When it comes down to it, they both leave the payer (who pays in advance) equally exposed right? Is there any reason why a recipient would prefer receiving a cheque?
I am buying a second hand projector off someone on AVForum. The seller (and I) have no feedback on that site, but nothing flags out as suspicious. We are now at the stage where we are to decide how I should part with my money, and the seller (who seems unfamiliar with the concept of bank transfers - the only thing I find slightly peculiar) said that he called his bank and they advised him that I should send a crossed cheque or bank draft. The seller then mentioned that he could then pay in on a fast clearance and that would take one working day. The projector would then be dispatched to me.
As far as I am concerned it doesn't make a big difference. This is a relatively high risk transaction for me either way. It means that I'll have to find an envelop, buy a stamp and send it off. I suppose that the fact that he has receive the cheque mean that I can confirm where his postal address. From a speed perspective though, I reckon that a bank transfer is going to be quicker, and I do question the overnight 'fast clearance' system mentioned. So does anyone know why a person would prefer a cheque, or a bank would suggest that they go for a cheque over a bank transfer (I am ruling out a banker's draft simply because they charge an arm for it)?