I should point out that when i said MPC was my de facto player, i did mean K-Lite - i just assumed they were synonymous with each other.
Kalniel: "Nice review Tarinder - would it be possible to get a picture of the case when the components are installed (with the side off obviously)?"
CAT-THE-FIFTH: "The Antec 300 is a case which has an understated and clean appearance which many people like. Not everyone is into e-peen looking computers which look like a cross between the imagination of a hyperactive 10 year old and a Frog."
TKPeters: "Off to AVForum better Deal - £20+Vat for Free Shipping @ Scan"
for all intents it seems to be the same card minus some gays name on it and a shielded cover ? with OEM added to it - GoNz0.
Aidan, I thought you were being sarcastic at first!
I can't stand codec packs to begin with, but I thought most felt that K-Lite was the Norton of the codec-pack world?
If you need a codec pack, and I certainly haven't in the past 5 years, then most seem to suggest Shark007.
I install the XviD encoder for some videos at work (for some videos to play on non-hardware accelerated PCs), but that's it.
CCCP has served me well as a CODEC pack, mainly because they seem actively involved with MPC-HC and ffsshow development and neither lag behind or include extraneous crap (who even needs a standalone VP6 codec anyway when installed along with ffdshow?). I'd say something pithy about LAVsplitter and LAVaudio/video making it obsolete, but CCCP is already switching to using them anyway. MadVR and reclock are nice to have, though.
I keep a copy of VLC handy for really esoteric and/or older formats that I don't want the installed codecs for cluttering up the place (e.g. Real Video) or are malformed enough that MPC-HC chokes on them, but it's such an unpleasant experience to use that it remains a last resort. The amount of rigmarole you have to go through just to get even half-decent deinterlacing working!
If you want you video to just play, VLC is great. If you want it to look good, then MPC-HC is the way to go by far.
Nope. It is the most complete, but it doesn't adversely impact loading times or performance.
Tried it, it's buggy and slows down file opening times to a crawl, and leaves junk behind when you uninstall it.
I also play flvs and matroskas which need rarer codecs and muxers which aren't so straight forward to install individually by hand..
I know what you mean, It's that rare I disagree with aidanjt I thought he was trolling for a moment
I've had some bad experiences with K-lite in the past too, but I've not tested it recently (twice shy and all that). Maybe I'll try it again in the future, on the understanding that aidanjt gets the full rage and any fallout that may occur
I have to say K-Lite has destroyed my system in the past, up to the point of having to nuke the whole thing and start anew. But, recent versions are more appeasing to the gods of stability, as in allowing for codec conflicts, and doing a much cleaner job.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)