Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 33 to 37 of 37

Thread: Dark Void Benchmark

  1. #33
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Dark Void Benchmark

    Quote Originally Posted by Georgy291 View Post
    just run the bench...check specs <-------

    everything is on highest and physicsX is on low and its min 2.28 and 5.5 average

    physics x now off
    min 2.11
    average 5.88

    this looks funny

    EDIT:

    even if i turn everything to low and phisicsX off it still is at 2 fps

    wtf?
    Our patented nClash stability technology(tm) detected that you had an unsupported graphics card and disabled it to prevent potential system instability.

    Nvidia - saving your system from competitors technology since 1993(tm).

  2. #34
    Senior Member Pob255's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The land of Brum
    Posts
    10,143
    Thanks
    608
    Thanked
    1,226 times in 1,123 posts
    • Pob255's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M5A99X EVO
      • CPU:
      • FX8350 & CM Hyper 212+
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 2gb Corsair Vengence 1600mhz cas9
      • Storage:
      • 512gb samsung SSD +1tb Samsung HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EGVA GTX970
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic GX 650W
      • Case:
      • HAF 912+
      • Operating System:
      • W7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • iiyama XB3270QS-B1 32" IPS 1440p

    Re: Dark Void Benchmark

    It's not just that, I've seen simular resaults from gtx275 owners while gtx260 owners are beating them.
    I think the whole benchmark is basically borked.

  3. #35
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Dark Void Benchmark

    Perhaps the tests are borked so that it can make Fermi look very impressive when compared to previous graphics cards!!

  4. #36
    Big, Mean and Ugly! circuitmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wiltshire
    Posts
    923
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked
    101 times in 95 posts
    • circuitmonkey's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8H61-M PRO
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i3 2100T
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 1333MHz XMS3
      • Storage:
      • 320GB WD Caviar Balck + 1TB Samsung EcoGreen F2 + 1TB Samsung F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 750Ti
      • PSU:
      • Corsair CX430M
      • Case:
      • NZXT M59
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro (64bit), Vista business (64 bit), XP Pro (32bit), Ubuntu (64 bit)
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" FHD + 2X 19"1280 x 1024
      • Internet:
      • BT Fibre broadband

    Re: Dark Void Benchmark

    weird,

    Just ran it on my sig. machine and at 1280x1024 got average of around 58fps (high detail, no physics) whilst at 1680x1050 I got nearly double that at 110fps (high detail, no physics) ?!?!?

  5. #37
    Big, Mean and Ugly! circuitmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wiltshire
    Posts
    923
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked
    101 times in 95 posts
    • circuitmonkey's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8H61-M PRO
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i3 2100T
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 1333MHz XMS3
      • Storage:
      • 320GB WD Caviar Balck + 1TB Samsung EcoGreen F2 + 1TB Samsung F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 750Ti
      • PSU:
      • Corsair CX430M
      • Case:
      • NZXT M59
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro (64bit), Vista business (64 bit), XP Pro (32bit), Ubuntu (64 bit)
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" FHD + 2X 19"1280 x 1024
      • Internet:
      • BT Fibre broadband

    Re: Dark Void Benchmark

    hmm, ran it again with physX enabled in control panel but not in game and got 144 @ 1280x1024 windowed and full screen 164, more respectable
    Last edited by circuitmonkey; 27-01-2010 at 05:32 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Previews - Dark Void - PC, Xbox 360, PS3
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-03-2010, 01:19 PM
  2. S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky benchmark
    By Mithrandir in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 02-03-2009, 10:41 AM
  3. Headlines - Dark Void - PC, Xbox 360, PS3
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-07-2008, 10:52 AM
  4. Dark Void
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17-07-2008, 03:41 PM
  5. Crimson Skies team journey into the Dark Void
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-10-2007, 10:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •