Once more unto the breach, dear friends...
Indeed. Like I say, it wasn't your statement that you preferred Sega over Nintendo that I thought was in need of discussion, more your claims that no other company has come close to Sega's quality of games.Originally posted by Rave
Well, let's see what I can say here. Trying to argue that Sega are better than Nintendo (or vice versa) is like arguing that apples are better than oranges really.
I think both Nintendo and Sony have done rather more than come close, Nintendo in particular. After all, despite the Arcade pedigree of Sega, and the Sonic's, Wonder Boy's, Alex Kids, etc, Sega are no long making consoles, where as Sony and Nintendo are still going strong.
Hmm, well, if you've never owned one, then maybe this explains why you don't consider them as good as Sega's machines.As for Nintendo, I've never owned a Nintendo console- I've played them at friends houses and never been tempted to buy one (although see end of post).
Pick up an old SNES and 10 or so good games, and I'm sure you will see Mario, Zelda, Donkey Kong, F-Zero and all the other Nintendo games, for the classics they are. You may then see why Super Mario Bros. 3 sold an utterly amazing amount of units.
It is a silly statement, to be honest, in my opinion. No offence, and all that.Hmm, well we're back to total subjectivity here. Perhaps that is a bit of a silly thing to say, but from my perspective I much prefer Sega's console games to Nintendo's, and they have an impeccable arcade record as well, so for me they're the clear winner.
Nintendo have Super Mario, Zelda, Donkey Kong, Mario Kart, and a whole heap of classics, they have genius games designers like Myiamoto, they have in the shape of Super Mario, the worlds most recognised games mascot, and they are still making consoles, unlike Sega, and have a history of churning out classic, after classic, after classic. Despite this, you say (without ever having owned a Nintendo console) that Sega somehow emerge as the 'clear winner'.
Maybe there is enough to go on, to say you prefer Sega over Nintendo, but there really is no case for saying Sega is a clear winner. On what basis are they the winner in any respect, let alone the clear winner?
I'll give you an example of what I mean. A while ago, well respected gaming website IGN, did a 'Top 100 Games Of All Time' article, where they went through every game they had played, console or PC, and compiled them into a ranking list.
Here is the top 5 in reverse order:
#5: Super Mario 64
Platform: Nintendo 64
Developer: EAD, Nintendo
Publisher: Nintendo
Year Released: 1996
#4: Tetris
Platform: various
Developer: Alexey Pajitnov
Publisher: various
Year Released: 1987
-- I've left this one as it is, but when I think of Tetris, I think of the Nintendo Gameboy.
#3: Super Metroid
Platform: Super NES
Developer: Nintendo
Publisher: Nintendo
Year Released: 1994
#2: Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
Platform: Nintendo 64, Nintendo GameCube
Developer: Nintendo EAD
Publisher: Nintendo
Year Released: 1998
#1: Super Mario Bros.
Platform: Arcade, Nintendo Entertainment System
Developer: EAD, Nintendo
Publisher: Nintendo
Year Released: 1985
Again, looking at that list, I see little evidence that Sega have emerged as the clear winner. I see little evidence that Sega have won anything, to be honest. Like I say, I have no problem with you liking Sega over Nintendo; Sega are a quality outfit, who have published many great games, and have an unmatched Arcade pedigree.
Saying, however, that Sega are the clear winner, when really, all the evidence points to Nintendo having the edge, and then saying that you've never even owned a Nintendo console is, perhaps, more worthy of discussion.
Maybe you can expand a bit more, on your reasons for coming to the conclusion that Sega are the clear winner.
Oh, by the way, the rest of the Top 10 was made up of 2 PC games, 2 more Nintendo games (Final Fantasy II and another Zelda classic), and Street Fighter II turbo, who’s first and best home version, arrived on the SNES.
As far as I could tell, the first exclusive Sega platform game was ‘NHL ‘94’ in 16th position, and the highest placed Sega developed game was… well, I stopped looking in the mid 30s, and didn’t see one (Passed another 10 or so Nintendo games though).
Harsh, but again, this shows just how dominant Nintendo are when in comes to sheer quality of game play, and fun factor. I’m not that surprised, to be honest, I mean, Alex Kidd games are good, but comparable to Mario games? Not in the slightest. Only Sonic comes close to the gallery of Nintendo created stars.
Where did Sonic the Hedgehog, the classic Genesis original place? 90th. Although, I admit that this is very harsh, Sonic should be in the top 20 or so.
Well, fair enough, but to be honest, almost everyone else does. I do, and I also ‘get’ Sonic as well. Why can you only ‘get’ something, if it has Sega written on it?Yeah, but I just don't really get Super Mario.
As for your other points – yes, no contest really between a GBA and a Neo-Geo pocket.
Street Fighter did indeed come out for the Mega Drive, and was a half-way decent port.
And yes – of the 3 major consoles at the moment, the Cube is the better choice. Game quality is where it’s at.
Your turn.