Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: AMD File Antitrust Complaint Against Intel In The US

  1. #1
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    14,268
    Thanks
    286
    Thanked
    828 times in 468 posts
    • Steve's system
      • CPU:
      • Intel i3-350M 2.27GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GiB Crucial DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 320GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Intel HD3000
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 11.10

    AMD File Antitrust Complaint Against Intel In The US

    AMD has today announced that it has filed an antitrust complaint against Intel in the US Federal District Court. AMD claim that actions from Intel such as putting pressure on customers to only use Intel chips and punishing those who do support AMD are illegal. "For most competitive situations, this is just business. But from a monopolist, this is illegal" remarks Hector Ruiz, AMD Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer.

    In a 48 page complaint [PDF] filed with the US Federal District Court, AMD makes numerous claims of how Intel has maintained its market strength, including paying Dell and Toshiba to not do business with AMD.

    Essentially, AMD's argument is that Intel provides significant financial favours (often in the form of rebates or price cuts) to companies exclusively selling Intel chips and attempts to prevent companies from taking on AMD chips by taking away those benefits.

    There are other claims beyond this, including suggestions that Intel's compilers were designed to run with degraded performance on AMD CPUs.

    If reading a 48 page complaint doesn't appeal to you, then AMD have outlined the complaint in a press release and have created a fair and open competition section on their website.

    What does this all mean for us mere consumers? Hector Ruiz spells it out:

    "Intel's illegal actions hurt consumers - everyday. Computer buyers pay higher prices inflated by Intel's monopoly profits. Less innovation is produced because less competition exists. Purchasers lose their fundamental right to choose the best technology available."

    It is certainly interesting to note that AMD have done a lot of the innovating recently. x86 was extended by them to include 64-bit support and also integrated the system memory controller into the CPU die, essentially doing away with the front side bus. Seemingly, Intel follow AMD when necessary, just in time to prevent big customers considering taking onboard some of AMD's innovative technology.

    This case, the outcome of which could be extremely significant, is definitely one to watch.
    Last edited by Steve; 28-06-2005 at 10:27 AM.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Way to go AMD!

    Kickem where it hurts, in the bank balance

  3. #3
    Real Ultimate Power! Grey M@a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    4,625
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked
    156 times in 139 posts
    • Grey M@a's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 7
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K (With H100i cooling)
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB DDR3 (2 x 8GB)
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 Pro 128GB SSD, 1TB Cavier Black WD HD, 4TB Cavier Black WD HD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI R9 390X Gaming Edition 8GB
      • PSU:
      • SuperFlower Leadex GOLD 850W Fully Modular
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" LG 24GM77-B 144Hz
      • Internet:
      • 100MB Virgin Media Cable
    Will be kicked out of court probably, the amount of money both companies can fling at this wothout even denting the bank balance they will fight it out for months and then just give up.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    176
    Thanks
    173
    Thanked
    18 times in 8 posts
    I for one am very interested to see what happens. It winds me up a treate with unfair business practices and I admire AMD for comming out with the better chip dispite Intels dominance (although I would like to add that the Pentium M + centrino is my mobile chipset of choice). I laughed hard when Tiny went under stating that their Intel-only policy was one of the main reasons.

  5. #5
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    14,268
    Thanks
    286
    Thanked
    828 times in 468 posts
    • Steve's system
      • CPU:
      • Intel i3-350M 2.27GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GiB Crucial DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 320GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Intel HD3000
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 11.10
    Quote Originally Posted by McEwin
    I admire AMD for comming out with the better chip dispite Intels dominance (although I would like to add that the Pentium M + centrino is my mobile chipset of choice).
    I also like how Pentium M is more P!!! than it is P4... TRUE innovation . Intel does some good things, and the sheer range of dual core stuff they have in the works is impressive, but some of the tactics they use to keep AMD the underdog worry me. Of course, there are other issues. For example, any change won't happen overnight. AMD can't all of a sudden meet the demand of 50% of the x86 CPU market...
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • oralpain's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI "Blood Iron" P35-T2RL
      • CPU:
      • Intel Pentium E2140 @ 400x8 (3.2GHz), 1.375v
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 CL4 @ 500MHz (DDR 1000), 4-4-4-12-T2, 2.3v
      • Storage:
      • 2x Seagate ST3250410AS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVIDIA 8800GTS (G92) 512 @ 783MHz core, 1836MHz shader, 1053Mhz memory, stock cooling 70% fan speed
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic SS-500GB
      • Case:
      • Antec P182, with some small modifications
      • Monitor(s):
      • ASUS VW222U
      • Internet:
      • Time Warner "Road Runner" Cable - 16 megabit downstream, 1 megabit upstream
    Big business is all about manipulation and deception within the confines of a system. It seems resonably clear that Intel broke the laws of this system and that AMD was justified in bringing this to the courts.

    I'll just sit back and hope that whatever comes of this will increase competition. I could do with some cheaper PC parts.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Nero vision express saying:'Burn process failed'
    By johnnr892 in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-12-2005, 11:43 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-03-2005, 12:05 PM
  3. Do you get an 'XP rating' applied when you o/c?
    By Austin in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 11-12-2003, 03:10 PM
  4. SFF FAQ And Drivers - Updated 13th June 2004
    By XTR in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-08-2003, 02:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •