Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 49 to 52 of 52

Thread: Apple iMac and iPad Pro updated with M1 CPUs

  1. #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    1,721
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    243 times in 223 posts
    • kompukare's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V LX
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-3570K
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 8GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 850 EVo 500GB | Corsair MP510 960GB | 2 x WD 4TB spinners
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sappihre R7 260X 1GB (sic)
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650 Gold TruePower (Seasonic)
      • Case:
      • Aerocool DS 200 (silenced, 53.6 litres)l)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10-64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x ViewSonic 27" 1440p

    Re: Apple iMac and iPad Pro updated with M1 CPUs

    Well, while having the memory in the packaging has brought the M1 great memory performance for their workload (the IGP is even more impressive than the CPU) Apple being Apple you have to wonder if putting it in their with zero ability to upgrade was solely for technical reasons.

    Sure, a hierarchy of memory would be harder to manage but someone wanted to I see no reason why the 8GB onboard could not be supplemented by a SoDIMM or two.

    Or even if the hierarchy was supplemented with some NVMe SSDs / Optane etc. to use as super fast swap (although swap and wearing out the build-in SSD is probably a sore point for anyone who has bought a M1 device - another brilliant bit of planned obsolescence by Apple as the SSD is soldered on too AFAIK).

    Everyone watches Apple, so I expect more of that kind of throw-away consumer junk with planned obsolescence. All the more pity that ARM / Qualcomm etc. are nowhere near the M1 in terms of CPU performance.

  2. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Apple iMac and iPad Pro updated with M1 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by kompukare View Post
    Well, while having the memory in the packaging has brought the M1 great memory performance for their workload (the IGP is even more impressive than the CPU) Apple being Apple you have to wonder if putting it in their with zero ability to upgrade was solely for technical reasons.

    Sure, a hierarchy of memory would be harder to manage but someone wanted to I see no reason why the 8GB onboard could not be supplemented by a SoDIMM or two.

    Or even if the hierarchy was supplemented with some NVMe SSDs / Optane etc. to use as super fast swap (although swap and wearing out the build-in SSD is probably a sore point for anyone who has bought a M1 device - another brilliant bit of planned obsolescence by Apple as the SSD is soldered on too AFAIK).

    Everyone watches Apple, so I expect more of that kind of throw-away consumer junk with planned obsolescence. All the more pity that ARM / Qualcomm etc. are nowhere near the M1 in terms of CPU performance.
    Yes and Yes. But Qualcomm etc. are pretty close in performance, Apple just optimized for their own OS and put a lot of transistors in to do that. The soldered components are just par for the course with Apple. I'm getting a lot of mates and people asking me about issues they are having now with machines that are close to the end of their Applecare and actually getting Apple to fix them. Preferred action now seems to be forcing you to "upgrade" to a new system. I have no issues with soldered stuff if that how they want to play it, but to then quibble the care plan you take out because you know this could happen is just plain wrong
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  3. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: Apple iMac and iPad Pro updated with M1 CPUs

    Linus not happy with Apple again....

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U59OzyB6lBM
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  4. #52
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,160
    Thanks
    297
    Thanked
    188 times in 147 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus TUF B450M-plus
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB @ 3.2 Gt/s
      • Storage:
      • Crucial P5 1TB (boot), Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980ti
      • PSU:
      • Fractal Design ION+ 560P
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H

    Re: Apple iMac and iPad Pro updated with M1 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    Shows how long it's been since I stared at a Pi circuit board, you are dead right it isn't stacked. OTOH, that looks like a BGA chip on my Pi 4. I wouldn't expect it to fail, so that's not really an issue, but it would be a real git to replace for upgrade. That seems a good compromise in something as cheap as a Pi 4, but upgradable ram and storage was the first thing I looked for when getting my son a laptop recently.

    I recently replaced my Android tablet for the simple reason that the old Nvidia one only has 2GB of ram and that just doesn't seem to be enough these days. My old phone seemed to be getting iffy with 3GB. Things becoming obsolete through simple lack of ram annoys the heck out of me.
    And all the apple fanboys cry "but it's really fast RAM!", as if that makes up for the pagefile hammering the soldered SSD...

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    And bang, right there, is what I've been saying. A cheap SBC or a small board I'll take the ram being fixed. But after that - nope I won't. The 8 gig fruity devices will be passed off when they no longer run stuff to someone who thinks they are getting a bargain

    This is one reason Windows ARM struggles. No decent chip (see post about Ryzen performance down at the same power levels) and then being stuck with zero upgrades. Until someone produces a decent chip it's not going to happen, the demand isn't there, repeat until end
    Windows on ARM is basically set for 99% of computing, i.e. as a bootloader for your browser of choice. Especially once we get the ARMV9 chips (for future proofing), they'll be very useable

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •