Read more.And then there were four.
Read more.And then there were four.
Oh dear one less choice of drives, I have avoided Hitachi ever since they bought IBM as i suffered from having several "Death-Star" drives, including a glass platter one. I guess I will now be avoiding WD, which is a shame as they were my second choice after seagate. Does this mean WD will also get Hitachi's san business?
(\__/) All I wanted in the end was world domination and a whole lot of money to spend. - NMA
(='.*=)
(")_(*)
I imagine it's mostly that, a few pieces of IP & patents and some factory capacity.
Avoiding Hitachi drives because of years old problems with DeskStar drives is uncalled for, those problems are long history and Hitachi have a good enterprise level offering, and that's where reliability counts the most.
Found the recent desktop drives to be pretty good.
had an old IBM 40gb that failed and a couple of earlier hitachis doa/failed with click of death though.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)