Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 17 to 32 of 34

Thread: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

  1. #17
    I'm Very Important
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,965
    Thanks
    323
    Thanked
    367 times in 323 posts
    • Domestic_Ginger's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II X2 550
      • Memory:
      • 4GB DDR2
      • Storage:
      • F3 500gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 5850
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 550vx
      • Case:
      • NZXT beta evo
      • Operating System:
      • W7
      • Monitor(s):
      • G2222HDL

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    They are a hoax apparently. SAbrePC is meant to be a bit shady and very new.
    Funny reviews though.

  2. Received thanks from:

    DanceswithUnix (22-02-2010)

  3. #18
    Senior Member cptwhite_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    4,458
    Thanks
    516
    Thanked
    689 times in 477 posts
    • cptwhite_uk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS TUF B650 Plus Wifi
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 7800X3D
      • Memory:
      • 32Gb DRR5 6400 C32 Team Group T-Create
      • Storage:
      • 4Tb Crucial P3 Plus
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RTX 4080 20Gb Gigabyte Gaming OC
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 850W 80+ Gold
      • Case:
      • Fractal North Charcoal / Walnut
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Gigabyte M28U (4K 144Hz)
      • Internet:
      • BT 500 Mbps

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    TBH it makes perfect sense that the performance is lacklusture. Given the delayed timescale of Fermi, I suspect they've been trying to give it some headroom above the 5870 so it at least has an excuse for being late. To be honest it's going to be a power hogging, brute force method, high cost underperformer given the current signals, IMO of course.

    Bad news for us, as it means the 5870 and 5850 prices are likely to hold. Poor show

  4. #19
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,010
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,568 times in 1,325 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Quote Originally Posted by Domestic_Ginger View Post
    They are a hoax apparently. SAbrePC is meant to be a bit shady and very new.
    Funny reviews though.
    Those reviews are excellent!

    Example below:


    Pros: Packaging was pretty nice. Came with a free copy of Metro 2033 and Bioshock 2.

    Cons: I came home 2 days after installing into my computer, and found my wife packing her bags, saying she was moving out and taking the GTX480 with her. She said it pleases her in more ways than I would ever know. She packed her bags and took the kids.

    Other Thoughts: The house is empty.

  5. #20
    WEEEEEEEEEEEEE! MadduckUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lytham St. Annes
    Posts
    17,297
    Thanks
    653
    Thanked
    1,579 times in 1,005 posts
    • MadduckUK's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200 DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 1x480GB SSD, 1x 2TB Hybrid, 1x 3TB Rust Spinner
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon 5700XT
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX750w
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Evolv mATX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SJ55W, DELL S2409W
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 80

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    Those reviews are excellent!

    Example below:


    Pros: Packaging was pretty nice. Came with a free copy of Metro 2033 and Bioshock 2.

    Cons: I came home 2 days after installing into my computer, and found my wife packing her bags, saying she was moving out and taking the GTX480 with her. She said it pleases her in more ways than I would ever know. She packed her bags and took the kids.

    Other Thoughts: The house is empty.
    they seem to be deleting the reviews type faster ppl!
    Quote Originally Posted by Ephesians
    Do not be drunk with wine, which will ruin you, but be filled with the Spirit
    Vodka

  6. #21
    Pork & Beans Powerup Phage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    6,260
    Thanks
    1,618
    Thanked
    608 times in 518 posts
    • Phage's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Crosshair VIII
      • CPU:
      • 3800x
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb @ 3600Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 960 512Gb + 2Tb Samsung 860
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 1080ti
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 850w
      • Case:
      • Fractal Define 7
      • Operating System:
      • W10 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Iiyama GB3461WQSU-B1

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Gave up waiting for Fermi. Ordered the 5870.
    Society's to blame,
    Or possibly Atari.

  7. #22
    WEEEEEEEEEEEEE! MadduckUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lytham St. Annes
    Posts
    17,297
    Thanks
    653
    Thanked
    1,579 times in 1,005 posts
    • MadduckUK's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200 DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 1x480GB SSD, 1x 2TB Hybrid, 1x 3TB Rust Spinner
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon 5700XT
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX750w
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Evolv mATX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SJ55W, DELL S2409W
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 80

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Quote Originally Posted by Phage View Post
    Gave up waiting for Fermi. Ordered the 5870.
    one of the Amazon ones?
    Quote Originally Posted by Ephesians
    Do not be drunk with wine, which will ruin you, but be filled with the Spirit
    Vodka

  8. #23
    Pork & Beans Powerup Phage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    6,260
    Thanks
    1,618
    Thanked
    608 times in 518 posts
    • Phage's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Crosshair VIII
      • CPU:
      • 3800x
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb @ 3600Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 960 512Gb + 2Tb Samsung 860
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 1080ti
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 850w
      • Case:
      • Fractal Define 7
      • Operating System:
      • W10 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Iiyama GB3461WQSU-B1

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Missed those by a couple of days.
    Ordered the slightly OC XFX from Scan.
    Society's to blame,
    Or possibly Atari.

  9. #24
    I'm Very Important
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,965
    Thanks
    323
    Thanked
    367 times in 323 posts
    • Domestic_Ginger's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-MA770-UD3
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II X2 550
      • Memory:
      • 4GB DDR2
      • Storage:
      • F3 500gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 5850
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 550vx
      • Case:
      • NZXT beta evo
      • Operating System:
      • W7
      • Monitor(s):
      • G2222HDL

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Article on GURU3D. Partners have been sent a 470 apparently. CBA to find the linky again.

    They mention something about mid to low end parts being lower binned parts.

    Okay I found it. Full of conjecture though. And a little swipe at SA too.

  10. #25
    WEEEEEEEEEEEEE! MadduckUK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Lytham St. Annes
    Posts
    17,297
    Thanks
    653
    Thanked
    1,579 times in 1,005 posts
    • MadduckUK's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200 DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 1x480GB SSD, 1x 2TB Hybrid, 1x 3TB Rust Spinner
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon 5700XT
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX750w
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Evolv mATX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung SJ55W, DELL S2409W
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 80

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Quote Originally Posted by Domestic_Ginger View Post
    Article on GURU3D. Partners have been sent a 470 apparently. CBA to find the linky again.

    They mention something about mid to low end parts being lower binned parts.

    Okay I found it. Full of conjecture though. And a little swipe at SA too.
    now i have only been able to skip through it because im busy, but he is agreeing with charlie yet making it sound like he is spreading doom and gloom?

    edit: in a paragraph - below par product creates "a rather negative stigma for NVIDIA", Guru3D feel inclined to write an article they don't write and cannot fault any of Charlies sources in the process of writing said article that they don't write.
    Last edited by MadduckUK; 22-02-2010 at 04:27 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ephesians
    Do not be drunk with wine, which will ruin you, but be filled with the Spirit
    Vodka

  11. #26
    Butter king GheeTsar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The shire of berks
    Posts
    2,106
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked
    260 times in 163 posts
    • GheeTsar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 2500k
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 8GB
      • Storage:
      • Samsung EVO 850 1 TB + 2 x 1TB Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS Radeon R9 280X
      • PSU:
      • Tagan TG600-U33 600W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define R3
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer 24" 120Hz GD245HQ
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 100mb

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Quote Originally Posted by Domestic_Ginger View Post
    Article on GURU3D. Partners have been sent a 470 apparently. CBA to find the linky again.

    They mention something about mid to low end parts being lower binned parts.

    Okay I found it. Full of conjecture though. And a little swipe at SA too.
    Thanks for the link. A pretty poor article IMHO; poor english, rubbishing SA without any supporting evidence or qualification and a few mixed messages.

  12. #27
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,232
    Thanked
    2,290 times in 1,873 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Quote Originally Posted by GheeTsar View Post
    ... rubbishing SA without any supporting evidence or qualification ...
    It doesn't even do that. It basically has a pop in the first paragraph, then goes on to tell exactly the same story as the SemiAccurate article - nvidia are late, running on revision A3 of the chip, and are clocking the samples lower than expected. It just says all that, then says they don't think it'll really matter. It's a very long way from journalism,and frankly it barely touches opinionated. It's pretty much filler: it's like someone's suddenly thought "everyone else is writing an article about Fermi, so we better get something out too"...

    The only new thing in there is that quote from Jen-Hsun Huang claiming that nvidia will get it's act together some time between May and August this year and will have Fermi-derived products at all price points. But if SA is to be believed those derived products a) aren't even in initial manufacture yet, so I doubt they'd hit mass market within 6 months, and b) will likely be troubled by the same transistor problems as the top-end chips, which will make them slow and low yield (i.e. expensive).

  13. #28
    Anthropomorphic Personification shaithis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Last Aerie
    Posts
    10,857
    Thanks
    645
    Thanked
    872 times in 736 posts
    • shaithis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77 WS
      • CPU:
      • i7 3770k @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB HyperX 1866
      • Storage:
      • Lots!
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Fury X
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T (White)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell 3007
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb Fibre

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    TBH, I am doubting nVidia will have anything worth purchasing until some time next year. They need to go back to the drawing board....
    Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
    HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
    HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
    Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
    NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
    Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive

  14. #29
    Senior Member Hicks12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Plymouth-SouthWest
    Posts
    6,586
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked
    336 times in 290 posts
    • Hicks12's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z68-V
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 2500k@4ghz, cooled by EK Supreme HF
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Kingston hyperX ddr3 PC3-12800 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 64GB M4/128GB M4 / WD 640GB AAKS / 1TB Samsung F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Palit GTX460 @ 900Mhz Core
      • PSU:
      • 675W ThermalTake ThoughPower XT
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A70 with modded top for 360mm rad
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H IPS
      • Internet:
      • 10mb/s cable from virgin media

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Isnt that what got them in this mess in the first place?

    Going to the drawing board and starting from scratch brought the development of fermi, its already seems like it wont deliver .
    Quote Originally Posted by snootyjim View Post
    Trust me, go into any local club and shout "I've got dual Nehalem Xeons" and all of the girls will practically collapse on the spot at the thought of your e-penis

  15. #30
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,010
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,568 times in 1,325 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    It doesn't even do that. It basically has a pop in the first paragraph, then goes on to tell exactly the same story as the SemiAccurate article - nvidia are late, running on revision A3 of the chip, and are clocking the samples lower than expected. It just says all that, then says they don't think it'll really matter. It's a very long way from journalism,and frankly it barely touches opinionated. It's pretty much filler: it's like someone's suddenly thought "everyone else is writing an article about Fermi, so we better get something out too"...

    The only new thing in there is that quote from Jen-Hsun Huang claiming that nvidia will get it's act together some time between May and August this year and will have Fermi-derived products at all price points. But if SA is to be believed those derived products a) aren't even in initial manufacture yet, so I doubt they'd hit mass market within 6 months, and b) will likely be troubled by the same transistor problems as the top-end chips, which will make them slow and low yield (i.e. expensive).
    ATI have told the world that TSMC have via and transistor problems, so they must be pretty sure Nvidia already know all that else they would have kept their mouth shut.

    It also sounds like the derived chips were waiting to learn from their big Fermi brother, so there is no need for them to be hot and riddled with duff vias.

    So if Jen Hsun says May to August, then September it is.

    They only have to show wood screws in May

  16. #31
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,010
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,568 times in 1,325 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Quote Originally Posted by MadduckUK View Post
    they seem to be deleting the reviews type faster ppl!
    The reviews are still there, though the interface sucks beyond belief. I clicked on the "see all reviews" button and set to 9 reviews per page. To see more reviews I manually change the page number in the box and hit submit.

    There seems to be a new one there that made me giggle:


    Pros: This card is so amazing I built a Time Machine and came back from 100 years in the future to tell you guys that we're still using it!

    Cons: And Still waiting for full DX-11 support.

    Other Thoughts:

  17. #32
    Butter king GheeTsar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The shire of berks
    Posts
    2,106
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked
    260 times in 163 posts
    • GheeTsar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3P
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 2500k
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 8GB
      • Storage:
      • Samsung EVO 850 1 TB + 2 x 1TB Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS Radeon R9 280X
      • PSU:
      • Tagan TG600-U33 600W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define R3
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer 24" 120Hz GD245HQ
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 100mb

    Re: SemiAccurate gets some GTX480 scores

    Launch date now confirmed : 26th March @ 6pm in Boston @ PAX 2010


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 46
    Last Post: 08-07-2008, 03:13 PM
  2. 3DMark06 Scores
    By TGA in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-05-2008, 10:07 PM
  3. Lower 3Dmark scores?
    By AD-15 in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 15-11-2007, 11:29 AM
  4. 3dmark scores.
    By Robert in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 18-04-2006, 12:05 AM
  5. erm ... 3dmark scores
    By Fatboy in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 20-02-2004, 03:23 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •