I'm frankly puzzled by this thread. Fifty pence a month is so insignificant I really don't know where to start. Yes, yes, another tax in principle but relative to other taxes and even cost of living price hikes (namely utilities and council tax) this is really irrelevant.
No tax increase is irrelevant, even 1pence a month
Have I read this correctly that the money will go to companies like Sky and Virgin? Are they not paid to provide a service...
The companies should not be offering products they can't provide.
The 'up to' should be banned and they should work on a stable fast network rather than trying to make sure Scotland's most Northerly house has a 2meg download line.
Not by the people who they would have to provide a service to, no.
They're not - that's exactly the problem.The companies should not be offering products they can't provide.
Ensuring that the richer people have the best, fastest service while others go without any service at all is certainly one viewpoint. Another is that everyone should have access to broadband speeds, even if it's not gigabit at the moment. The govt. has chosen the latter, but I'm sure you could write to your MP demanding the former.The 'up to' should be banned and they should work on a stable fast network rather than trying to make sure Scotland's most Northerly house has a 2meg download line.
I don't understand how you can say richer people have faster broadband and others go without any service. Its not about how rich you are, and often rich people do live in the country in the middle of nowhere, the poor people and wage slaves all tend to be in the inner cities.
To my mind this is a cost/benefit analysis and the simple fact of the matter is if your broadband sucks because of your location then you can always bloody move. I don't agree with this tax and I don't really think its a socialist policy at all, internet access is a luxury really more than a necessity. Besides which dial up modems are slow but perfectly usable alternatives for doing stuff like online banking or whatever. I don't even understand why this govt would implement it because they are pissing off a majority by imposing a levy so they can provide for a minority and they can hardly afford that kind of policy right now.
HEXUS FOLDING TEAM It's EASY
It's £6 a year, that's barely 2 pints of beer (in London anyway). That's less then what I normally leave as a tip when I go out for a meal. Perspective people! You can barely get a pack of cigarettes for that and remember, that's PER YEAR! Guessing no one here donates to charities either?
Seems a bit odd to me.
Considering you can get broadband for around £7 per month, surely anyone who truley wants it, can afford it.
If you cannot afford that, how are you going to afford the PC that will utilise the connection?
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
I agree it's a bit odd with the PC thing, but if you think about it you can get PCs pretty much for free if you go with an out of date one, and there are many charities that do provide free PCs. I also presume these are people without even decent fixed phone lines - or they'll be taxing themselves which is a bit counter productive.
my other point here
i think people who live in the country dont really need fast internet, think about it. why is the internet fastest in london or other towns?
Because it is needed there, people who live there use it to its full...where as people in the far out country would tend to be oldish people in farms, do they need fast2meg line? i dont think so. like its been said 56K + 5yr old computer is perfectly fine for what they would be using it for,
Yes, excellent. We in the countryside don't need broadband, we're all far too busy chasing sheep and discussing the price of butter to care.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)