Originally Posted by Ferral
hope springs eternal...
Either you wern't looking far enough ahead or you were too close to the vehicle in front. At 110 you should be paying attention you naughty boyOriginally Posted by Oakey
Tigs post is the most sensible one here imho.
It is not a question of what the speed limit is on a given road and whether you are over the limit. The question should be is it safe for me to be doing this speed given the circumstances (and my over inflated opinion of how good a driver I am. )
examples
1. Perfectly straight road, no traffic, no junctions, dry, excellent visablity, no pedestrians. 30mph speed limit. You're doing 60mph.
2. Motorway, rush hour, heavy fog and drizzle, poor visability and wet road. 70mph speed limit. You're doing 60mph.
3. Is it safe to do 30mph in a 30 zone when you are passing a school at chucking out time? You are well within the law to do so - BUT IS IT SAFE?
Going over the speed limit is not, imho, the be all and end all (coppers will disagree ). The correct speed for the circumstance is. You have to use your judgement. To get better judgement do an advanced driving course.
"Reality is what it is, not what you want it to be." Frank Zappa. ----------- "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." Huang Po.----------- "A drowsy line of wasted time bathes my open mind", - Ride.
I've told her umpteen times about knocking her speed down but its the old you dont drive line so I have give up, makes me nervous and cringe sometimes I must admit as I think its a bit reckless and unresponsible especially as we have a Focus Estate 1.6 Injection so due to the weight of the car alone the stopping distance is going to be a little more especially if its wet.
Extra 10 mph could be the difference between life and death of a child crossing the road when its dark in the wet. If it happened to one of our kids she would go absolutely nuts and really should take that stance when she is speeding, think of the consequences of her possible actions.
Why, would your grammer get even worse ?Originally Posted by mrs fraggie
Why don't you read back to yourself what you put down - it looks like a rant to me.Originally Posted by mrs fraggie
Because HEXUS is a community and likes to look out for its members , why else ?Originally Posted by mrs fraggie
I'm not trying to grind you down at all, but you will insist on trying to have the last word .I know from personal exiperience and a good few hundred thousand miles driving that agression has no place behind the wheel. It has cost me in the past and I'm trying pass on those pearls of wisdom , but it would appear that you know best. I think I'll leave it at that.Originally Posted by mrs fraggie
my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net
hrmm. inexperianced drivers do have a tendancy to be over-agressive
personally, i think they should have a 3 point limit during the first year or 2 (like it is 6 points now), so basically, 1 hit and your out. this would probably make lots of new drivers think before putting thier foot down.
as for yer missis mate - just refuse to get in the car with her if you dont feel safe, she might start to realise what she's doing.
hughlunnon@yahoo.com | I have sigs turned off..
She aint bothered mate unfortunately, tried that one and she just says you can get the bus then ! Tried all the lines in regards to trying to put it across, what if it was our kids ? Police are cracking down on speeding etc..
When she gets caught (it will happen, but at the moment she thinks it only happens to boy racers not normal members of the public) I hope I'm in the car with her and then I can say told you so. Or she will get caught on a speed camera she has no idea is there. I dont want to come across as being malicious towards her as I think the world of her but I know that if she carrys on doing what she is then someone could seriously get hurt or killed.
I agree with you on the 2 or 3 points for the first year, I think they should also lengthen the probabtion period up by 6 months or even a year (18 - 24 months) as you do get alot of new drivers where it goes to their heads as soon as they are out there on their own.
Speeding does have a place, and its normally to get past other drivers and back into safety without effecting anyone else on the road.
The places NOT to speed at all are where people are wandering about a lot. Simple fact is that housing estates and towns are loaded with kids, people, and pets.
Two things when you hit a person.
1: The person you hit is mammothly injured and very likely dead. This is bad
2: Your entire life, career and finacial life are wrecked for ever. You lose everything, and you often go to prison. You lose your job. Your insurance becomes vritually impossible and you can't sleep at night.
Speeding on certain roads, in my opinion, is quite ok. Why? Because I don't see why certain roads have the limits put on them that they have.
70 mph on a dual carriageway, with mopeds, pedal bikes, horses, hitchikers and people crossing the road is realtively safe, because on the whole it's still car drivers that hit other cars that are the majority of accidents (and therefore user error)
70mph on a 4 lane motor way, with none of the above mentioned hazards. How does that make sense?
Worse still, WHY is it still acceptable to pass a school at 30mph in some towns?
30mph in a cement mixer? I mean...please
Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
I don't think that's true. But it really depends how you do the math and define your terms to get the result you want.Originally Posted by 5lab
Do you calculate serious crashes per mile travelled? Per journey? Per number of vehicles on the road? Or ratio of crashes that are serious?
Do you do the old trick of lumping together deaths and serious injuries to make the stats seem more shocking (every ambulance callout+hospital visit is classed as a serious injury, even if nobody turns out to be hurt - I should know, it happened to me once. Nobody believed me when I said I wasn't hurt!)
Most road accidents involve only vehicles travelling under 30mph at time of impact. Usually at hazards, e.g. junctions.
I'm willing to bet that this is also true of road deaths. I'm talking about absolute numbers here, not some artificial calculation.
Next time you see a "fact" that suggests otherwise, double check exactly what is being claimed. See if they provide numbers to back up their claim, and whether those numbers are being interpreted correctly.
Accidents are caused by people doing stupid things, not just by exceeding an arbitrarily selected speed limit that covers an entire geographical area, with no distinction between different roads and conditions.
Legal speeds are not always safe.
Illegal speeds are not always dangerous.
Anybody who doesn't understand these simple facts cannot possibly know how to select a safe speed.
Last edited by rajagra; 30-09-2005 at 06:43 PM.
DFI LanParty UT NF4 SLI-D; AMD64 3500+ Winchester ;
2x XFX 6600GT ; Corsair XMS3200XLPRO TWINX 1GB;
Dell 2405FPW TFT.
grammer dont mean a thing these days aslong as long as you can read itWhy, would your grammer get even worse ?
atleast im using the space bar
i was telling you why i do it not having a rant, if it was a rant would of got added at some point
'quote' mrs f have a go... 'quote' mrs f have a go...I'm not trying to grind you down at all
now moby i no you hate me but can we stop this now please...
Kitty cat meoWWWW......ill take that kiss now...
Why exactly would I hate you ? Hate is a very strong word.now moby i no you hate me but can we stop this now please...
In the words of Micheal Winner , "calm down dear , its only an Internet Forum"
relax , you only think the world is out to get you. I however, am not
my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net
Originally Posted by Moby-Dick
huummmm you my dear are a (it says this in your pic) big fish... fish tends to upset my tummy :S *hugs and kisses moby to make up*
i hate that advert and would love to stuff it up his a***
Kitty cat meoWWWW......ill take that kiss now...
This time you've gone too far!
Mentioning Micheal Winner.....
I think you'll find that he's right - nsl roads are where most accidents happen iirc...Originally Posted by rajagra
nopeOriginally Posted by rajagra
you're part of the problemOriginally Posted by rajagra
true...Originally Posted by rajagra
select a safe speed? only if it's under the speed limit surely?Originally Posted by rajagra
That's right. We best all stick to what the unelected busybodys decide a road speed should be.Originally Posted by J4MES
I've got to admit that I do speed but not excesivly.
But one thing that really gets me is people with big or powerful cars with no idea on how to drive them properly.
Take the thread above for example. A 3 series BMW is a rear wheel drive car and so drives very differently to a front wheel drive car (especially at 100mph). And at those speeds you need traction control to keep the car under control which for the majority of models is an extra.
If you don't believe me, try excellerating hard from slow speeds round a wet bend in a front wheel drive car and then do it with a rear wheel drive car (with TC and ESC switched off if you have them) and see the difference.
A mate of mine had just bought a H-reg 323i and didn't believe me. He tried the little test above and nearly staked his BMW.
I think the biggest problem is not just people thinking they are safe drivers but not knowing what their car is / is not capable of in it's current condition.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)