6 years!? Yeah, I was with RedHotAnt too and also took advantage of the ISDN channel bonding. And when they withdrew the channel bonding support, my brother bought another ISDN card and we then used a single channel each or employed software bonding... Eee, those where the days... Honest!Originally Posted by TheAnimus
I've switched from Pipex to Eclipse. My line was estimated to support at least 5Mb/s and initially 5100-5600 kbps sync was exactly what I got... Until I switched out my crappy filters for a pair of Speedtouch ones, when my sync suddenly jumped to 7612 kbps!
Transfer speeds are generally better than expected, given all the complaints atm. Speedtest are indicating at least 2000 kbps, even during the peak periods, although I am yet to see more than 4000 kbps, even in the wee hours.
Eclipse appear to have implemented a speed cap via traffic shaping during the day and evening which limits P2P to a global pool of 30 kbytes/s. I'm use header encryption for BitTorrent stuff and am able to saturate available bandwidth, but I'm a good boy; I schedule my transfers to run full-bore overnight, throttled during the day and paused during peak hours. My housemate also uses aMule (i.e. no encryption options), but the speed caps do not seem to be in effect at night, so thats fine!
I'm on the Evo 2 package, so I can't complain. It won't be long before almost all ISPs are employing more stringent load balancing, esp. if 'Max' uptake remains strong and BT don't do something about their rather limited infrastructure. For the price, I think Eclipse's approach is pretty sensible and a hell of a lot fairer than the likes of Pipex - hardly a joke!