Maybe I'm missing something but I don't really get why being soldered over MXM makes it something special? It will be inside something like an iMac and probably never seen by the user either way - but at least MXM is upgradeable.
Maybe I'm missing something but I don't really get why being soldered over MXM makes it something special? It will be inside something like an iMac and probably never seen by the user either way - but at least MXM is upgradeable.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
It's by some distance the highest performing graphics part to ever be directly attached to a system motherboard (AFAIK, anyway). The fact that a company has made a design decision that they're going to permanently attach a high end GPU to a motherboard, rather than simply provide an MXM slot that can have any compatible GPU shoved in it, is newsworthy in and of itself, IMO.
OTOH it's a bit odd that they'd go for a soldered on graphics solution but not choose a BGA CPU - there's plenty of high-end BGA chips available from Intel if you go down the Xeon embedded route, and this looks like a perfect platform for those...
I reckon it's a matter of maximising performance/cost, for example comparing Intel's cheapest Skylake quad core BGA chip, the i5 6440HQ (2.6/3.5GHz 4C4T) for $250 to the LGA1151 i5 6600 (3.3/3.9GHz 4C4T) for $213.
Then there's Intel's cheapest BGA Skylake Xeon, the E3 1505M (2.8/3.7GHz 4C8T) for $434
Also on the subject of oddness, is the use of mini PCIe slots rather than M.2, considering that other manufactures have made the move half a year ago.
Last edited by DDY; 09-06-2016 at 01:18 AM.
I'm not being deliberately contrary, I just don't think something being presented in different packaging for essentially the same product is particularly interesting. Maybe it's just me? :shrug:
This is pretty cool but also probably pretty hot.
I guess if you have watercooling it's fine?
Why make this? seriously why?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)