scaryjim (18-11-2014)
And quad-channel DDR4, presumably? Sounds good to me - way better than the nasty 960G northbridges we're currently having to put up with if we want 8 cores and onboard graphics....
EDIT:
Wonder if we should start talking to AMD's semi-custom business? Create our own line of CPUs. Think they'll work on a commission only basis?
scaryjim (18-11-2014)
I find it hard to believe something like an 8C, 128SP processor wouldn't sell well enough to at least offset the costs of producing it, and I would've thought it would be good for brand image.
However it seems AMD is just being persistent in trying to bootstrap the APU/HSA market with their current strategy?
Sounds to me like we need to put together a HEXUS consortium...
Hmmm,
Desktop PC needs and upgrade... possible understatement as it's at atom 330 with 1 gig of ram.
So the question is..
Althlon 5350 + itx board + 4gig
or.
A8-7600 + itx board + 8 gig.
Anyone know the cheapest itx board that supports the A8 in 45w mode?
Depends on the final utilisation but I would say the A8 7600 plus AsRock FM2A88X-ITX plus the 8GB of RAM (the MoBo should't have problems with the 45W mode as it was used in the following review: http://www.legitreviews.com/amd-kave...-review_147879).
It runs a pc based oscilloscope and logic analyzer + basic office/browsing.
The current machine is fine up to the point that browsers have got slower and slower over the years and I quite fancy playing a few games too. Not really modern stuff but quite fancy playing DS1/DS2 and neverwinter nights again.
I used to play NWN on a 1.3GHz dual core Core 2 and Intel G45 graphics (can't remember what the actual IGP was called it but it was pretty poor ) so either would cope with that fine. The A8 will obviously give you more longevity and overall better performance, so really it's a question of whether you're happy spending the extra money.
Naaaah. More IPC with the 4 cores (maybe the L3 cache can help there) and 128-256MB Stacked huge bandwidth, ultra low latency RAM
Suspect what will actually happen is better performance at low power, barely changed performance at higher power, no stacked RAM and DDR3 (possibly DDR3/DDR4)
Why oh why do you strangle your APU's AMD!
It's like asking Mo Farah to run when breathing through a straw!
"In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."
It appears a supercomputer powerered by FirePro S9150 compute cards is now top of the Green500 list:
http://www.sys-con.com/node/3237476
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/amd...k=MW_news_stmp
A10-7700K discontinued:
http://www.kitguru.net/components/cp...nue-a10-7700k/
Carrizo and Carrizo-L announced:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8742/a...us-for-h1-2015
http://techreport.com/news/27392/amd...eema-successor
So quite a while for actual systems though.In an accompanying press release, AMD indicates that the first systems won't be available until "mid-year 2015."
It supports DX12.. A video by AMD’s VP/GM for Computing and Graphics, John Byrne, states that Carrizo and Carrizo-L are currently being tested internally ready for a 1H 2015 release, along with support for DirectX 12, OpenCL 2.0, Mantle and Freesync.
It seems that the next APUs will suppport memory bandwidth compression.CN 1.2's lossless delta color compression algorithms help improve the performance in memory bandwidth limited scenarios, such as in APUs.
However people doubted me about what GPU changes AMD would make in one thread:
One example of the efficiency improvement was provided by AMD’s Voltage Adaptive Operation. Rather than compensate for voltage variations which wastes energy, this technology takes the average operating voltage and detects when the voltage increases beyond a smaller margin. To compensate for this increase, the CPU speed is reduced until the voltage drops below the threshold and then the CPU speed is moved back up.
The changes in speed are designed to be so minute that it does not affect overall performance, however it might only take an errant voltage delivery component to consistently make the voltage go above that threshold, causing erratic slowdown that might be statistically significant. It will be interesting to see how AMD implements the latest version of this feature.
There are currently 74 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 74 guests)