Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 17 to 32 of 39

Thread: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

  1. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    150
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    25 times in 12 posts
    • Kirano's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P67A-GD53 (B3)
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 2500K
      • Storage:
      • 1Tb Samsung F1, 500Gb Samsung F1
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS 6970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • Antec 1200
      • Operating System:
      • Windows XP, Windows 7 Pro (64bit), Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC 27" 1920x1080p, Dell 22inch 1920X1080
      • Internet:
      • Generally okay, occasionally rubbish!

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    Quote Originally Posted by Tpyo View Post
    Agreed BUT tell me if I'm missing something...

    Bismuth 212 has a half life of around (an hour?). How long would the battery still be putting out useable energy (genuine question - anyone know?) - I thought the main advantage of nuclear batteries was their long life (esp. given that they are not rechargeable).

    Bi-212 is an alpha emitter. GOOD NEWS. Even a sheet of paper between it at your crown jewels should protect you from 'ball cancer', yet alone any casing of the device it was powering.

    NOW FOR THE BAD PART - If Bi-212 is a short half-life alpha emitter, doesn't that make it excellent source material for a 'dirty bomb'. Get enough of it airborn in a blast and the contamination of the area might not last long, but anyone who inhales any quantity of alpha-emmitter to remain and decay in their lungs will not be doing so bad. While highly impractical as a real weapon, this would be extremely practical as a weapon of terror. Your victims would be alive and suffering for sufficiently long to garner you a LOT of airtime. Their public (and painful) deaths would probably induce all the publci fear you'd need.
    The short answer is... no!

    Firstly, Bi-212 is not an alpha emitter. It's decay product Polonium-212 is which has a half life of generally less than a microSecond but occasionally up to a minute, is the alpha emitter.

    Secondly, the half life of Bismuth-212 being so short (an hour at most) you would have to create it and release the bomb in a matter of hours for it to be of an use. Creating Bismuth-212 isn't like creating a milkshake. You need a high powered accelerator and sufficient target material. So you're looking at building and setting off your bomb at the most less than an hours drive from such a facility, of which there are very few with sufficient capabilities for creating this kind of material.

    Thirdly, even if you could get the material, build you bomb and transport it, realistically, this it going to take at the least an hour, if not two, by which point a half to a quarter of your material has already decayed. The point of the bomb would be to spread this stuff over a wide area right? You'd be further diluting your activity and be reaching a point where the immediate effects of the radiation would be virtually nill! It takes A LOT of radiation for someone to die of radiation sickness!

    Finally, given the complexity of what you'd be trying to do, you would get noticed and stopped!
    Last edited by Kirano; 22-03-2013 at 02:02 PM. Reason: For clarity....

  2. Received thanks from:

    Tpyo (22-03-2013)

  3. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    Isn't this what Terminators use ;-)

  4. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    154
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    7 times in 7 posts

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    Quote Originally Posted by bobfoc View Post
    Not sure I'm so worried about my phone giving me ball cancer now, more so the mini Chernobyl that powers it!!!!!
    Yeah, except that one thing has nothing to do with the other.

  5. Received thanks from:

    Kirano (22-03-2013)

  6. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    29 times in 24 posts

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirano View Post
    The short answer is... no!
    ... even if you could get the material, build you bomb and transport it, realistically, this it going to take at the least an hour, if not two, by which point a half to a quarter of your material has already decayed. The point of the bomb would be to spread this stuff over a wide area right? You'd be further diluting your activity and be reaching a point where the immediate effects of the radiation would be virtually nill! It takes A LOT of radiation for someone to die of radiation sickness!
    Thanks for the info.

    Follow-up question - surely the length of time the bismuth would be dangerous is directly related to the length of time it would be useful as a battery. Ergo - any battery based on storing charged Bi-212 would be very short lived and face all the same issues.

    Re: Radiation sickness. I was thinking more of long-term issues like cancer. People would generate the immediate fear/drama, not intiial damage from the blast. If people know they were exposed, they're alive and healthy for a long time to keep whatever issue was the 'cause' of the blast in the news. Any and all cancers in exposed individuals in the future would be attributed to the blast by the press, and re-invigorate the coverage.

    PS - A quick search on the interwebs suggests Bi-212 decays by both alpha (to Tl-208 by alpha emission, followed by beta emission to lead) or beta-emission (to polonium-212 followed by alpha emission to lead - note: shaky interweb source and this obviously isn't my field - I didn't even know any isotopes could have multiple decay pathways!), and that around 2/3 is by the beta/polonium pathway you describe.
    Last edited by Tpyo; 22-03-2013 at 02:29 PM.

  7. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Kingdom O Fife
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    15 times in 13 posts
    • zaph0d's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI X570-A Pro
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
      • Memory:
      • 48GB - 2X 32GB and 2X 16GB at 3200
      • Storage:
      • 480GB NVME (OS) 2TB 8 Drive sas Raid0 (Games)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Geforce 1070
      • PSU:
      • 1000W Coolermaster
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-343B (Original Model)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2X 55" Samsung 4k tv's
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 500Mb

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirano View Post
    Re: electric cars, they already are using/planning the use of spacecraft and deep space satellites that are powered by the decay heat from radioactive isotopes, so the technology exists!
    The tech has been in existance and in use for decades. Good 'ole Voyager I and Voyager II from the late 70's use Plutonium 238 based RTG (Radio-isotope Thermo-electric Generator) that put out 470W brand new and 315W 23 years later (about 33% less). This loss was more to do with the degradation of the Thermocouples (heat to electricity conversion) than the nuclear material which was still putting out 83% of the heat it did when brand new.

    Still, I don't see these going into phones/tablets/laptops etc, gotta get rid of the excess heat and these things run HOT!

    In a car is more likely, conceivably you could use the excess heat to warm water and drive a small turbine to generate a little more to up the efficiency.

    However, if they've found a way to convert radiation directly into electricity and have also found a way to stop-start the material degradation then it might run cold enough to put into something the size of a laptop but I doubt it'd go into a phone/tablet.

  8. #22
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    As indicated in my previous post in this thread,nuclear powered pacemakers have been working for decades.

  9. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    150
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    25 times in 12 posts
    • Kirano's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P67A-GD53 (B3)
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 2500K
      • Storage:
      • 1Tb Samsung F1, 500Gb Samsung F1
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS 6970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • Antec 1200
      • Operating System:
      • Windows XP, Windows 7 Pro (64bit), Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC 27" 1920x1080p, Dell 22inch 1920X1080
      • Internet:
      • Generally okay, occasionally rubbish!

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    Quote Originally Posted by Tpyo View Post
    Thanks for the info.

    Follow-up question - surely the length of time the bismuth would be dangerous is directly related to the length of time it would be useful as a battery. Ergo - any battery based on storing charged Bi-212 would be very short lived and face all the same issues.

    Re: Radiation sickness. I was thinking more of long-term issues like cancer. People would generate the immediate fear/drama, not intiial damage from the blast. If people know they were exposed, they're alive and healthy for a long time to keep whatever issue was the 'cause' of the blast in the news. Any and all cancers in exposed individuals in the future would be attributed to the blast by the press, and re-invigorate the coverage.

    PS - A quick search on the interwebs suggests Bi-212 decays by both alpha (to Tl-208 by alpha emission, followed by beta emission to lead) or beta-emission (to polonium-212 followed by alpha emission to lead - note: shaky interweb source and this obviously isn't my field - I didn't even know any isotopes could have multiple decay pathways!), and that around 2/3 is by the beta/polonium pathway you describe.
    You are correct, my mistake! It does decay in part by alpha emission. My previous points still stand though...

    Regarding how long it would be dangerous for... I don't understand how this battery concept really works - most of the concepts that people have posted above(zaph0d and CAT-THE-FIFTH) rely on much longer lived isotopes! How they can make an isotope with a one hour half life useful for a long term battery is, currently, beyond me. I imagine that what ever this 'nuclear battery' is, it's very different from what we've seen previously.
    But even if it were to remain dangerous for a length of time - what are you going to do? Steal loads of watches?!?

    And finally, regarding the issue of radiation induced cancers.... That's something that, frankly, is incredibly difficult, if not impossible to quantify. Over 20 years on from Chernobyl and we still don't know (and may never truely know) the 'number' of cancers that were caused by that event as opposed to natural cancer rate + any number of other potential cancer inducing routes. We're not even sure of the dose limit at which the effects of radiation are quantifyable. It's all statistical guess work.

    The other thing to bear in mind is - an event like this would put people exposed on a medical watch list. They'd get far more regular check ups, as there chance of getting a cancer would be elevated, and it's more likely that a cancer would be spotted early and there chances of survival greater! Ironically, they'd probably be more likely to survive in the long term!

  10. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Kingdom of Fife (Scotland)
    Posts
    4,991
    Thanks
    393
    Thanked
    220 times in 190 posts
    • crossy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabertooth X99
      • CPU:
      • Intel 5830k / Noctua NH-D15
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 850Pro NVMe, 1TB Samsung 850EVO SSD, 1TB Seagate SSHD, 2TB WD Green, 8TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix GTX970OC
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750 (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster HAF932 (with wheels)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit, Ubuntu 16.04LTS
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG Flattron W2361V
      • Internet:
      • VirginMedia 200Mb

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    Quote Originally Posted by zaph0d View Post
    However, if they've found a way to convert radiation directly into electricity and have also found a way to stop-start the material degradation then it might run cold enough to put into something the size of a laptop but I doubt it'd go into a phone/tablet.
    I remember reading something about carbon nano-tubes being used as some kind of "solar panel for other radiation".

    EDIT:
    There's High-energy Beta-particle source for BetaVoltaic Power Converter but that could be complete moonshine. On the other hand, Nuclear Energy Conversion with Stacks of Graphene Nano-capacitors seems to come from a decent source.

    Career status: still enjoying my new career in DevOps, but it's keeping me busy...

  11. #25
    Senior Member Blademrk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Cardiff
    Posts
    1,108
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    17 times in 17 posts
    • Blademrk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabertooth
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core I5
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 8 Gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • onboard Intel Graphics (for now)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" Dell & 20" DELL 2005w
      • Internet:
      • 32mb/sec Sky BB

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    I had a Bismuth crystal as a Christmas present (a 2" high pyramid shaped piece) hard to believe it could be the key to powering a nuclear battery.
    Feel Free to add me to your Raptr, XFire, XBL or PSN Friend List
    My Steam Profile - Hexus Steam Community


  12. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    north worcestershire
    Posts
    100
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • ajax2061's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus max hero 8
      • CPU:
      • 6700k @4.8ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • 2 ssd and a 4TB mech
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX R9 Fury
      • PSU:
      • corsair rm1000x
      • Case:
      • nzxt 440 red and black
      • Operating System:
      • 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 3007WFP-HC
      • Internet:
      • bt fttc @76 down and 15-16 up

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    now your really have to worry about exploding iphone batterys !

  13. #27
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirano View Post
    Despite the fact that this is absolutely my area of research (I study isotope for medical purposes - physics remains the same), I've heard almost nothing about this! :s

    Rest assured though that it's not going to be a 'mini-chernobyl.' This is going to involve harnessing the decay energy from bismuth-212 and using that to power a device. Quite how, I honestly don't know.

    In order to turn it into a nuclear bomb, you'd need material that was fissionable and someway of getting it to achieve critical mass (usually a ball of C4 surrounding the fissionable core.) No device as small as a watch could be turned into a weapon that could 'blow half a city up.' Sufficient energy just isn't there in the material!

    Edit: Further poking around on the internet indicates that a 'nuclear battery' would run of the nuclear decay of a long-lived excited state of Bi-212 which the hope to somehow force to release its energy on cue.

    In short, nothing to do with nuclear fission. Nothing to do with nuclear bombs!

    So let's stop the unnecessary fear mongering before it really gets going and admire the coolness of technology, k?
    When did thee folk here all of a sudden lose their sense of humour????

    Must've decayed like Bi -212

  14. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    150
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    25 times in 12 posts
    • Kirano's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P67A-GD53 (B3)
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 2500K
      • Storage:
      • 1Tb Samsung F1, 500Gb Samsung F1
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS 6970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • Antec 1200
      • Operating System:
      • Windows XP, Windows 7 Pro (64bit), Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC 27" 1920x1080p, Dell 22inch 1920X1080
      • Internet:
      • Generally okay, occasionally rubbish!

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    Quote Originally Posted by bobfoc View Post
    When did thee folk here all of a sudden lose their sense of humour????

    Must've decayed like Bi -212
    Oh, don't get me wrong, I appreciate it may have been said with humour in mind. The sad fact is though that if you mention the word 'nuclear' anywhere, in any context, many people honestly believe that it must be going to cause/create...
    1) Another Chernobyl
    2) A nuclear bomb


  15. #29
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    The first post I made in the thread was about a Plutonium power pacemaker that someone has been using for 34 years.

  16. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    150
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    25 times in 12 posts
    • Kirano's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P67A-GD53 (B3)
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 2500K
      • Storage:
      • 1Tb Samsung F1, 500Gb Samsung F1
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS 6970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • Antec 1200
      • Operating System:
      • Windows XP, Windows 7 Pro (64bit), Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC 27" 1920x1080p, Dell 22inch 1920X1080
      • Internet:
      • Generally okay, occasionally rubbish!

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    The first post I made in the thread was about a Plutonium power pacemaker that someone has been using for 34 years.
    I had noticed CAT-THE-FIFTH! And a good post it was too!

    What intrigues me is that - Bi-212 has a half-life of 1hr, as compared to the Plutonium pacemaker you mention which has a much much much longer half-life (thus it's completely understandable that they have used it to power devices!) How something with such a short half-life could be used to power a device like a phone battery for many many years is competely knew to me - and assure you that the technology would be very, very different from that which powered the pace-maker, the Voyager satellites and the mirad of other applications there have been of long-lived radioactive isotopes!

    tl;dr - No one's been ignoring your post Cat, it's just that what they're talking about in this research is very different!

    Edit: oh and I get as well that this may have been in response to my above post #28. In which case, further kudos to you!

  17. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    146
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    I hope it's not made in China.

  18. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Kingdom of Fife (Scotland)
    Posts
    4,991
    Thanks
    393
    Thanked
    220 times in 190 posts
    • crossy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabertooth X99
      • CPU:
      • Intel 5830k / Noctua NH-D15
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 850Pro NVMe, 1TB Samsung 850EVO SSD, 1TB Seagate SSHD, 2TB WD Green, 8TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix GTX970OC
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750 (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster HAF932 (with wheels)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit, Ubuntu 16.04LTS
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG Flattron W2361V
      • Internet:
      • VirginMedia 200Mb

    Re: News - Portable nuclear battery a step closer

    Quote Originally Posted by eugenius View Post
    I hope it's not made in China.
    OMG can you imagine the Daily Mail coverage on that?! "Yellow Peril Assault and Battery", etc.

    Actually I remember reading a short sci-fi story where the "black hats" did exactly that - they sold the west dirt cheap power packs then held them/us to ransom by threatening to explode clusters of them.

    Career status: still enjoying my new career in DevOps, but it's keeping me busy...

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •