Read more.12% of us can't translate 3D images properly, apparently.
Read more.12% of us can't translate 3D images properly, apparently.
Isn't one in ten of us, 10% or it should be one in twelve.more than one in ten of us (12%)
I had suspected that I'd have problems seeing some films in 3d - but I recently saw Shrek 4 without any issues ... although I did have to wear both my own glasses as well as the funky 3d ones.
I can't use them, due to a problem with my left eye. Can't say I'm too bothered. I've used it in the past, always fell distinctly in the 'gimmck' category for me, rather than "wow, wish I could watch everything like this".
Gimmick is the correct word! Having only just got a HDTV I'm not spending out on a new one for several years no matter how keen Sony are for me to do so.
Also I keep thinking that the majority of 3d games will just be 3d film tie ins - just the sort of thing I want to avoid!
Well I'm firmly in that 12% then seeing that 50% of my eyes are plastic.
Nothing wrong with good old 2D. Fact.
3D works for me however it does cause eye strain after a film so I don't think an evening gaming in 3D is a good idea. I would also watch most normal programs in 2D as well, has see the point of watching News24 in 3D!
(\__/) All I wanted in the end was world domination and a whole lot of money to spend. - NMA
(='.*=)
(")_(*)
I could imagine it being pretty interesting in very short burts on a vertical shooter something akin to Ikaruga but for anything longer than 10 minutes I think it would play havoc on my eyes. I don't really see it working terribly well for other types of games. As cheesemp said, it'll more than likely be mostly move tie-ins we see.
jim (13-07-2010)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)