Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 22 of 22

Thread: SSD on the Mainboard ?

  1. #17
    Senior Member oolon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,294
    Thanks
    150
    Thanked
    302 times in 248 posts
    • oolon's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P6T6
      • CPU:
      • Xeon w3680
      • Memory:
      • 3*4GB Kingston ECC
      • Storage:
      • 160GB Intel G2 SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX HD6970 2GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850
      • Case:
      • Antec P183
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate and Centos 5
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2408WFP
      • Internet:
      • Be* Unlimied 6 down/1.2 up

    Re: SSD on the Mainboard ?

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    But your data will still be on the hard drive that it's caching.
    Ok may be I have misunderstood what they propose to do with this memory. There is of course still a risk with write back caching, that the drive and the memory will not be synced at the moment of death so I hope it has in order writing to disk, otherwise corruption would be very possible.

  2. #18
    Senior Member Pob255's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The land of Brum
    Posts
    10,143
    Thanks
    608
    Thanked
    1,226 times in 1,123 posts
    • Pob255's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M5A99X EVO
      • CPU:
      • FX8350 & CM Hyper 212+
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 2gb Corsair Vengence 1600mhz cas9
      • Storage:
      • 512gb samsung SSD +1tb Samsung HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EGVA GTX970
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic GX 650W
      • Case:
      • HAF 912+
      • Operating System:
      • W7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • iiyama XB3270QS-B1 32" IPS 1440p

    Re: SSD on the Mainboard ?

    ummm I'm sure there are some laptops that have the ssd on the motherboard, all it involves is instead of a separate plug in card you just put the same components onto the motherboard and instead of a plug you just have direct traces.
    You'd only make major savings when you combine the controller into the motherboard chipset.

    The other major factor with SSD's cost is the chips used, you can get far cheaper chips but they have far slower read/write times.

    Ether way with the chips put on the motherboard, that's it, no upgrading or replacing them.
    So if your onboard SSD is too small or too slow, tough, you have to get a whole new motherboard or a separate SSD

  3. #19
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,012
    Thanks
    782
    Thanked
    1,571 times in 1,327 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: SSD on the Mainboard ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pob255 View Post
    Ether way with the chips put on the motherboard, that's it, no upgrading or replacing them.
    So if your onboard SSD is too small or too slow, tough, you have to get a whole new motherboard or a separate SSD
    Sounds like the argument used against putting IDE ports, floppy controllers, serial ports etc onto the motherboard nearly 20 years ago.

    Cheap stuff gets integrated. If, like integrated video, it isn't up to scratch then just turn the feature off or ignore it and plug in something that works.

    If I had an integrated small SSD I would probably put Linux on it for kicks, then forget it was there

  4. #20
    Senior Member Pob255's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The land of Brum
    Posts
    10,143
    Thanks
    608
    Thanked
    1,226 times in 1,123 posts
    • Pob255's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M5A99X EVO
      • CPU:
      • FX8350 & CM Hyper 212+
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 2gb Corsair Vengence 1600mhz cas9
      • Storage:
      • 512gb samsung SSD +1tb Samsung HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EGVA GTX970
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic GX 650W
      • Case:
      • HAF 912+
      • Operating System:
      • W7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • iiyama XB3270QS-B1 32" IPS 1440p

    Re: SSD on the Mainboard ?

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    Sounds like the argument used against putting IDE ports, floppy controllers, serial ports etc onto the motherboard nearly 20 years ago.

    Cheap stuff gets integrated. If, like integrated video, it isn't up to scratch then just turn the feature off or ignore it and plug in something that works.

    If I had an integrated small SSD I would probably put Linux on it for kicks, then forget it was there
    No a sound card would be a closer comparason

    Most motherboards have the relatively low cost realtech sound onboard, to buy one as a seperate sound card cost under £10
    If you want higher quality sound then you have to pay a lot more for a top end motherboard which has better onboard sound or for a highend sound card.

    You don't get high end sound cards built into low cost motherboards and that's my point about a built in ssd.

    Low end SSD's are not faster and often can be slower than a hard drive, so if a low cost ssd is built into a motherboard it's not going to offer anything much in the way of a performance boost.
    The main cost of an SSD is in the flash memory chips as is the read/write performance, simply moving the control access side into the chipset is not going to vastly reduce the cost.
    The only wat to keep the costs down is cheaper lower capasity chips.
    Yes the chip cost will come down as they get better and higher volumes are made, but that would also bring down SSD costs.

    Would it be nice to have an onboard SSD? of course it would.
    Will it vastly improve your performance for less than $20 additional cost? Considering how low the grade of chips they'd have to use to keep it under $20 . . .

  5. #21
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,012
    Thanks
    782
    Thanked
    1,571 times in 1,327 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: SSD on the Mainboard ?

    Integrated sound is an interesting analogy, that is what I use atm

    Having been through the hassle & expense of lots of sound cards, I am fed up with buying them so I stick with what comes on the motherboard.

    Perhaps the Asus Express-gate could be considered the start of onboard SSD. That uses the BIOS flash chip, which has to be present anyway, so there is no extra board/interface/layout etc expense just the expense of using the next size up in flash chip. Maybe that will be the way it goes, you get a partition of the BIOS chip unlocked for general storage.

    Not leading edge performance, but it would be nice to have, for example, the Windows install media built into the motherboard for those times when a relative asks you to repair their PC and can only shrug when you ask where all the install/driver CDs have gone

  6. #22
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,039
    Thanks
    1,881
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: SSD on the Mainboard ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pob255 View Post
    Would it be nice to have an onboard SSD? of course it would.
    Will it vastly improve your performance for less than $20 additional cost? Considering how low the grade of chips they'd have to use to keep it under $20 . . .
    Also consider you're only talking about 8-16gb or so.. certainly room to have intel spec SSD in there given it's so small.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 24-08-2009, 05:35 AM
  2. 60GB OCZ Summit SSD - is it worth it?
    By Pazza in forum Storage
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 16-06-2009, 04:40 PM
  3. My 1st 3XS System - Raptor or SSD?
    By ITB1981 in forum SCAN 3XS Systems Support
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 14-04-2009, 03:12 PM
  4. Case Chassis for EE-ATX ("enhanced extended") Mainboard server builds
    By 64, Bitter in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-02-2009, 07:24 PM
  5. Complete NOOB needs mainboard help.
    By Andy3536 in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 27-05-2007, 11:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •