Electronic Centripetal Acceleration

[funnelhead]

The reverse passage takes spacetime geodesics for a nonrotating black hole in the equatorial plane (a 3-d spacetime) to motion under a central "gravitational force field". The conformal transformation to the optical metric converts the solutions to geodesics on the deformed equatorial plane (like the Jacobi reparametrization). The embedding diagrams then show the reversal of centrifugal force.


I think this explains ur problems ERU. A solution from here should be simple.

[Bindibadgi]

Uhh data transfer is just electrons through cables. Electrons dont fly down cables (well, they do, but not how you think of it) - one is pushed in on one and and one pops off the other. They fly around a 360 degree nucleus (how big is that?) at the speed of light so i seriously doubt a 90degree turn in some wire will cause em much trouble.

[funnelhead]

Eru, what do you think of the mirror and pulley system?

[ERU]

The placement of the peaks and troughs can be calculated with the following formula :

Distance(mm) = Network Speed(Mbits) / Length of run(mm) * Frequency (Hz)

The hardest part is finding the exact frequency that your data is travelling at. For that you need a data frequency combolulator. Hardware ones are the best, but there are some quite good Linux software ones available.
However if you look at it a different way i beleive IrDa with a complex series of mirrors and a pulley system is the future.

[Howard]

This thread has made me laugh. Combolulator? [prof. frink]Triii-angluator![/frink] MM GLAVEN!!

[funnelhead]

ERU, just to point out that 'combolulator' is the american spelling - i think you mean 'combolulatour'

but apart from that the theory is sound. The redhat distro is easily the best for available software combolulatours. If you get the pro package , it comes with 2 of them. I could Warez you as many copies as you need. How long is ur cable?

[Byatt]

err......if some explained to me what on earth possibilty there was of an electron falling out of a cable I'd be happy to listen.

But cos I don't KNOW if its true or rubbish, I shall keep my sense of humour plugged in.

technically there's always a possibility that you can find an electron (that was initially in the cable) outside the cable (I'm talking about outside the insulation here as well), since it's not an infinite potential barrier keeping it in there...but the probability is so goddamn small it's not even worth writing down.

I could be wrong though

[funnelhead]

you're not wrong Byatt - this thread is science-fact.



and thats what scares me the most

[hartz]

Lo all,

So the data can't get the corner, and fly's out of the cable.
However i don't want to make holes through my walls and Wireless Lan is at the moment quite expensive still so i can't afford it.

ERU

Man, there is an easy simple solution. Don't bend the cables too sharp. Get some worn car tyres and cut these open., then invert them and nail them onto the walls in the corners of the doors and other bends, so you can lay the cables in the smoothly bent troughs which form. Also use a hacksaw to cut some holes in the doors so they can still close over the tyres - much cheaper than other solutions, and catches about 99% of spilt electrons because of the smoother turns in the cables.

Also, I'm looking at some solution to replenish the cables from lost electrons because over time the copper is becomming "electron-lean", which gives it a positive charge, so it's attrackting lightningh to my house!

[funnelhead]

not to mention racoons.

[Applecrusher]

Have you tried some sheilded cables??
They cost a fair bit more.. but they will most likely work... and try this method that hartz said.. cause making the corners wider may make the electrons not want to "come off the track" lol
if that doesnt work.. try a net.. im prety sure that it would catch alot of electrons.... or even try hiring a midget or dwarf.. they could catch 'em too!!!

EDIT:
Ohh also..
the electricity doesnt travel down a gigabit cable faster than a 10 mb cable or 100 mb cable... they jsut have a much tighter timing on the little pulses (ie: they make the pulses shorter).. ill have a look in the cisco cirriclum (i need to learn to spell!) for ya...

[iranu]

Just to clarify for people who don't know, there is no such thing as electronic centripetal acceleration. Electrons are in effect massless so don't get 'thrown' about at corners. Effects of sharp bends on gigabit cable are due to cross-talk, reflection and electromagnetically-induced currents and are nothing whatsover to do with the 'data' falling out of the cable.

Actually electrons do have mass. My old Casio scientific calculator had the figure and units when pressing shift and #7.

electron mass = 9.10938188 × 10-31 kilograms (sighh google mmmn)

What he really needs is some cable that uses total internal reflection. That way the electrons are guarunteed to stay in the loop.

[Zathras]

Actually electrons do have mass.

The reason I put 'in effect' in my statement is because at the particle level, talking about centripetal acceleration is meaningless. Quantum electrodynamics is not classical newtonian mechanics, and as such having mass does not imply following classical mechanics behaviour. Heck, at that level it's a complicated issue as to whether an electron is a particle or a wave, or a bit of both as the average person would see it.

[TeePee]

Surely Heisenbergs uncertainty principle means you can't watch the electrons flying out of the cable, without them flying back in again, or something?