Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678
Results 113 to 122 of 122

Thread: Optical Storage Comparison

  1. #113
    jim
    jim is offline
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,464
    Thanks
    614
    Thanked
    1,648 times in 1,309 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: Optical Storage Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by ik9000 View Post
    I think your current SSD cost is wrong. Sanddisk 960GB = 19.8p per GB atm and recent sales saw the Samsung EVO 1TB down at £185 (18.5p per GB) which it will soon be normally.

    No need to compress the whole chart, but with a small increase in the Y-axis cut-off they now start to appear
    My rule for optical discs has been the cheapest Verbatim on Amazon, and likewise my unpublished rule for the other devices has been cheapest reliable brand (so for SSDs that has been Intel, Crucial, Samsung) on Scan.co.uk on the day of checking. Otherwise it gets a bit nuts. But anyway, 20p vs 22p is splitting hairs really.

  2. #114
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Optical Storage Comparison

    Probably true, although I had a file on one of my backups a couple of years back that just refused to copy, and was partly corrupted. I know it's always a possibility with any kind of media, but it made me a bit jumpy

  3. #115
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Optical Storage Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by meynardhill10 View Post
    Probably true, although I had a file on one of my backups a couple of years back that just refused to copy, and was partly corrupted. I know it's always a possibility with any kind of media, but it made me a bit jumpy
    What sort of media was it? With optical storage it's important to get decent-quality media if you're going to be using it long-term, and to store it properly i.e. kept away from light and extreme temperatures.

  4. #116
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Optical Storage Comparison

    Interesting thread. I do think you have dismissed an online backup as a viable solution. Not only is it less manual work for you but it doesn't take THAT long. I quickly calculated that 3TB of data would take about 30 days at a nowdays avg 10Mb/s upload speed. You then get all the extra benefits of a good online backup service would offer. All for £3.50 per month.

  5. #117
    The late but legendary peterb - Onward and Upward peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Looking down & checking on swearing
    Posts
    19,378
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked
    3,403 times in 2,693 posts

    Re: Optical Storage Comparison

    LTO 7 is now available. Tapes are around the £100 each for 1 5TB (compressed, 6.5TB native) so cost per GB is around 10pm which is much more than LTO6 at the moment, although prices will fall. The big plus is that speed is increased.

    Hardware costs are still high, but while LTO 6 was initially moving towards fibre channel and SAS, there are some Thunderbolt connected drives in both LTO6 and LTO 7 - mainly for external tape drives.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

    Been helped or just 'Like' a post? Use the Thanks button!
    My broadband speed - 750 Meganibbles/minute

  6. #118
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Optical Storage Comparison

    Hmm, Thunderbolt is definitely an interesting development - it makes them potentially more usable in a non-enterprise environment. Well, aside from the cost of the drive anyway...

  7. #119
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,941
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    386 times in 313 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC

    Re: Optical Storage Comparison

    For those interested in this thread for backup reasons, another way of using HDD's is to place them in a Microserver, NAS or similar and find a friend/family member that's prepared to keep it at their house. Their stuff is backed up incrementally to mine and my stuff to theirs. Snapshots are kept locally every few hours for about 1-2 months, remote site, monthly snapshots for about 2 years. This is only for files such as documents and pictures though. The rate of change is pretty small.
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  8. #120
    jim
    jim is offline
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,464
    Thanks
    614
    Thanked
    1,648 times in 1,309 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: Optical Storage Comparison

    Update 8: (15 months later)

    DVDs

    12/09: 650 DVDs @ £21 for a 100 pack - £140 - 5p/gig
    07/10: 650 DVDs @ £17 for a 100 pack - £110 - 4p/gig
    12/10: 650 DVDs @ £17 for a 100 pack - £110 - 4p/gig
    01/12: 650 DVDs @ £21 for a 100 pack - £140 - 5p/gig
    11/12: 650 DVDs @ £18 for a 100 pack - £115 - 4p/gig
    12/13: 650 DVDs @ £18 for a 100 pack - £115 - 4p/gig
    07/14: 650 DVDs @ £19 for a 100 pack - £124 - 4p/gig
    12/15: 650 DVDs @ £16 for a 100 pack - £100 - 3p/gig

    02/17: 650 DVDs @ £19 for a 100 pack - £124 - 4p/gig


    DL DVDs

    12/09: 360 DL-DVDs @ £25 for a 25 pack - £360 - 12p/gig
    07/10: 360 DL-DVDs @ £22 for a 25 pack - £315 - 10p/gig
    12/10: 360 DL-DVDs @ £18 for a 25 pack - £260 - 9p/gig
    01/12: 360 DL-DVDs @ £22 for a 25 pack - £315 - 10p/gig
    11/12: 360 DL-DVDs @ £22 for a 25 pack - £315 - 10p/gig
    12/13: 360 DL-DVDs @ £20 for a 25 pack - £290 - 10p/gig
    07/14: 360 DL-DVDs @ £20 for a 25 pack - £290 - 10p/gig
    12/15: 360 DL-DVDs @ £19 for a 25 pack - £270 - 9p/gig

    02/17: 360 DL-DVDs @ £21 for a 25 pack - £305 - 10p/gig

    25GB BDs

    12/09: 120 25GB BD-Rs @ £110 for a 25 pack - £520 - 17p/gig
    07/10: 120 25GB BD-Rs @ £110 for a 25 pack - £520 - 17p/gig
    12/10: 120 25GB BD-Rs @ £100 for a 25 pack - £480 - 16p/gig
    01/12: 120 25GB BD-Rs @ £83 for a 25 pack - £400 - 13p/gig
    11/12: 120 25GB BD-Rs @ £32 for a 25 pack - £155 - 5p/gig
    12/13: 120 25GB BD-Rs @ £31 for a 50 pack - £75 - 3p/gig
    07/14: 120 25GB BD-Rs @ £30 for a 50 pack - £72 - 2p/gig
    12/15: 120 25GB BD-Rs @ £8 for a 25 pack - £38 - 1p/gig

    02/17: 120 25GB BD-Rs @ £30 for a 50 pack - £72 - 2p/gig

    50GB BDs

    12/09: 60 50GB BD-Rs @ £220 for a 25 pack - £520 - 17p/gig
    07/10: 60 50GB BD-Rs @ £220 for a 25 pack - £520 - 17p/gig
    12/10: 60 50GB BD-Rs @ £185 for a 25 pack - £445 - 15p/gig
    01/12: 60 50GB BD-Rs @ £185 for a 25 pack - £445 - 15p/gig
    11/12: 60 50GB BD-Rs @ £144 for a 50 pack - £175 - 6p/gig
    12/13: 60 50GB BD-Rs @ £118 for a 50 pack - £140 - 5p/gig
    07/14: 60 50GB BD-Rs @ £36 for a 10 pack - £216 - 7p/gig
    12/15: 60 50GB BD-Rs @ £15 for a 10 pack - £90 - 3p/gig

    02/17: 60 50GB BD-Rs @ £83 for a 50 pack - £100 - 3p/gig

    HDDs

    12/09: 2 HD154UIs @ £75 each - £150 - 5p/gig
    07/10: 2 HD154UIs @ £60 each - £120 - 4p/gig
    12/10: 2 HD153WIs @ £52 each - £104 - 3p/gig
    01/12: 1 Deskstar 5K3000 @ £155 each - £155 - 5p/gig
    11/12: 1 Seagate ST3000 @ £100 each - £100 - 3p/gig
    12/13: 1 Toshiba DT01ACA300 @ £76 each - £76 - 3p/gig
    07/14: 1 Toshiba DT01ACA300 @ £75 each - £75 - 3p/gig
    12/15: 1 Toshiba DT01ACA300 @ £66 each - £66 - 2p/gig

    02/17: 1 Toshiba DT01ACA300 @ £78 each - £78 - 3p/gig

    SSDs

    12/09: 19 Intel 160GB SSDs @ £340 each - £6460 - 215p/gig
    07/10: 19 Intel 160GB SSDs @ £340 each - £6460 - 215p/gig
    12/10: 19 Intel 160GB SSDs @ £290 each - £5510 - 185p/gig
    01/12: 12 Intel 250GB SSDs @ £395 each - £4740 - 158p/gig
    11/12: 12 Intel 240GB SSDs @ £140 each - £1680 - 56p/gig
    12/13: 3 Crucial 960GB SSDs @ £374 each - £1120 - 37p/gig
    07/14: 6 Crucial 512GB SSDs @ £152 each - £912 - 30p/gig
    12/15: 6 Crucial 480GB SSDs @ £105 each - £630 - 22p/gig

    02/17: 6 Crucial 525GB SSDs @ £149 each - £894 - 30p/gig

    USBs

    11/12: 23 Kingston 128GB USB3 Drives @ £127 each - £2921 - 97p/gig
    12/13: 23 Corsair 128GB USB3 Drives @ £69 each - £1590 - 53p/gig
    07/14: 23 Verbatim 128GB USB3 Drives @ £39 each - £897 - 30p/gig
    12/15: 23 Corsair 128GB USB3 Drives @ £30 each - £690 - 23p/gig

    12/15: 12 Corsair 128GB USB3 Drives @ £68 each - £816 - 27p/gig

    -----

    Well, that's the most depressing update I've done so far. Every single category has seen a significant increase in price. Broadly speaking, in all categories we're looking at the same prices as 2014 (excluding BD-50 which saw a weird increase that year, perhaps an anomaly).

    I suppose the drop in the value of sterling will account for some of this, but SSDs increasing in price by 50% is way outside the bounds of that impact.

    In reference to the original question (which let's not forget was posited just over 7 years ago!), I don't think any of these methods are particularly economical for backup purposes now.

    There is now a lot of logic in using BD-50 or BD-25, and I would still have more confidence in that method in the long-run than HDD, but I can't deny that maintaining a library of them would be extremely complex - and furthermore a lot of space would likely be wasted unless I started dabbling in split archives, which requires further use of libraries or some logical system.

    Over that period, there have been three key developments to my mind. Firstly, with the advent of fibre we now have reasonable upload speeds. Secondly, whilst 3TB seemed a lot in 2009, it isn't so much in 2017, and obviously tripling your required backup size triples the cost of any of these solution. Thirdly, online 'unlimited' backup services have come onto the market with reasonable pricing.

    Crashplan is now £48 per year and Backblaze £40. Assuming that you need 9TB of storage, that would cost £215 on BD-25 (plus a Bluray drive) or £235 on HDD, which would pay for 4-5 years of online backup.

    Admittedly, online storage isn't for everyone, and I'd think very carefully before putting personal documents on the web, but then it's unlikely that this quantity of data is personal. Point is, on a cost and effort basis, I think it's hard to make the case for physical backup right now.

    Nonetheless, I find this an interesting process to catch up on how the storage world is moving so I will continue monitoring!

  9. Received thanks from:

    Biscuit (19-02-2017),Output (19-02-2017)

  10. #121
    jim
    jim is offline
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,464
    Thanks
    614
    Thanked
    1,648 times in 1,309 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: Optical Storage Comparison




  11. #122
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,478
    Thanks
    1,541
    Thanked
    1,029 times in 872 posts

    Re: Optical Storage Comparison

    The jump in SSD prices is something I've noticed myself - like you say, the exchange rate change does not account for it (as much as it's a convenient thing to blame for everything negative at the moment), and although I've not really been paying close attention to the market I wonder if it has to do with the 3D NAND transition?

    We see this sort of thing with commodity DRAM prices rising and falling sharply based on a number of factors such as supply and demand, and when a new technology is introduced it can go from a market with huge (likely peak) production capacity easily meeting demand, to one where many companies close down production lines to make space for the new technology, which reduces worldwide capacity in the interim period. New fabs are often built to try to keep up with demand, but it's likely not economically viable to keep fab space 'on standby' for transitions and let their competitors eat into market share, so it makes sense to me that the lowest prices for a given technology comes right before the new one enters production.

    It also takes some time (on the order of months) for wafers to make it through a fab even with a running production line. Add to that the time to replace equipment and the production ramp, and there could be quite a lengthy dip in shipping production volumes.

    Something else which likely exacerbates this, is the cost savings from new nodes aren't what they used to be, so while this has probably always happened to an extent, it was likely offset by the much lower cost of the newer product in the past.

    That's my understanding of the market at least, so I expect something similar is happening with SSDs at the moment. 3D is also entering the market en masse, and I imagine that takes substantially more time both for production line modifications, and the wafer processing itself as it involves more steps, which could further lengthen that gap.

    Edit: Anandtech mentions SSD prices increasing here, along with some information about future products hopefully bringing it back down again: http://www.anandtech.com/show/10903/...its-production

    Edit2: The dollar price of HDDs seems to have risen recently too. I wonder what's going on there? https://camelcamelcamel.com/Seagate-...context=browse
    Last edited by watercooled; 20-02-2017 at 12:00 AM.

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. IDE Optical drives on a SATA controller using an IDE to SATA converter
    By Skinleech in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-07-2007, 11:56 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-09-2006, 02:50 PM
  3. Microsoft Trackball Optical
    By Steve in forum Reader Reviews
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-09-2004, 05:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •