So have I. And right now, I am living in a country rather notorious for it's suicide rate.
If we look at the figures (
http://www.who.int/mental_health/pre...icide_rates/en) suicide rates in India (I am going with your assumptions) is about 50-60% (lazy maths) higher than in the UK, though incidentally lower than the US. Still, looking on the women side column, it is admittedly on the high side by world standard, a whooping 2.6x higher than in the UK. Significant.
Yet in absolute terms, that is 7.8 suicides per 100,000 per year. I can't imagine there being no more than 15.6/100,000 each year who haven't had equivalently stressful experience who decided to carry on living.
Hence I stand by that the averagely stable person would not kill themselves over this (as the sole reason). I'll go a step further and say that even someone on the edge may do all sort of things they might regret later, or contemplate and even plan for suicide.. but not carry it out. Our sense of self-preservation takes a lot to get overwritten. Like I said, suicide rates would be measured in whole percentage otherwise.
I also have doubt the "less" being the sole reason people kill themselves. It might be that the *identified* cause linked to the suicide is (subjectively) less, but there could be a combination of other factors too. Furthermore, if we start looking, I am sure we can also find people who have killed themselves over "less" in Western countries. Social pressure may play a significant role, to the extent that it increases the likelihood of suicide by several times (or more depending on the countries compared) but the actual consequence will only emerge if you are already far past the edge.
All this, of course being my opinion.