That's because you are using MPC instead of MPC-HC (which has many codecs built-in).
That's because you are using MPC instead of MPC-HC (which has many codecs built-in).
Ahhh thats quite interesting. So that has the essentials built in but can also use external ones if you need them?
To comment on VLC 2.0, i tried it last night and its pretty good, seems to use less resources than version 1. Haven't tried 1080p on my net book yet though.... need to do that.
Regular MPC already had a few, but was relatively limited, as it's made to work with external codecs in order to function optimally. MPC-HC did change several things, both from more advanced output renderers and by including more transform filters.
Both MPC and MPC-HC can load external ones when needed.
Who said anything about esoteric formats? I'm merely saying that through selective codec installation, you can obtain the highest performance and image quality on every single format, common and esoteric alike.
But like I said previously, codec installation isn't for the faint of heart, which is where VLC's plug and play ease of use enters.
I'm so sorry guys, I had it all mixed up. Too little sleep sometimes leads to this
abaxas, my bad, you're right.
But on the whole post processing note, different decoders do have different post processing features, as in higher quality post processing, not different post processing features.
But basically, ease of use and streaming is where VLC has the upper hand. Codec packs can be solution, but some care is required to install them, as there is often quite a lot of clutter on those.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)