Is the neutrality here on Hexus starting to become threatened??

[Disturbedguy]

why would the reps not spout biased drivel ?

Reps generally back up what they with some form of facts, *most* fanbois dont.

[Stoo]

why would the reps not spout biased drivel ?

ahem, marketing information..




On a more serious note, yep, we're totally neutral, as long as it's not spam, or offensive etc, all opinions are welcome as long as they can be discussed in a relatively adult manner

What we don't want are pointless flame-wars, or personal attacks, and you bunch, for the most part, are pretty damned good at following the guidelines we set out

[CAT-THE-FIFTH]

why would the reps not spout biased drivel ?

The difference is that it is officially sanctioned biased drivel (tm)!!

Also reps are more professional in the way they argue their points out too. Fanbois are anything but professional.

[MadduckUK]

and yet today is the day we get the nvidia cartoons.. "officially sanctioned biased drivel(tm)!!" is right

[nightkhaos]

I wouldn't worry about. The fanbois you refer to seem to post one comment then disappear, never to post again. Those that stay quickly learn the rules, and that we don't take unhelpful, unresearched, and biased opionions to sway without retorting and a complete point by point rebuke.

What I find healthy is that these point by point rebukes are given to annoying who talks out of there arse. If I hadn't shot down Lars in a point by point rebuke in that thread, I'm sure someone else would have.

[Stoo]

Yep, reasoned debates are exactly what we want, pointless fanboy rantings are tiresome and rarely contribute anything.

Put a proper, blow-by-blow reasoned argument together, and we might just all learn something

Expand your minds people!

[nightkhaos]

Yep, reasoned debates are exactly what we want, pointless fanboy rantings are tiresome and rarely contribute anything.

Put a proper, blow-by-blow reasoned argument together, and we might just all learn something

Expand your minds people!

I notice fanbois can put together a blow by blow arguement against you, but unforunately they can't roll with the punches and take as good as they give. It's annoying sometimes. You take there points on the check, and they competely ignore yours, sometimes to the point of using an argumentum ad hominem tu quoque against you, which is my pet hate with arguements.

[CAT-THE-FIFTH]

[MadduckUK]

You take there points on the check, and they competely ignore yours, sometimes to the point of using an argumentum ad hominem tu quoque against you, which is my pet hate with arguements.

pfft, well if you didn't do it so much..

[nightkhaos]

pfft, well if you didn't do it so much..

What, so leave a glaring inconsistant fact with no basis in reality unchallenged?

It's unthinkable! How could you suggest such a thing?!

[MadduckUK]

What, so leave a glaring inconsistant fact with no basis in reality unchallenged?

It's unthinkable! How could you suggest such a thing?!

doesn't matter

[Main]

What, so leave a glaring inconsistant fact with no basis in reality unchallenged?

It's unthinkable! How could you suggest such a thing?!

[nightkhaos]

doesn't matter

Glad you agree.

I apologise. I think there was a joke somewhere in your post, but I missed it, or drew the wrong end of the stick...

[MadduckUK]

i used an ad hominem against your dislike of ad hominem's. the moment has gone now though

[Funkstar]

Damn! I was going to post that!

[nightkhaos]

i used an ad hominem against your dislike of ad hominem's. the moment has gone now though

Ahh so I had got it right! That's what I read from it... and no one got my retort either. *feels small*