Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 27 of 27

Thread: MS Small Business Server 2003

  1. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    12,184
    Thanks
    910
    Thanked
    599 times in 420 posts
    Well the idea is its going to do file/printer sharing/exchange and thats about it, for 40 machines..

    As for the array its 67Gb over the 4 disks so I think its mirrored/striped but cant get into the damned RAID BIOS to change the damned thing, rather irritating..

    Theres also about a 30 seconds login delay as well but looking at Task manager nothings hitting the CPU or the Network, any idea?

    Mite see if theres a RAID util for Windows and reconfigure the array n then reinstall..

  2. #18
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    384 times in 313 posts
    Is the machien joined to the domain ? does it have any network card that could be waiting for an IP ?
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  3. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    12,184
    Thanks
    910
    Thanked
    599 times in 420 posts
    Yes, the machine is setup on the 2k3 box and the machine uses a static ip, its the machine I usually use but I've just added it to the domain but it takes a while to log in for some reason even tho its the only box thats connected atm...

  4. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Shropshire, UK
    Posts
    175
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Moby-Dick

    Dual CPU ( not just hyper threading or dual core )
    We have been looking at xeon chips and it seems alot of them are 533mhz i take it that 800mhz FSB is the better soloution as with any P4 chip, we have found one here which if it is sutible would have 2 of them

    See The Chip Here

    What about motherboards what motherboard would be suited for this type of setup we have looked into soloutions but only found boards by supermicro with only support for 2 PCI slots which wouldnt allow expansion for extra raid cards.

    Thanks in advance
    Richard
    - Trust Me - My Current Desktop - My Rig -

  5. #21
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    384 times in 313 posts
    FSB isn't going to make as much difference as you'd think. Exatra CPu cache helps , but its not essential . What is more impoartant ( and why I recommended two physical cores ) is the number of threads that can be run , ie the number of operations the system can do at once. When you have 50 users requesting data , you want to keep the wiat queue as low as possible.

    There isn't much choice with Xeon motherboards , but Scan have one of the better selections

    http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/Produ...Thumbnails=yes
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  6. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Shropshire, UK
    Posts
    175
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Is their a motherboard that stands out from the rest , becuase as i said lots of them only have 2 PCI slots and only support 533FSB.

    Rich
    - Trust Me - My Current Desktop - My Rig -

  7. #23
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    384 times in 313 posts
    not off hand - supermicro are probably the biggest manufacturer to retail dual xeon boards though.

    http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/Produ...oductID=130608

    thats got a bit more than 2 PCI slots. on it
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  8. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Shropshire, UK
    Posts
    175
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Ah yes......

    .......1 x 64-bit 133MHz PCI-X (3.3V) slot
    2 x 64-bit 100MHz PCI-X (3.3V) slots
    1 x 32-bit 33MHz PCI (5V) slot

    Iam not sure if PCI-X raid cards/nic cards are available.

    Rich
    - Trust Me - My Current Desktop - My Rig -

  9. #25
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    384 times in 313 posts
    yes they are - pci-x isn't the same as PCI express.

    http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/Produ...oductID=277856

    would give you dual channel array support
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

  10. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Shropshire, UK
    Posts
    175
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    No i know PCI-X isnt the same as PCI-E i mean by dual channel array you mean we can attach two drives to it.

    I must thankyou moby for your support during my asking all these questions.

    Richard
    - Trust Me - My Current Desktop - My Rig -

  11. #27
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    384 times in 313 posts
    nope - dual scsi means you can attach 2 chains to the card - each scsi channel can have a number of devices attached, I think its up to 9 or so - SCSI devices are daisy chained.
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. NT4 Small Business Server Help
    By Craig in forum Software
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-09-2004, 04:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •