GD Hardware has interviewed Ageia over recent claims from Havoc that GPUs are up to the task of dealing with physics in games.That's interesting, given the number of CPU-bound games we see these days, though that's not to say that highly advanced physics won't be too much for a GPU.GD: What sort of quantifiable difference do you believe there will be between running game physics on a GPU/CPU vs. your PhysX PPU?
Manju: We have demos which already show in a game setting how much more physics there is with GPU + CPU + PhysX processor versus only GPU (dual) + CPU (dual core). We will be making these available shortly and believe me you will be pleased.
The first thing we expect gamers would notice is their graphics get worse in the former scenario. The GPU is sacrificing graphics cycles for physics, and we don’t believe graphics cards are sitting idle during games today or will be in the foreseeable future. Running a PhysX card along with one of those high-end cards will obviously give you the best physics AND graphics experience, which is the dream of developers and gamers alike.