Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 33 to 37 of 37

Thread: E8400 or E2160 or Q6600?

  1. #33
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    11,193
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked
    1,091 times in 833 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper 2 @ 3466MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: E8400 or E2160 or Q6600?

    Quote Originally Posted by duffy View Post
    Hello all.
    I suggest that if you can afford it get the Q6600.I have one on a Asus P5Q-deluxe OC'ed to 3.25GHZ with no voltage increases and everything on auto and stock heatsink and fan.My system goes into a reboot loop @ 3.50GHZ without touching anything in the bios.I will be trying later to see how high I can go and still be able to boot and run stable without touching any bios settings other than the fsb.The Q6600 will burn a movie,surf the web,download files from the net and unzip a 7GB winzip game file and run @ 54-57 Celcius.From the reviews if read about the i7 series cpu, the price versus performance increases is just not worth it.For most games right now a good dual core(say e8600)is more than enough for now.I went with the Q6600 as I do a lot of burning and video converting and I wanted the extra oomph of the four cores for that,also I will not have to worry about upgrading for a couple of years at the least.Besides most games are more gpu intensive than cpu(i7 940 with a ati radeon 3500 series is gonna be slower and choppy playing crysis on high,but change the gpu to a Geforce 285 and your gonna crank)For example I play crysis,left4dead,oblivian,metal gear,jericho all on high setting(game auto selected)and all play fine.So in short buy what you need but plan so ya dont have to upgrade for at least 2 yrs at the current level of software develpment.In real life apps anything faster than the Q6600 is just a wast of money,considering if heard claims of the Q6600 being over clocked to 4.0GHZ on high quality air or liquid cooling and matching the i7 940 in performance and sometimes beating it out with the right memory,gpu,cooling and motherboard.
    this thread is over a year old...

  2. #34
    Synergy leverager
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    /dev/dsk/c1d0s7
    Posts
    1,051
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    31 times in 27 posts
    • Mutley's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Abit IP-35 Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel QX9650 (OC'd to 3.8Ghz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (4x2GB) G.Skill DDR2-1066 8500CL5D
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840EVO 250GB SSD & Samsung HD501LJ 500GB SATA
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX 660
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Infiniti 650W
      • Case:
      • Antec P-182
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • NEC 20WGX2
      • Internet:
      • 60MB Cable (Virgin)

    Re: E8400 or E2160 or Q6600?

    But still quite useful...as I'm wondering about the same things (yes, I actually live in a time warp, approximately a year behind every one else).

  3. #35
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: E8400 or E2160 or Q6600?

    Things are a bit different now with the Phenom II available. The Phenom II X3 720 is a good choice at £120 and the Phenom II X3 710 is available for around £100. The E5200 is available for under £60 and is a good overclocker. The Athlon X2 7750+ is faster than the E5200 at stock speeds and is a better choice than the E5200 if no overclocking is involved.
    The Q6600 is the only processor still relevant but it now costs more and the newer Q660 processors are worst overclockers than the older one. To further compound things the Q6600 is sandwiched between the Phenom II X4 810 and Phenom II X4 920 which offer better or similar performance at stock speeds and also are good overclockers in their own right.

  4. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    375
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    19 times in 15 posts
    • Maccer101's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Foxconn G33
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 + Scythe Infinity
      • Memory:
      • 2gb Samsung PC-5300
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung F1 + 250gb WD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 8800gt OC 512mb
      • PSU:
      • Corsair VX450
      • Case:
      • Antec Mini P180
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 8.04
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SW223BW + Dell 19"
      • Internet:
      • 10mb Virgin Broadband

    Re: E8400 or E2160 or Q6600?

    My Q6600 at stock speed runs at av. core temp of 30c idle, measured with 3 different apps and at 50c running Prime for 10mins with case fans running pretty much silent (2 intake 1 exhaust) so these temps are totally achievable. It is essentialy winter though...

    Darn.. just noticed the age of the thread too
    HTPC1 - Coolermaster CM330, E2180 + Zalman 9500AT, GA-P31-DS3L, 2x1Gb PC6400 , Antec Earthwatts 430w , Fujitsu 2.5" 40gb HDD, 8600gt, Hannspree 32" LCD TV - Kubuntu 8.04

    HTPC2 - Silverstone TJ-08, Asus 690g, Athlon LE1300 + OCZ Vanquisher, 2x512mb PC5300, Dell 350w PSU, Fujisu 2.5" 40gb HDD, 8600gt, Toshiba 33" CRT TV - Ubuntu 8.04

    Laptop- Lenovo T41, Pentium M 1.6ghz, 768mb PC2700 RAM, 40gb HDD - Ubuntu 8.10

    NAS - Dell Case, Jetway J7F5 Mini-ITX, 1gb PC5300, Enermax Pro 82+ 425w, 1TB Hitachi - FreeNAS 0.69 on 256mb CF

  5. #37
    . bledd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,886
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked
    135 times in 85 posts

    Re: E8400 or E2160 or Q6600?

    q6600

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Q6600 vs E8400 for gaming
    By rob4001 in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 04-11-2008, 09:58 AM
  2. IP35 and E2160
    By MrP in forum abit.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-01-2008, 06:02 PM
  3. Would my existing PSU/RAM be fine for Q6600 Upgrade
    By jonathan_phang in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-11-2007, 10:37 PM
  4. E6850 or Q6600?
    By vegettoxp in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 20-07-2007, 12:12 PM
  5. £48.48 Intel E2160 (with googlecheckout)
    By Bizarre in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 13-05-2007, 05:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •