Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 49 to 52 of 52

Thread: Nvidia encourages retailers to look after gamers

  1. #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    3,526
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked
    468 times in 326 posts

    Re: Nvidia encourages retailers to look after gamers

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    RAM production has always gone through cycles of price hikes followed by oversupply.

    It isn't surprising that people don't want to build a new fab to make more ram (the only way to improve the situation) when building that fab will drop prices making it difficult to get the money back from building the fab.
    I was just reading this Reuters article from a few weeks ago and it's not like they're not making a tidy profit that could be spent on new fabs instead of investors...
    Macquarie estimates Samsung’s chip division’s operating profit margin jumped to 47 percent last year from 26.5 percent in 2016, and will rise further to 55.5 percent this year.

  2. #50
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,009
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,568 times in 1,325 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Nvidia encourages retailers to look after gamers

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    I was just reading this Reuters article from a few weeks ago and it's not like they're not making a tidy profit that could be spent on new fabs instead of investors...
    Not sure what the cost of a new memory fab would be these days, but $10B is the sort of magnitude.

  3. #51
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    35,185
    Thanks
    3,126
    Thanked
    3,179 times in 1,926 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1050
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy

    Re: Nvidia encourages retailers to look after gamers

    Soon, the warranty hit rate will smash into the manufacturers.

    Gamers, even utterly devoted gamers, cant put the ram through what mining puts ram through. And the memory controller too. The heat build up, 24/7 is a thing to behold/feel

    And because the Retailers will have to deal with the first slew of the warranty claims, it's going to get v v ugly I think -

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  4. #52
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Nvidia encourages retailers to look after gamers

    With the prices retailers have been charging (particularly in the US), they could almost afford to replace every one out of their own pocket and still keep a tidy profit!

    Edit: I suppose if you have to find an upside to this mess, AIBs are likely to ensure effective cooling for ancillary components. I remember with the last bubble, there were a few models of cards where the fans (being stupidly+needlessly run at 100% 24/7 and expected to survive for years) were failing due to e.g. lost lubrication. I don't recall hearing similar complaints lately, so perhaps card longevity is being taken more seriously to avoid the risk of a massive influx of failed cards due to cheaping out on cooling, VRMs, fans, etc?
    Last edited by watercooled; 01-02-2018 at 07:21 PM.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •