Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 38

Thread: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    29,414
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,924 times in 668 posts

    Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    How would you sort out the patent mess?
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Anthropomorphic Personification shaithis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Last Aerie
    Posts
    10,857
    Thanks
    645
    Thanked
    872 times in 736 posts
    • shaithis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77 WS
      • CPU:
      • i7 3770k @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB HyperX 1866
      • Storage:
      • Lots!
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Fury X
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T (White)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell 3007
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb Fibre

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    Easy. Invalidate every wishy-washy patent. I.e. rounded corners, clear desktop, colours, style and anything that keeps devices standardised (i.e. finger zooming and other gestures)
    Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
    HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
    HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
    Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
    NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
    Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive

  3. #3
    Now 100% Apple free cheesemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Near the New forest
    Posts
    2,358
    Thanks
    167
    Thanked
    154 times in 108 posts
    • cheesemp's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z77-D3H
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570k @ 4.2
      • Memory:
      • 16gb Crucial Ballastix Elite DDR3 @1866
      • Storage:
      • 64Gb M4 + 240Gb arc100 + 2x500Gb HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX 480 8Gb Nitro+ OC
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650W Semi modular
      • Case:
      • NZXT Source S340 Mid Tower
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 32" QHD AOC Q3279VWF
      • Internet:
      • FTTC ~30Mb

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    Quote Originally Posted by shaithis View Post
    Easy. Invalidate every wishy-washy patent. I.e. rounded corners, clear desktop, colours, style and anything that keeps devices standardised (i.e. finger zooming and other gestures)
    This. A patient should be something really unique - something like 'bouncing' isn't unique - designing a new never thought of device is. Copyright should be enough for designs/icons.
    Trust

    Laptop : Lenovo G505s A8-5550m 8Gb 240Gb SSD Radeon HD 8550G + Radeon HD 8570M dual graphics

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    Hold both companies in contempt of court for nothing more than a territorial pi$$ing contest tell Apple it can't copyright a rectangle and to grow up. fine them both and give the money to some nice charity for people who own Windows based phones
    then point out the obvious there is bound to be some likeness due to them being used by the same species and being anatomically designed for ease of use

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    If it exists in the physical world, it cannot be patented in the digital world. This applies to devices (slide to unlock on a phone, versus the slide to unlock in the stall at a public restroom) and techniques (pinch to zoom, akin to stretching something to make it larger in real life.)

    Look and feel of anything should not be patentable.. if rounded corners on a shape are patentable, then the round shape should be patentable, thus making circles, patentable, thus making any shape patentable... thus making the way anything looks an infringement on an already existing patent... This is rubbish and should not be tolerated.

  6. #6
    Bows out! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Hopefully somewhere less backstabby
    Posts
    28,789
    Thanks
    3,203
    Thanked
    4,456 times in 3,442 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    They should all be slapped with a wet fish.


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  7. Received thanks from:

    Dareos (01-09-2012)

  8. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Triggagnomic's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z77-UD3H
      • CPU:
      • i5 3750K @4.5Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8 GB of Sammy Green @2000Mhz -10-10-10-28
      • Storage:
      • Plextor M3 128GB & WD Caviar Blue 500Gb w/64GB kingston 100 as cache
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 480 SLI
      • PSU:
      • XFX 850W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster HAF 912+
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 HP X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • iiyama Prolite E2208HDD

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    How about throwing them both out of court and letting the market decide?

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    29 times in 24 posts

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    I wish Apple had won with a slightly lower award (say $600 million), and that Samsung's claims had also been upheld (granted to a lesser amount, say $150 million). Then, both sides could threaten to ban each other's devices and hopefully, either common sense woudl prevail (and they would sort out some kind of cross-licensing agreement) or common sense might finally have prevailed in the US legal/political circles when they would be faced with the prospect of banning all affected iPhones AND all the relevant Samsung phones. See what they think that would achieve for consumer choice.

    Also - I think the rounded corners patent is extremely stupid, and not in any way new. I also think the Samsung FRAND patents are a stupid thing to use in court unless someoen is refusing to pay the same terms as are offered to everyone else.

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    343
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked
    9 times in 7 posts

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    Well it's hard to wade through the mounds of detail in the case but it does feel like US protectionism, Japan has just ruled in favour of Samsung in a similar case, South Korea's courts chastised both companies for being petty.

    I'd be more inclined to side with Apple if they had actually invented anything, I can't think of a single product Apple came up with themselves. No doubt they produce and market products very successfully, it's just not innovation, they have invented and invigorated markets to a collosal scale which is impressive.

    MS bailed Apple out years back, I think they should be more humble and respect the others in the tech world, I'm getting fed up of the extreme aggression from all sides.

  11. #10
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    94
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    7 times in 7 posts
    • fail_quail's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 7 1700
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200mhz
      • Storage:
      • 512GB NVME SSD x2, 320GB SATA SSHD, 4TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD RX580 8GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • corsair carbide 88r
      • Operating System:
      • Win10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Dell WFP 2408 + cheap 22" LG monitor
      • Internet:
      • 100meg Virgin cable

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    'what would you do to resolve this ever-escalating patent mess?'
    Scrap the entire software patent system wholesale.

    Then start a discussion on whether there should even be a replacement (IMHO, no)

  12. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Kingdom of Fife (Scotland)
    Posts
    4,991
    Thanks
    393
    Thanked
    220 times in 190 posts
    • crossy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabertooth X99
      • CPU:
      • Intel 5830k / Noctua NH-D15
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 850Pro NVMe, 1TB Samsung 850EVO SSD, 1TB Seagate SSHD, 2TB WD Green, 8TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix GTX970OC
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750 (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster HAF932 (with wheels)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit, Ubuntu 16.04LTS
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG Flattron W2361V
      • Internet:
      • VirginMedia 200Mb

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    Quote Originally Posted by Tpyo View Post
    I wish Apple had won with a slightly lower award (say $600 million), and that Samsung's claims had also been upheld (granted to a lesser amount, say $150 million). . I also think the Samsung FRAND patents are a stupid thing to use in court unless someoen is refusing to pay the same terms as are offered to everyone else.
    First off I was of the opinion that Apple was being petty, now I'm not so sure and maybe they do deserve a small payment - that said I would have thought anything more than about US$10 per device was just plain extortion. And from what little I've heard on the Samsung case Apple's definition of "FRAND" is kind of odd - they seem to think that they deserve better terms than everyone else. As***les!
    Quote Originally Posted by brasco View Post
    Well it's hard to wade through the mounds of detail in the case but it does feel like US protectionism
    This^ and what's really worrying me is that Samsung will be speaking to their government for a bit of protection of their own. And I can't see any good coming of that!
    Our QOTW, therefore, is 'what would you do to resolve this ever-escalating patent mess?' Imaginative, creative and acerbic answers are all welcome.
    Nuke the USPTO - seriously, these bozo's seem to be at the heart of the majority of patent trollery - in fact, that a patent troll "industry" even exists should be a sure sign to anyone with common sense that the US trademark/patent system is fundamentally broken. That done, make "being a patent lawyer" a criminal activity, subject to prosection!

    Okay, joking aside, I'd like the ITO to step in - there's US patents involved here that don't seem to be held as valid anywhere else. In that case, it'd surely be an improvement if - for example Samsung - could go to the ITO, get a ruling and force the USPTO to drop the offending patent as "invalid". Likewise, if Samsung were offering worse FRAND terms to Apple, then Apple and Samsung could be compelled to sit with the ITO as an arbiter (like a sort of global ACAS) with again the ITO offering a binding, final verdict. My naive hope is that since the ITO is a global body then we'd see less of this moronic "home advantage" wrt protectionist use of the legal system.

    Career status: still enjoying my new career in DevOps, but it's keeping me busy...

  13. #12
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    I just think that the whole patent system is flawed and it is clear that something needs to be done about it.

  14. #13
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    88
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    To quote the great JC (jeremy clarkson): "I'd have them all shot. I'd take them outside and execute them in front of their families" ;^)

  15. #14
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    When I was young I used to have a small little chalk board to draw on... I think Apple owes me millions for copying my early version of their now popular ipad!!!!

  16. #15
    HEXUS.social member Agent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    19,159
    Thanks
    733
    Thanked
    1,605 times in 1,044 posts

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    I'd simply ban software patents. End of.

    Imagine if we were having these patent wars 20 years ago: Web servers, mail servers, GUI's and even a mouse cursor could be the case of the day.

    We will look back on these current cases in 20 years and laugh at their stupidity. That or it will have held us back so much that we'll be crying.
    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    And by trying to force me to like small pants, they've alienated me.

  17. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    519
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    16 times in 14 posts
    • McPhee's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8H67 Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 2400
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Crucial DDR3-1033
      • Storage:
      • 128GB Kingston SSDNow V2+
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX460
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 550W
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 19" Samsung 941BW
      • Internet:
      • 1Mbps

    Re: Features - QOTW: Apple vs. Samsung - you be the judge

    To qualify for a patent, and invention must be novel, useful and non-obvious. Apple's patented UI elements certainly cover the first two. The third is very debatable. Looking at it through a 2012 lens, they are certainly obvious designs. However, we have to question whether or not this is due to the wide adoption of these paradigms within the industry. Today, a smartphone would feel wrong without them. The real question is, were these ideas non-obvious in 2004, 2005, 2006 while the iPhone was being developed? Were they the product of a lot of research conducted by Apple to find ways of interaction that feel natural? Or were they the obvious and only logical ways of interaction? I'm leaning towards the former - if the ideas were so obvious, why hadn't anybody beaten Apple to the punch? They didn't appear in their current guise in any smartphone or fan concept that I can find, prior to the release of the iPhone in 2007.

    Since 2007, these UI patents have become so widely used that they are now basically an industry standard. People are used to using these gestures to interact with their devices. It would seem wrong to take that away from consumers. At the same time, the only reason why these ideas are now industry standard is because certain companies chose to ignore the protection granted by a patent and use the technology anyway. The legal system shouldn't support this stance - the idea that you can steal patented designs or technologies, reap the benefits and then deal with the aftermath further down the road should not be encouraged. It supports the destructive idea that patents need not apply if your pocket book is big enough. The offending companies need a thoroughly good slap.

    Currently, Apple licenses these patents to certain companies (Including Microsoft. Possibly Palm/HP, Nokia and others), sues others and lets some escape litigation entirely. This isn't a fair stance. These UI paradigms have become industry-standard and are the expected methods of interaction. As such, they should be available to all. Apple should be required to license these patents under FRAND. That way, anybody can use them providing a fair and reasonable license fee is paid. This license fee would go some way towards acknowledging the contribution that Apple has made towards modern smartphones and reinforces the positive message that thinking differently pays off.

    The patent for the iPhone's shape was ridiculous. If every manufacturer patented each product's shape then pretty quickly we'd be in a market with no room for manoeuvre. A Motorola would look like a Motorola because that would be the only shape(s) they'd legally be allowed to use. Was the shape of the original iPhone iconic? Yes. Did the patent offer some protection against other companies copying it? Looking at the Galaxy S, 'some' would be the right word. Would the market have become saturated with iPhone clones without the patent? Probably, but they'd soon get bored and... copy the next iPhone's shape (I jest - eventually someone would realise that all they need to do to stand out is make something that doesn't look like an iPhone).

    On Samsung's patents... well... I'm no expert and the argument is complicated. From my limited understanding, it does seem a lot like a 'what have we got to countersue with?' moment, rather than a genuine complaint.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •