Read more.Will lead new Core and Visual Computing Group to develop integrated and discrete graphics.
Read more.Will lead new Core and Visual Computing Group to develop integrated and discrete graphics.
AMD must be <mod edit> bricks.
Last edited by scaryjim; 09-11-2017 at 09:37 AM. Reason: swearing policy
You think Intel destroying Nvidia's chipset business whilst denying them the ability to so much as emulate x86 in software wasn't enough? People really liked the old Nvidia Ion for Atom boards, clearly Intel had to put a stop to that too so they crippled Atom specifically so Nvidia couldn't add graphics to it. Really, it can't get any dirtier than it already is between those two so if Intel is now going after Nvidia's core markets but this time with someone who might actually be able to pull it off then things are going to get interesting.
Note also that the last legal agreement between Intel and Nvidia was signed in 2011 and lasted for 6 years, so the cease fire may be considered off.
so intel HD graphics is slowly dying away? Some geeks have been claiming intel HD graphics of the Skylake to the current era are more efficient than a similar performance tier offered by AMD or Nvidia in the 14nm process, is this claim true?
I think it is if they sell to *any* company. The license is just not transferable. That isn't a deal breaker though, Nvidia could buy AMD and run it as an independent subsidiary or they could merge the companies keeping the AMD name making Nvidia graphics cards as an AMD brand which would seem odd for a week or so then people would just accept it.
I don't see it happening though. Nvidia have Denver and right now ARM is probably more valuable than x86.
Raja is a big name (though to be fair, I only came across him recently due to AMD's PR campaigns). This will be considered by some a big loss to AMD and specifically the RTG (I wonder if AMD will relaunch the ATi brand, it would make things so much easier). I guess you could say he was the Jim Keller of RTF.
I'm no so sure I'd go that far, but maybe it's fair. Maybe he got tired of the constant uphill battle and being weighed down by AMD's lack of money and infrastructure to do really cool next level things.
Two or three years ago, people were expecting AMD to declare bankruptcy with their line riding of the Altman Z-score, yet they stuck around to lunch two separate, market invigorating, products. How much of this success is down to individuals like Keller and Raja? Does the media/PR dept's place too much emphasis on their involvement? Are they as critical as it seemed? Is AMD <mod edit>?.....up toilet creek?
The Intel/AMD deal really caught me by surprise. I suspect Intel will have this new graphics team working to resolve the necessity for AMD's involvement and dump that contract ASAP.
Also, when Keller left for that fancy Tesla group he said he left a top quality management structure in place. Raja took a Leave of Absence and the AMD boss is doing his job in the short term. I wonder how long he/AMD knew he was going to Intel and if the LoA was just to give them time to buffer his absence from hurting their stock value.
I speculated that Vega's apparent focus on Big Data and mining was an attempt to break into those markets and carve a foothold, but doing so on a desktop gpu was attempting too much with one product. Despite all the positive spin, sales just aren't what they need to be and I think AMD look to be circling the toilet.
I haven't had much sleep so I could just as well be reading way too much into this. Also, if they do go bust, maybe Samsung could buy them, that'd give Intel something to chew on.
Last edited by SylvanSagacious; 09-11-2017 at 09:43 AM. Reason: language patriarchy
MODERATOR NOTICE
Hi everyone, I've just had to edit two posts in this thread for violations of Hexus forums language policy: https://forums.hexus.net/general-dis...ease-read.html
If you only comment on news posts here you might not have fully engaged with the community feel we try to encourage throughout Hexus forums, but as these comment threads are hosted by the forums the same rules apply.
I'd strongly recommend reading the post I linked to above, regardless of whether you're a relatively new poster or an old-timer like me - we all need to occasionally remind ourselves of what we agree to by using these forums.
In particular, please note that using asterisks to censor your language is not appropriate. If you know a word needs censoring, then you know you shouldn't be using that word here, so why use it? Please find ways of expressing yourself that don't involvebase crudeness - there's always another way to get your point across.
Pah ! And I thought <mod edit> was a hip new swear !
I can't help but wonder if this bit from Raja's internal memo will still hold true:
But then again, what does "AMD technologies" actually cover? Will Raja insist on only using computers with Radeon graphics? Or could it even be defined as vaguely as AMD64? That would hold true for all current Intel processors, even though Intel insists on labeling it differently.I will continue to be an ardent fan and user of AMD technologies for both personal and professional use.
Jim Keller when he joined Tesla,not only hired some ex-AMD people,but it apparently lead to this:
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/20/tesl...-with-amd.html
AMD collaborating with Tesla on making a new chip. This probably indicates its more likely Intel will work closer with AMD,not only in licensing IP,but developing some aspects of the physical GPU development.
After all if Intel already had a decent uarch already they wouldn't be using a custom AMD chip for their high end laptop chip,so it looks like a different direction to what they were doing before.
If anything,as the chap over at HardOCP said,Intel has let go of a lot of its graphics related engineers.
So that indicates to me,they intend to either:
1.)License and use AMD base technology to implement their GPUs. AMD developes the base uarch and Intel implements their own chips based on it different to AMD.
2.)Intel buys RTG so gets all the engineers and IP.
3.)Intel buys part of RTG and shares in R and D costs.
4.)AMD developes the graphics parts of Intel CPUs.
5.)Intel developes their own base technlogy and design.
The last one has not worked as well as they probably expected,hence why the sudden change it seems.
outwar6010 (09-11-2017)
From how Intel describe his newly created role it seems to cover everything from IoT, AI, integrated graphics, and discrete graphics too compute cards.
From the sounds of it they're looking to compete in the same market that Nvidia currently operates in, although where that leaves AMD IDK.
Last edited by Corky34; 09-11-2017 at 11:37 AM.
Yes,I did - easier to copy and paste it on the phone. However,I noticed something when a mate showed me this tweet from Raja Koduri's new twitter account:
https://twitter.com/Rajaontheedge/st...27350743588864
It will be a massive understatement to say that I am beyond excited about my new role at Intel. I haven't yet seen anything written that groks the magnitude of what I am pursuing. The scale of it is not even remotely close to what I was doing before. Will say more when ready!
https://trademarks.justia.com/871/15/grok-87115592.htmlOriginally Posted by Twitter poster
Hmm,AMD just filed a trademark for GROK just recently.
So late last year,Intel and AMD joined forces for this promo:
http://techreport.com/news/31088/amd...ware-and-games
Now,Intel uses a custom AMD graphics chip,and apparently according to rumours Intel reduced the size of its graphics division last year:
https://www.kitguru.net/components/g...-future-igpus/
Something is definitely up!!
Last edited by CAT-THE-FIFTH; 09-11-2017 at 11:49 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)