Yes - lol its not just for gaming
My hands arent suited to consoles unfortunatley ( i have very bad joints ) so i dont do well with button mashing on gamepads at all , unless they had an autofire button .
Its problem on pc games too so i usually try to avoid combat altogether and use magic , not sure of any way round that other than those rubbish autofire programs like with runescape that dont turn off , I even bought the G-15 ? LOGITECH keyboard but it barely worked with any games.
m
Much as it pains me (because it's an excellent game), be warned there is (mouse) button mashing in The Witcher 2. I don't like that they put it in, and there's at least an option to reduce the difficulty, but it's still there and unavoidable on a couple of occasions (though a macro for repeated mouse clicking should work).
I just want something that is
a ) going to last / be relevant for gaming and the basics / wear and tear of average pc use
b ) also for light scale media projects / 3d monitor if i get one
c ) upgradable
d ) dependable
e ) looks resonably cute
f) isnt so noisy
g ) Has possible reslate value in 2 yrs
m
Ah .. it looked so nice too
but I cant mash crunch buttons like 20 yrs ago... connective tissue you see is just awol
I cant believe their still using the same system Diablo had...
The irong being i usually end up playing the one sort of game i am sick to death of the most .. 3rd person shooters
m
IIRC,some mice like the G9 allow you to multi-click.
Not sure what you mean , as in one click = 20 ?
looking now.
m
later : just looks like another device with macros an buttons.
why the hell dont they have autofire buttons , on the old joysticks you could swich it to autofire and just press the button when you wanted it , it was so simple and effective
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO8fKRE-InU
Now if i had this i might have chance with consoles.
Last edited by melon; 28-05-2011 at 09:13 PM.
jackpot !!
http://www.videogamecentral.com/prod...ing-Stick.html
though its says nothing about windows 7
m
I was being sarcastic, yes, but with the aim of being helpful.
The point I'm trying to make is that graphics cards all have video RAM on them - maybe 256MB, maybe 512MB, maybe 1GB. However, that's no indication of how good a card is. The example I posted is a really rubbish card that's absolutely no use for proper gaming, yet it has 1GB of RAM.
So, as I said, don't worry about the memory, worry about the GPU (graphics processing unit), the equivalent of a CPU/processor. The actual video processor on the card, or more simply the model of card, is much more important than the amount of memory.
Worry about whether to buy a 460/480/560/580 or a 4870/5850/5870/6870, don't worry about how much memory it has on it. If you buy a decent card, it will come with enough memory supplied.
That's the long form of what my original post was meant to be saying
Sort of. I mean, don't get me wrong, a GTX 580 with 256MB of video RAM would be pretty rubbish, but obviously they don't make it - they give all of the cards enough memory to do the job. Sometimes having more memory can be useful, but it's always going to be far less important than the chip.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)