! i said i have a 5000+ 3dmark ffs.besides whats the point in posting a screenshot when u could just edit it in paint etc and change the score.
You actually said you had a card that would own mine. You don't post screenshots, you submit a score to futuremark like I did. These are pretty much hackproof.
but i only have the demo version... surely you have to be registered to submit?which means paying for full product?
No, you can submit with the demo too.
oh right kewl.what settings you want me to test it at?
Stock, which is 1024x768 res with no AA or AF.
Rich :¬)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote