Read more.AMD's fastest single-GPU graphics card is yet to be officially announced, but it's already being put to the test.
Read more.AMD's fastest single-GPU graphics card is yet to be officially announced, but it's already being put to the test.
"apparently" he didn't even get slapped wrists for the original "accident", shouldn't results like this be coming from shady Chinese websites and not a UK retailer? all very confusing, its no wonder others are seething
VodkaOriginally Posted by Ephesians
Is it fair to compare performance of a 4870 on W7 with the 4890 on Vista? Seems a bit incongrous to me. Ah well - I shall look forward to the official tests, the subsequent GTS 275 tests and the inevitable 260 price drop.
What I find absolutely hilarious is the fact these marketing tactics were used at the other place for years, table turns and the other place throws a complete fit, superb.
It's always the case that you pay a premium for the high-end, and you end up paying more £ for each frame/percentage increase in performance. Nothing new at all there!
Considering that an ATI 4850 can beat a 9800GTX+ in Tomb Raider Anniversary, World in Conflict, Call of Duty 4 etc..., and hold its own in Crysis, a 4890 should offer a easily justifiable performance increase
I just can't believe they didn't throw a 1GB 4870 in to the benchmarking mix - surely that is a more appropriate comparison to the new card?! Not to mention GTX260 (both core versions) would be nice in there too. Oh well, can't have everything. A little underwhelming on first sight, will have to wait for full review...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)