Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910 LastLast
Results 129 to 144 of 147

Thread: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

  1. #129
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,039
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Have to say I disagree. On modern computers modern OSen work fine with more than enough performance for the majority of modern tasks they are put to.

  2. #130
    Lovely chap dangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    8,398
    Thanks
    412
    Thanked
    459 times in 334 posts
    • dangel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • See My Sig
      • CPU:
      • See My Sig
      • Memory:
      • See My Sig
      • Storage:
      • See My Sig
      • Graphics card(s):
      • See My Sig
      • PSU:
      • See My Sig
      • Case:
      • See My Sig
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • See My Sig
      • Internet:
      • 60mbit Sky LLU

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    As much as I love my (several) Amigas - the only thing Windows doesn't do as well is handle CD/DVD insertion
    Crosshair VIII Hero (WIFI), 3900x, 32GB DDR4, Many SSDs, EVGA FTW3 3090, Ethoo 719


  3. #131
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,945
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    388 times in 315 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Looks like you both missed the point. Those are both over 10 year old OS's.
    What were other OS's doing 10 years ago? Windows 98.
    That was a piece of Macos 9?
    That was also
    In fact the last real Amiga and ST OS's were both written in 1992. The age of Windows 3.1
    I said in my previous post:
    OS's like STOS for the Atari ST (spit*) and Workbench for the Amiga were good desktop OS's (for the time)
    Things have moved on now, however that doesn't mean that any current easily available OS is actually that good at what it is sold to you to do.

    Before anyone starts pointing how these old OS's lacked things like multi user capability, file system security, process isolation etc, please re read my post.
    That is all irrelevant at that time due to hardware available and what people used to use their computers for.
    Just to clarify further: Workbench 3.1 is rubbish compared to Vista. or XP, or OSX. However they have had another 15 years to get better. In fact Windows 2000 was far better than Workbench 3.1
    NT4.0 was certainly not a better desktop OS, Nor Was Windows 98SE.
    Has Windows or any other OS booted from pressing the power button in under 6 seconds
    Thats what my Amiga used to do. Admittedly part of that is because it's version of BIOS was over and done with in less than a second, so lets say that leaves 5 seconds for loading.
    A modern HDD can sustain anything from 60-120 MB/sec. That's enough for 300-600MB of data. Forget access time. It's possible for a properly designed OS to load all 600 MB to memory in one continuous lump, then use the RAM for random access.
    Vista rearranges its boot files on the HDD every 3 days. It knows exactily what data was requested last boot and uses this to reorder the data. I have 8 GB RAM. Why can't it put all of the data needed to get me to the desktop in one contiguous block at the edge of my HDD? I have a quad core CPU.

    I predict a whole load of excuses as to why this is impossible for a modern operating system to do, but all it requires is a little thinking out of the box.
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  4. #132
    Comfortably Numb directhex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    /dev/urandom
    Posts
    17,074
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked
    1,026 times in 677 posts
    • directhex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus ROG Strix B550-I Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5900x
      • Memory:
      • 64GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Seagate Firecuda 520
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNOVA 850W G3
      • Case:
      • NZXT H210i
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 20.04, Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 34GN850
      • Internet:
      • FIOS

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    BeOS had boot times around 6 seconds on my old p2-400

  5. #133
    Seething Cauldron of Hatred TheAnimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    17,168
    Thanks
    803
    Thanked
    2,152 times in 1,408 posts

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by directhex View Post
    out of curiosity, how does mono on windows deal with your use-case? i've found major differences in the overall behaviour of threads between the platforms, but i suspect it's more OS-related than framework-related
    Its strange. I didn't have time to fully test (as sticking with windows is just cheaper for us, my farm is only 8 nodes)

    but.. http://www.go-mono.com/docs/index.as...ing.WaitHandle seamed to have great variancies in performance on win, but was consistant on the bsd build someone in infrastructure could lend me. Same hardware (desktop) but sometimes slow or fast on win, never as fast as the .Net framework version. Very odd as i'd of guessed it was all the same kernel object underneeth!
    throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)

  6. #134
    Lovely chap dangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    8,398
    Thanks
    412
    Thanked
    459 times in 334 posts
    • dangel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • See My Sig
      • CPU:
      • See My Sig
      • Memory:
      • See My Sig
      • Storage:
      • See My Sig
      • Graphics card(s):
      • See My Sig
      • PSU:
      • See My Sig
      • Case:
      • See My Sig
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • See My Sig
      • Internet:
      • 60mbit Sky LLU

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    I predict a whole load of excuses as to why this is impossible for a modern operating system to do, but all it requires is a little thinking out of the box.
    Well, two things came immediately to mind - first standby (default on Vista), and second hibernation. Then again, I don't really have an issues with boot time (thanks to superfetch) except on laptops which have ****-slow hd's. Of course, resume issues can occur thanks to duff drivers - and vista has facilities to help you locate the sluggish drivers on your system. Watch the hibernation loading bar - that's a fair indicator of how long it takes the kernel to page in the saved RAM image, the rest is just waiting for drivers/services to initialise.

    My last Amiga, the A4000 - with a 68060 and a Picasso took a lot longer to startup than six seconds (from hard drive). Depends what you consider the OS - kickstart was in ROM, workbench etc wasn't.
    Crosshair VIII Hero (WIFI), 3900x, 32GB DDR4, Many SSDs, EVGA FTW3 3090, Ethoo 719


  7. #135
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Let's ignore the boot process and assume we're resuming from hibernation.

    How many devices are there on the system? Not just peripherals, but devices... timers, DMAs, interfaces etc.

    Now the idea of hibernation is that you dump your whole memory onto disk, then load it back up and pretend like nothing every happened. Except it's a lot more complicated than that.

    Lots of these devices, that you've just woken up from 'cold' again, only expose certain parts of their registers and internal workings to the system through memory mapping. They may need some initialisation procedure to bring them back to the pre-hibernation state. You can't just write the registers back and hope for the best. So every driver needs to know what to do when the OS says "Oh hi, I'm coming out of hibernation, sort your device out plz".

    And that's just one example of what complicates and slows down coming out of hibernation.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  8. #136
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,945
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    388 times in 315 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by directhex View Post
    BeOS had boot times around 6 seconds on my old p2-400
    And there we have evidence that the hardware is not what's causing modern OS's to take forever.
    IIRC BeOS was a ground up new OS. I remember holding much hope for it before it flopped.
    Quote Originally Posted by dangel View Post
    Well, two things came immediately to mind - first standby (default on Vista), and second hibernation. Then again, I don't really have an issues with boot time (thanks to superfetch) except on laptops which have ****-slow hd's. Of course, resume issues can occur thanks to duff drivers - and vista has facilities to help you locate the sluggish drivers on your system. Watch the hibernation loading bar - that's a fair indicator of how long it takes the kernel to page in the saved RAM image, the rest is just waiting for drivers/services to initialise.

    My last Amiga, the A4000 - with a 68060 and a Picasso took a lot longer to startup than six seconds (from hard drive). Depends what you consider the OS - kickstart was in ROM, workbench etc wasn't.
    How long does your machine take to boot though? 40 seconds? Admittedly quick enough but it could be a lot quicker. For reference the machine that took 6 seconds to boot was an A1200 with a 170 MB HDD. I later put a 68060 board in it with 8MB - later upgraded to 32MB RAM and it did not affect boot times.
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve View Post
    Let's ignore the boot process and assume we're resuming from hibernation.

    How many devices are there on the system? Not just peripherals, but devices... timers, DMAs, interfaces etc.

    Now the idea of hibernation is that you dump your whole memory onto disk, then load it back up and pretend like nothing every happened. Except it's a lot more complicated than that.

    Lots of these devices, that you've just woken up from 'cold' again, only expose certain parts of their registers and internal workings to the system through memory mapping. They may need some initialisation procedure to bring them back to the pre-hibernation state. You can't just write the registers back and hope for the best. So every driver needs to know what to do when the OS says "Oh hi, I'm coming out of hibernation, sort your device out plz".

    And that's just one example of what complicates and slows down coming out of hibernation.
    On the whole hibernation front - to speed boot up times it is a bodge. From a keeping various apps open in the same state as you left them it is good.

    I suppose when I'm saying that all "modern" OS's aren't as good - reletively speaking - for home users compared to what they once were is down to a few things:
    1. They take excessively long to boot
    2. They are too resource hungry
    3. They over complicate things

    I'l add that thats obviously not all down to their makers. The companies that provide the hardware and drivers are just as responsible.
    It comes down to the lazy short termism that was introduced to the market by Microsoft and IBM all of those years ago.
    Did you know that until around 2002 - around 4 years after Windows update was rolled out, it was still completely stupid? If you didn't reboot the computer aftter each update was applied, you simply cound not guarentee they had installed properly. Then they finally worked out that before queuing a file to be changed on next reboot, the updates should check to see if another update had also queued the change and was in fact going to install a newer version of the file already.
    Lazy and dumb. For 4 years.
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  9. #137
    Lovely chap dangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    8,398
    Thanks
    412
    Thanked
    459 times in 334 posts
    • dangel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • See My Sig
      • CPU:
      • See My Sig
      • Memory:
      • See My Sig
      • Storage:
      • See My Sig
      • Graphics card(s):
      • See My Sig
      • PSU:
      • See My Sig
      • Case:
      • See My Sig
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • See My Sig
      • Internet:
      • 60mbit Sky LLU

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    How long does your machine take to boot though? 40 seconds?
    Not long enough for it to be an issue for me

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    On the whole hibernation front - to speed boot up times it is a bodge. From a keeping various apps open in the same state as you left them it is good.
    ...which is why it's there. Bloody handy for laptops as it uses zero battery. Hardly a bodge!


    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    I suppose when I'm saying that all "modern" OS's aren't as good - reletively speaking - for home users compared to what they once were is down to a few things:
    1. They take excessively long to boot
    ...because users want to use lots of hardware, and lots of software (with lots of features). You can't have it all (yet).

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    2. They are too resource hungry
    Well users will want silly things like a GUI or 3D graphics support. Bastards.

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    3. They over complicate things
    They changed to serve different needs thought - they got out of the bedroom and became a utilty for all the family. In other words, they got easier to use. And not just a "bit" either.

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    It comes down to the lazy short termism that was introduced to the market by Microsoft and IBM all of those years ago.
    Windows (now) has very little relation to Windows >then<
    (thankfully because it really did suck)

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    Did you know that until around 2002 - around 4 years after Windows update was rolled out, it was still completely stupid? If you didn't reboot the computer aftter each update was applied, you simply cound not guarentee they had installed properly. Then they finally worked out that before queuing a file to be changed on next reboot, the updates should check to see if another update had also queued the change and was in fact going to install a newer version of the file already.
    Lazy and dumb. For 4 years.
    ...and yes they don't get things right. Personally I hate Windows Installer with a passion for example - because it's flipping daft and flawed (witness: the cleanup tool MS produce for people stuck in the "can't install it, can't uninstall it" loop). I also hated guru meditations, or being stuck with a buggered startup-sequence.

    That said, for all the evil, there's a heck of a lot of good - my folks took to XP remarkably well. I don't think they'd have faired well with 16bit home computers.

    Build yourself a top-end SSD array

    Reality 1: Currently, my nVidia drivers take (up to) 15 seconds to 'wake up' on this PC. That's pathetic!
    Reality 2: Nothings perfect, at the time the Amiga was pretty close though
    Last edited by dangel; 08-08-2008 at 05:24 PM.
    Crosshair VIII Hero (WIFI), 3900x, 32GB DDR4, Many SSDs, EVGA FTW3 3090, Ethoo 719


  10. #138
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,945
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    388 times in 315 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by dangel View Post
    Reality 1: Currently, my nVidia drivers take (up to) 15 seconds to 'wake up' on this PC. That's pathetic!
    Reality 2: Nothings perfect, at the time the Amiga was pretty close though
    Closer than Vista is now or about the same? IMHO I'd say closer.
    That said, I do like Vista. Its complexity is for a reason. Its unbelieveably flexible.
    There's a lot of enterprise type stuff that Vista supports thats very powerful.
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  11. #139
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    The biggest factor slowing down boot time is the antiquated BIOS, Linux for e.g. can bootstrap all the hardware attached to a PC in a handful of seconds, coreboot, a F/OSS project which uses a stripped down Linux embedded in the flash rom where the BIOS resides can get to the bootloader in about a second on solid state media, a bit longer for HDDs since you have to wait for them to spin up. There's also initialisation systems for Linux that only takes a few more seconds to load all the base system services to get a desktop display manager up.

    Perhaps the only thing slowing the abandonment of the PC-BIOS is the people who also wont let Windows XP go.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  12. #140
    tsj
    tsj is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Wolverhampton, UK
    Posts
    138
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    I'm still running XP x64/Ubuntu on my desktop... and have no intention of switching over.

  13. #141
    Lovely chap dangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    8,398
    Thanks
    412
    Thanked
    459 times in 334 posts
    • dangel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • See My Sig
      • CPU:
      • See My Sig
      • Memory:
      • See My Sig
      • Storage:
      • See My Sig
      • Graphics card(s):
      • See My Sig
      • PSU:
      • See My Sig
      • Case:
      • See My Sig
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • See My Sig
      • Internet:
      • 60mbit Sky LLU

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    Closer than Vista is now or about the same? IMHO I'd say closer.
    If you were technically adept the Amiga was very powerful, otherwise you just slung the game disk in the drive
    Crosshair VIII Hero (WIFI), 3900x, 32GB DDR4, Many SSDs, EVGA FTW3 3090, Ethoo 719


  14. #142
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,039
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked
    3,379 times in 2,716 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    Looks like you both missed the point. Those are both over 10 year old OS's.
    What were other OS's doing 10 years ago? Windows 98.
    .
    .
    I predict a whole load of excuses as to why this is impossible for a modern operating system to do, but all it requires is a little thinking out of the box.
    Seems like you are missing my point. Computer usage now is different to 10 years ago. A modern OS on modern hardware is great for modern usage. At the end of the day that's all that's important.

  15. #143
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,945
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    388 times in 315 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by dangel View Post
    If you were technically adept the Amiga was very powerful, otherwise you just slung the game disk in the drive
    True, but there was also Dpaint!
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  16. #144
    Environ'mentalist Zadock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pembroke
    Posts
    1,386
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked
    101 times in 83 posts
    • Zadock's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z77
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Corsair Vengeance 8Gb (1600Mhz)
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 500GB HD501LJ Spinpoint T, SATA300, 7200 rpm
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX HD6950 2GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 520W HX Series Modular Powersupply
      • Case:
      • Antec Nine Hundred
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64 HP
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 27" LED
      • Internet:
      • BT

    Re: MS tricks die-hard XP users into liking Vista

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    True, but there was also Dpaint!
    Deluxe paint rocks! the guy on the unicycle on the front of the box looks like my dad!it was really easy to animate with it, which for an 11 year old boy was usually violent and extremely gory stick men massacre! many a mispent hour

    I also liked the text to speech programme in work bench, used to use it to insult my sister.

    I'm no expert but I would have to agree with Dangel's comments about amgia getting pretty close; the nice feature of the amiga of course was the operating environment was ROM based and you didn't need to run a OS before you could run a game, you effectively booted in to games.
    Last edited by Zadock; 11-08-2008 at 11:53 AM.

Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 678910 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Abit BE7 and Vista
    By tonymarcus in forum abit.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29-01-2007, 10:58 AM
  2. Windows Vista Hardware Tax
    By Matt1eD in forum Software
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 21-09-2005, 08:23 PM
  3. Die Hard
    By Rave in forum Consumer Electronics
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 12-04-2005, 07:32 PM
  4. Looking for a Database Programmer
    By tillyoubreakit in forum Software
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 25-04-2004, 05:00 PM
  5. Die Hard Vendetta PS2
    By Barakka in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-10-2003, 10:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •