Well, my Kingston 40gb ssd arrived today. It has replaced a 500gb maxtor in my htpc, which is nice as my server has now benefitted from that 500gb drive.
There are, obviously, lots of articles out there on SDDs and what they can and can't do for a system. Lots of them involve number crunching, and don't get to what, for me, was really the nitty gritty: does it actually speed it up in ways you can appreciate, or what?
Answer: Yes.
And no.
First off: Boot. the HTPC is running a fairly naked Vista 32 Home Premium. Boot programs include ESET security, home server connector and... that's about it. Search, indexing, prefetch, quicktime, all disabled. I timed the boot from HDD and from SDD (having cloned the HDD onto the SDD). The boot time sped up from bios screen to "welcome to vista screen" by about 8 - 10 seconds (45 seconds total). The REAL increase came from going from the welcome screen to actual fully loaded vista. THis happened in a split second with the SDD. Very impressive.
Next: applications: INternet explorer opens the instant you click the icon. Wow. Itunes also v fast. Mame near instant. All very, very good.
The only app I've been disappointed with, which is a shame as this was really the reason I bought the drive, was Media Centre. It's still quicker than from an HDD, appreciably so, but not as "snappy" as the other apps.
I'm also a little gutted about Mediabrowser: I had hoped that, with the quick random read speeds, MediaCentre would be able to process all the images and DVD information quicker than an HDD. And I think it's a little quicker, but there is still an appreciable lag between opening your movie page and all the DVD covers displaying. If I use a RAM disc, this is instant, there's not lag (in the form of holding graphics) at all. However, I don't like using a ram disc as it slows the boot, having to populate it afresh each time.
I did wonder if this was a network thing, or dependant upon the read speed of my HDD server: does Media Browser have to "ask" the server that all the media files for which it has found cached image and information are still present on the server? That would account for the delay, but not explain why a RAM drive is able to show all the images and info immediately. From that, I'm concluding that a ram drive is quicker.
That aside, though, I am seriously impressed with how quick windows open, things respond, etc. There is a lot said about how "snappy" the system becomes, and, yes, I can verify that.
Anyone wants me to try anything (within reason), let me know.