Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 32 of 32

Thread: Chainging Chips around

  1. #17
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Quote Originally Posted by handscombmp View Post


    I have been using coretemp.
    Mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooose!

    Seems strange. My Q6600 does not seem to be doing that. Have you turned off EIST and any other energy saving technologies?? If the BIOS is locked use RMClock.

  2. #18
    handscombmp
    Guest

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    Mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooose!

    Seems strange. My Q6600 does not seem to be doing that. Have you turned off EIST and any other energy saving technologies?? If the BIOS is locked use RMClock.
    That what i thought as mine is fine even with the savings turned on.
    I'll go and change them now and have a look.

  3. #19
    handscombmp
    Guest

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Just been and looked and i can't see anywhere to disable them but i can change the FSB. Weird!

    In the bios if i change the CPU voltage the default and lowest it will go it 1.25V but when i look at hardware monitoring it says 1.33.

    I also ran realtemp and under settings it says
    v core min 1.16
    V core max 1.3

    EDIT: Just ran RMClock and it says the start up voltage is 1.3 and the minium is 1.16 with a multiplier of 6X.
    Last edited by handscombmp; 15-03-2009 at 04:45 PM.

  4. #20
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    In RMClock under Advanced CPU settings you can disable the low power states and the CPU will stop down clocking on the fly.

  5. #21
    handscombmp
    Guest

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    In RMClock under Advanced CPU settings you can disable the low power states and the CPU will stop down clocking on the fly.
    Went to do that and C1E is already disabled but the option to disable the EIST is greyed out?

  6. #22
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Uncheck all the boxes in the low power states pane and then use Core Temp and see what you get.

  7. #23
    handscombmp
    Guest

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Everything in there is already unchecked and it comes up with the moving VID core in coretemp.

  8. #24
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    This is really strange!!

  9. Received thanks from:


  10. #25
    handscombmp
    Guest

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    I know. And annoying.

    Lets just say though that the VID is 1.3.
    I know we can't say for certain but which of the two chips would probaly it be best to overclock with.

  11. #26
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • rkingb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P43
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 3.1GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Geil DDR2 6400
      • Storage:
      • 640GB WD SATA2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX 8800GTS
      • Case:
      • CM590 modded
      • Operating System:
      • XP Pro X64

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Quote Originally Posted by Pob255 View Post
    Also be aware that a lot of the g0 that didn't overclock so well for whatever reason got shipped out to OEM builds so even though it's fine at stock it may not overclock so well.
    Don't quite understand this comment. Are you suggesting Intel check every CPU for overclocking?

  12. #27
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • rkingb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P43
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 3.1GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Geil DDR2 6400
      • Storage:
      • 640GB WD SATA2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX 8800GTS
      • Case:
      • CM590 modded
      • Operating System:
      • XP Pro X64

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Quote Originally Posted by handscombmp View Post
    I know. And annoying.

    Lets just say though that the VID is 1.3.
    I know we can't say for certain but which of the two chips would probaly it be best to overclock with.
    You have not said which mobo and bios u are using, but coretemp VID should not change.

  13. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,198
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked
    79 times in 70 posts

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Quote Originally Posted by rkingb View Post
    Don't quite understand this comment. Are you suggesting Intel check every CPU for overclocking?
    Well if you think about it the E2xxx series are same chips as E6xxx series, its the quality of the chip at clocking and its vid power state that defines where it is speed binned. Speed binning is overclocking to see what spec the chip has come out at, the ones that barely made 2.4 in the correct vid would go to oems. in quads.

  14. #29
    handscombmp
    Guest

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Quote Originally Posted by rkingb View Post
    You have not said which mobo and bios u are using, but coretemp VID should not change.
    When i come to overclocking it will be on a Abit P35 Pro XE board with the latest bios.

  15. #30
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • rkingb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P43
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 3.1GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Geil DDR2 6400
      • Storage:
      • 640GB WD SATA2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX 8800GTS
      • Case:
      • CM590 modded
      • Operating System:
      • XP Pro X64

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    I think that you are confusing marketing with technology, E2xxx are simply a way of selling old E6xxx chips at an acceptable price to the consumer. How exactly do you believe speed binning can be applied to individual CPU's so that they can be passed to OEM's?

  16. #31
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • rkingb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P43
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 3.1GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Geil DDR2 6400
      • Storage:
      • 640GB WD SATA2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX 8800GTS
      • Case:
      • CM590 modded
      • Operating System:
      • XP Pro X64

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Quote Originally Posted by handscombmp View Post
    When i come to overclocking it will be on a Abit P35 Pro XE board with the latest bios.
    Fair enough but what system are you getting the variable VID readings from?

  17. #32
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • rkingb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P43
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 3.1GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Geil DDR2 6400
      • Storage:
      • 640GB WD SATA2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX 8800GTS
      • Case:
      • CM590 modded
      • Operating System:
      • XP Pro X64

    Re: Chainging Chips around

    Sorry going to bed now...
    handscompbmp - with an Abit X35 you should be able to get a good overclock - at least 3GHz with good cooling. I used to get that with an old Asus P5B and my G0 Q6600 - and the chip was undervolted.
    Good luck with the overclock an the GF.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Chips glorious chips
    By shadowmaster in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 16-09-2008, 07:55 AM
  2. The best chips ever debate
    By Steven W in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 13-05-2008, 09:10 PM
  3. PWM chips on boards
    By nope in forum abit.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 29-09-2006, 10:13 AM
  4. PWM chips on boards
    By nope in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 15-09-2006, 04:01 PM
  5. Apple to ship Macs with Intel Chips?
    By Steve in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-06-2005, 01:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •