Yes, I know this is a dropped topic, but I couldn't let this little bit go - no I didn't "misunderstand on purpose". I'm from a computing generation one step onwards from the esteemed Saracen (so that's ZX81, Vic20's and just missing out on use of punched cards - although I did have hours of "fun" with tape drives and oldie Digital/DEC RL02 drives - if you don't have to Google that last reference dear reader then you are officially "old"). Saracen's comments about the evolution of the word "app" apply.
And yes, I took this whole conversation as being a good natured debate - no insults given nor received. Actually quite refreshing to hear another view point well argued.
And now I'll shut up and go back to remembrances of the kind of GUI's possible on storage tube technology... (look up Tektronix 4014 or 4052 if you're interested).
There are no games in Win8. If you visit the store, there is a Metro-only Minesweeper app from Microsoft Game Studios. My image is Minesweeper from sgt-puzzles.
There is no non-Metro video player in Win8. Media Player is now Metro only. Click a video file, get Metro. You need to use third party apps for non-Metro video playback.I use VLC on my WinXP machine as well, it's just better than Media Player.
If your argument is predicated on being wrong, yes.So actually there's no difference?
Minesweeper is just a stand alone exe isn't it? Just copy it over if you really can't live without it.
I still don't really get your objection to downloading VLC or similar, it's what everyone has always done with Windows.
It's no different from downloading Acrobat, it's just one of those things you do when you have a fresh install.
I mean it's fairly obvious that you have to download third party programs to do anything productive with your PC.
It's like saying Windows 7 is broken because you have to download a third party app to replace Microsoft Paint.
I don't really see the argument that Minesweeper or a Video Player are integral parts of an operating system.
Perhaps ironically, that isn't part of what bothers me.
I've always felt Windows, as an OS, had a lot of padding, from minesweeper, to cut-down 3rd-party defraggers.
Personally, I'd rather all the stuffing was optional, and didn't install unless you wanted it, or at least, could be deselected prior to install (without using 3-rd party tools to strip out a custom install). If so, I'd have deselected Media Player and, for that matter, the defragger, because I use VLC and the full-blown commercial defragger.
Personally, I draw a distinction between the freebies, and the core OS UI.
There's an expectation of that functionality though - and a lot of people will use them. See Internet Explorer, Media Player.
Me (you) - us? Of course we'll know the alternatives and use those instead but don't think of it as the majority. Quite happy to have the install minimum then go online for the extras model though myself.
It's always a calculated risk though removing stuff from software - someone will complain. Always.
A MUI video player isn't the problem - it's closing the darn thing and getting back to the desktop..
Had reason to go into an office recently...they'd bought some new machines as they had taken on extra staff, they of course came with Win 8. Was very very funny to find that people were sharing XP machines that were as slow as a one legged tortoise with cramp whilst the "silly tiles" and "no start menu" machines were on but idle...
Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!
I find this troubling though, we keep having to deal with these one size fits all solutions because of the majority focus. I'd prefer an approach that at least provides those that are capable with the options for their own set of programs that come with the base operating system. Include all of the above for all installations sold with hardware but give the ones installing it the choice of what they include.
Agreed, that annoyed me the most when first using Windows 8. It made the desktop feel like an after thought.
Intel i7 8700K delidded | Asus TUF Z370 Gaming Plus | Palit GTX980 SuperJetStream 4Gb | Samsung 840 EVO 240Gb | Samsung 1Tb F2 | WD 1Tb & 2Tb | Corsair 750TX v2 | 32Gb Corsair Vengence | Saitek Cyborg EVO F.S. | Zalman MS800 | Corsair K90 | AOC 27" 2560x1440 |AOC 24" HD | HTC Vive
“This post was written using 100% recycled words.”
dangel (22-05-2013)
Nobody noticed, honest
You would, understandably - but i'd point you to the fact that MS already provides the tools you need to do just that. You can both add/remove features from Windows AND integrate software/drivers into a Windows DVD. If you can be bothered. Since hard drive space isn't a problem for most it's not worth it - that and couple with the fact that 8 is geared around not loading processes unless required (e.g. services) it's mostly a non issue for performance too. You could always be one of the three people Worldwide installing an 'N' version of Windows though
...and this is far more important than a full screen start menu or the button to launch it. I'm frustrated by the lack of realistic prioritisation by some.
Daft thing is I didn't flag it when he said that even though i've used said many times. In fact it's "Included in Windows 8 and Windows 8 Pro" according to MS themselves.
Ironically - MS also do a version of Minesweeper for free in their store (along with solitaire et al) so aside from downloading it that's wrong too. Ars sums up what's available here: http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2012/1...-of-windows-8/
They do, that is news to me... How is it done? I'm currently seeing how well Steam works in Ubuntu and playing some of my games available in Linux but I won't be staying on Linux, far more problems for me to overcome in Ubuntu than in Windows 8 so I suspect I'll spend less time in Ubuntu than I did in Windows 8. It would be awesome to have a go at stripping the stuff I don't like out of my Windows installation.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)