Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 17 to 32 of 37

Thread: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

  1. #17
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • flipzero's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte G33-DS3R rev 1.1
      • CPU:
      • Intel E2140 @ 3.0Ghz (8x375, stock volts), Arctic Freezer 7 Pro
      • Memory:
      • 2x 1GB Crucial Ballistix 6400 DDR2-800
      • Storage:
      • WD Raptor WD1500ADFD 150GB, Seagate 7200.7 200GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Onboard (until I can afford a decent DX10 card!)
      • PSU:
      • Thermaltake W0093 TR2-500W
      • Case:
      • Antec P180b
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG L204WT 20"
      • Internet:
      • Sky Max (getting ~3.7Mb/s connection)

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    Quote Originally Posted by usxhe190 View Post
    So to clarify, if I think something I brought from you is faulty and I send it back to you guys and you say it is not faulty after testing, you charge me £30?

    Is that correct?
    No, it's £30 + VAT!

  2. Received thanks from:

    usxhe190 (08-11-2007)

  3. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    56 times in 53 posts

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    plus VAT but only if they collect it and return it.

    if u sent it by ur own courier/post probably they would charge £20+VAT (10 fee and 10 to return?) if its NFF.

  4. Received thanks from:

    usxhe190 (08-11-2007)

  5. #19
    Senior Member usxhe190's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,688
    Thanks
    149
    Thanked
    82 times in 63 posts

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    thanks rabbid and flipzero.

  6. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    56 times in 53 posts

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    Yes its why if I cant fix something, I make very sure the fault is replicatable else it can end up costing more than binning the faulty part. Thats the downside of mail order (with any company).
    Unless its an error in supply on their part or an obvious DiT claim, you are pretty much responsible for getting the part back to them.

  7. #21
    Senior Member usxhe190's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,688
    Thanks
    149
    Thanked
    82 times in 63 posts

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    rabbid, does scan provide any backup to their statements? i.e. they give testing results?

  8. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    56 times in 53 posts

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    I don't know about testing results.
    Luckily(?!) I spend some of my time in a driveable distance to Bolton so if I have a warranty issue I go and sort it out at the returns counter. It can take up a chunk of time but at least it gets resolved, again I make sure faults are replicatable before I go to save wasting their and my time.

    edit:
    I remember a long time ago (before I ever came to NW area) I had a suspected faulty stick of RAM. Back in those days I had not heard of MEMTEST but after raising an OLQ returns advised me to dload and run memtest. I got a number of errors in certain memory ranges & duly informed them and they raised an RMA. It was replaced with no issue but I did pay carraige to them (by recorded 1st class post like 1.50 or so). Scan couriered a shiny new stick back to me at their expense.

    At a similar time to that I had a query about a then new out Abit NF7-M mobo. And they responded with a very long list of things to try! It seems my problem was the RAM above giving me grief and a little later on Abit released a BIOS update that cured the rest of my issues, so I wonder how that would have gone if I had jumped at sending it back? Patience can save you money with these things!
    Last edited by rabbid; 08-11-2007 at 02:19 PM.

  9. Received thanks from:

    usxhe190 (08-11-2007)

  10. #23
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • flipzero's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte G33-DS3R rev 1.1
      • CPU:
      • Intel E2140 @ 3.0Ghz (8x375, stock volts), Arctic Freezer 7 Pro
      • Memory:
      • 2x 1GB Crucial Ballistix 6400 DDR2-800
      • Storage:
      • WD Raptor WD1500ADFD 150GB, Seagate 7200.7 200GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Onboard (until I can afford a decent DX10 card!)
      • PSU:
      • Thermaltake W0093 TR2-500W
      • Case:
      • Antec P180b
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG L204WT 20"
      • Internet:
      • Sky Max (getting ~3.7Mb/s connection)

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    Quote Originally Posted by rabbid View Post
    if u sent it by ur own courier/post probably they would charge £20+VAT (10 fee and 10 to return?) if its NFF.
    LOL and that's exactly what I'd have done if I'd known about the charge! I even recall telling people what a good service Scan were providing, ah the naivety...

  11. #24
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • flipzero's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte G33-DS3R rev 1.1
      • CPU:
      • Intel E2140 @ 3.0Ghz (8x375, stock volts), Arctic Freezer 7 Pro
      • Memory:
      • 2x 1GB Crucial Ballistix 6400 DDR2-800
      • Storage:
      • WD Raptor WD1500ADFD 150GB, Seagate 7200.7 200GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Onboard (until I can afford a decent DX10 card!)
      • PSU:
      • Thermaltake W0093 TR2-500W
      • Case:
      • Antec P180b
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG L204WT 20"
      • Internet:
      • Sky Max (getting ~3.7Mb/s connection)

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    My issue was a motherboard and CPU failing to POST, without even any warning beeps (but fans running). Tried everything in the book before returning it, except that is for another PSU as I didn't have a spare at the time with the now requisite CPU power connector.

    Of course turns out upon it's return to me after testing ok that the fault IS with the CPU power lead on my 16-month old XClio Greatpower PSU (also from Scan), gutted.

  12. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    56 times in 53 posts

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    Do you mind telling us some more details of the item/proposed fault?
    Its hard to make a comment either way as we arent party to whats gone wrong initially.

    edit:
    ah read my mind

    Oh, you didnt have the auxilliary 4pin power connector?
    I dont think any current cpu will work without this nowadays
    Or do you mean the 20-24 pin main ATX?

    Pity you didnt come here first and post before RAMing it, we could probably have saved you some hassles and cash.

    So do you have a working setup now or waiting for newer PSU?
    Last edited by rabbid; 08-11-2007 at 02:56 PM.

  13. #26
    Grumpy Old Git
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Lancashire, UK
    Posts
    798
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked
    24 times in 17 posts
    • slinger's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z87-K
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 4670k Haswell under a Corsair H80i
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair DDR3 Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • Crucial M500 120gb SSD (OS), Crucial M500 250GB, 2TB Hitachi, 1TB Seagate SATA 3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB OC
      • PSU:
      • Corsair CX750M
      • Case:
      • Corsair Carbide 200r
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 27" LED
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 200mb

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    Quote Originally Posted by flipzero View Post
    LOL and that's exactly what I'd have done if I'd known about the charge! I even recall telling people what a good service Scan were providing, ah the naivety...
    Scan do provide a very good service, hence why they have been in business such a long time and why they have so many customers going back time and time again, myself included.
    Before you say it this isn't me "arse licking", its just a shame their business isn't idiot proof so they can prevent customers clicking "I agree" without putting their reading glasses on first. Do you do the same with EULA's and finance agreements? I'd hazzard a guess that you do
    Intel Core i5 4670k Haswell | Asus Z87-K | 16gb Corsair DDR3 Vengeance | Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB OC | Crucial M500 120gb SSD (OS), Crucial M500 250gb SSD, 2TB & 1TB Sata's | Corsair Carbide 200r | LG 27" LED | Corsair CX750M | Corsair h80i

  14. #27
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • flipzero's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte G33-DS3R rev 1.1
      • CPU:
      • Intel E2140 @ 3.0Ghz (8x375, stock volts), Arctic Freezer 7 Pro
      • Memory:
      • 2x 1GB Crucial Ballistix 6400 DDR2-800
      • Storage:
      • WD Raptor WD1500ADFD 150GB, Seagate 7200.7 200GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Onboard (until I can afford a decent DX10 card!)
      • PSU:
      • Thermaltake W0093 TR2-500W
      • Case:
      • Antec P180b
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG L204WT 20"
      • Internet:
      • Sky Max (getting ~3.7Mb/s connection)

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    Quote Originally Posted by slinger View Post
    Before you say it this isn't me "arse licking", its just a shame their business isn't idiot proof so they can prevent customers clicking "I agree" without putting their reading glasses on first. Do you do the same with EULA's and finance agreements? I'd hazzard a guess that you do
    Thanks for that input, I am obviously an idiot..

  15. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    56 times in 53 posts

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    Oh no, now they will make us scroll down all the T&C and pres F8 to continue setup, I mean checkout

  16. #29
    Senior Member usxhe190's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,688
    Thanks
    149
    Thanked
    82 times in 63 posts

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    i wonder who reads the Ts and Cs everytime they buy something? if everyone did, i am sure the sales for every company would drop

  17. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    56 times in 53 posts

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    BTW I edited my earlier post while u guys were chatting above, asking about which connector you didnt have or as faulty?

    It gets confusing as while I take so long to write a question the thread has moved on!

  18. #31
    Grumpy Old Git
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Lancashire, UK
    Posts
    798
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked
    24 times in 17 posts
    • slinger's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z87-K
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 4670k Haswell under a Corsair H80i
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair DDR3 Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • Crucial M500 120gb SSD (OS), Crucial M500 250GB, 2TB Hitachi, 1TB Seagate SATA 3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB OC
      • PSU:
      • Corsair CX750M
      • Case:
      • Corsair Carbide 200r
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 27" LED
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 200mb

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    Quote Originally Posted by usxhe190 View Post
    i wonder who reads the Ts and Cs everytime they buy something? if everyone did, i am sure the sales for every company would drop

    I would bet that 99.9% of people don't in all honesty (but I'm not including finance agreements in that) but my point was you can hardly complain after the event if you didnt read the t&c's.
    Thats why my post ended with a winking smiley rather than a roll your eyes in the sky one
    Intel Core i5 4670k Haswell | Asus Z87-K | 16gb Corsair DDR3 Vengeance | Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB OC | Crucial M500 120gb SSD (OS), Crucial M500 250gb SSD, 2TB & 1TB Sata's | Corsair Carbide 200r | LG 27" LED | Corsair CX750M | Corsair h80i

  19. #32
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • flipzero's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte G33-DS3R rev 1.1
      • CPU:
      • Intel E2140 @ 3.0Ghz (8x375, stock volts), Arctic Freezer 7 Pro
      • Memory:
      • 2x 1GB Crucial Ballistix 6400 DDR2-800
      • Storage:
      • WD Raptor WD1500ADFD 150GB, Seagate 7200.7 200GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Onboard (until I can afford a decent DX10 card!)
      • PSU:
      • Thermaltake W0093 TR2-500W
      • Case:
      • Antec P180b
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG L204WT 20"
      • Internet:
      • Sky Max (getting ~3.7Mb/s connection)

    Re: Very unhappy with Scan returns/testing policy

    Quote Originally Posted by slinger View Post
    you can hardly complain after the event if you didnt read the t&c's.
    My complaint was regarding the transparency of the charges, or lack of. Additionally the misleading statement in the e-mail stating one of the three applicable charges without referencing the others..

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Thanks SCAN and sorry for your loss
    By nope in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-02-2007, 02:26 PM
  2. Thumbs up for Scan
    By beachboy in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26-01-2007, 12:33 AM
  3. Scan strike again!
    By Speedo in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 25-08-2006, 05:31 PM
  4. Scan Order - Not Happy
    By t_aitch in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 30-11-2005, 06:40 PM
  5. My new PC from Scan - A full review
    By matt_hobson in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-04-2004, 02:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •