Efficiency of power stations.
The average thermal efficiency of UK coal fired stations is about 37%; interpolating from that data I would hazard a guess that it's possible to make a coal fired station close to 40% efficient given the (in general) somewhat aged nature of our coal fired plants
. Coal is not a particularly easy 'form factor' to work with, and as you can see our gas fired plants are over 45% efficient. I see no reason why a plant burning petrol or diesel could not also approach this efficiency.
So, large scale plants are quite a bit more efficient than internal combustion engines; the question is whether the losses inherent in transmitting electricity, storing it in batteries, and then transforming it into motive power nullify this advantage- I suspect that they do, but I don't have stats to quantify it.
Personally, I think that running vehicles on rapeseed oil is our best oprion in the short to medium term, especially given the ridiculous system of EU farm subsidies that keeps much of our potentially productive land "fallow". Of course, the government doesn't see it that way, so they've recently increased the duty payable on SVO to the same as that payable on petro-diesel, totally taking away any advantage of using it. Only 'biodiesel' now attracts the reduced rate- and biodiesel has to go through a bunch of not particularly environmentally friendly esterification processes to make it functionally equivalent to normal diesel. It's typical government b*llocks- pay lip service to our Kyoto obligations while in practice legislating against genuinely enviromentally beneficial systems
.
Edit: this post took three hours to compose, dinner/booze/fags got in the way, split it off if you like Stoo.