Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 24 of 24

Thread: Disappointed with Scan Sure/Sandy bridge service

  1. #17
    HEXUS.social member Disturbedguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    5,134
    Thanks
    844
    Thanked
    489 times in 360 posts
    • Disturbedguy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Rog Strix Z370-H Gaming
      • CPU:
      • i7 8700K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair something or other
      • Storage:
      • 1 x Samsung 960 EVO (250GB) 1 x Samsung 850 EVO (500GB)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 1080Ti
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate
      • Monitor(s):
      • 32inch Samsung TV
      • Internet:
      • Crap

    Re: Disappointed with Scan Sure/Sandy bridge service

    Quote Originally Posted by exobuzz View Post
    And I was in hope a company I had just spent £500 with, could try and meet me halfway, or even give a small discount on a new policy as a gesture of goodwill. We could have been talking a couple of quid. Now I'll just take my money elsewhere.

    [edit]
    To add, for people visiting this thread (it has quite a good google rank) - it is worth taking into consideration the extra cost of additional scansure insurance for a rebuild if a piece of hardware fails after you have installed it and outside of the 28 days.

    I think it would be a good idea for scan to look into extending cover for the cases where a hardware item fails and needs rebuilding or rethink the policy a bit. If an item failed multiple times through no fault of the customer, it is unfair that they would need to keep buying new cover from no mistake of their own - in fact the current policy actually favours hardware failure!. Right now, I don't feel that scansure offers the peace of mind it claims to.
    Your issue is completely different though.

    Scansure covers accidental damage, not if a product is defective through manufacturying. Scansure will be honored if an item is damaged accidentally, in this case, it isnt.
    Quote Originally Posted by TAKTAK View Post
    It didn't fall off, it merely became insufficient at it's purpose and got a bit droopy...

  2. #18
    Retail Sales Manager Chris P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,699
    Thanks
    767
    Thanked
    515 times in 411 posts

    Re: Disappointed with Scan Sure/Sandy bridge service

    I think it would be a good idea for scan to look into extending cover for the cases where a hardware item fails and needs rebuilding or rethink the policy a bit. If an item failed multiple times through no fault of the customer, it is unfair that they would need to keep buying new cover from no mistake of their own - in fact the current policy actually favours hardware failure!. Right now, I don't feel that scansure offers the peace of mind it claims to.
    Scansure was not launched to cover hardware failure and does not cover hardware failure. Hardware failure is covered by the product warranty.

  3. #19
    ALT0153™ Rob_B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    6,872
    Thanks
    487
    Thanked
    1,124 times in 727 posts

    Re: Disappointed with Scan Sure/Sandy bridge service

    Quote Originally Posted by Disturbedguy View Post
    Your issue is completely different though.

    Scansure covers accidental damage, not if a product is defective through manufacturying. Scansure will be honored if an item is damaged accidentally, in this case, it isnt.
    I'd say it's relevant though.

    Exobuzz's issue is that, through no fault of his own, he needs to reinstall hardware meaning a risk of damaging it, he already paid for scansure when first buying it which is fair enough as he's had that coverage.

    Now however the risk is totally his problem if he damages the 2nd motherboard even though the only reason it needs replacing is due to a manufacturing defect. I don't even know if Scan would let you buy scansure for a replacement part or only when you buy new?

    It's certainly something to consider in the event of an RMA in the future.

  4. #20
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    1,478
    Thanks
    168
    Thanked
    90 times in 74 posts

    Re: Disappointed with Scan Sure/Sandy bridge service

    ScanSure can only be purchased with a new sale and not with replacements issued under warranty / RMA.

  5. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Disappointed with Scan Sure/Sandy bridge service

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris P View Post
    Scansure was not launched to cover hardware failure and does not cover hardware failure. Hardware failure is covered by the product warranty.
    Sure, but there is a crossover with this, as I have already illustrated. Someone protects themselves with scansure only for the hardware to fail after they have built it meaning, they are forced to build it all again with a replacement part and either take a risk or purchase scansure again. if the hardware fails, it is in scans interest currently, as the customer may well be likely to purchase scansure again for the replacement part.

    [edit] for which I just read isn't available anyway for replacements under warranty. so there is no way of protecting yourself for the second build at all. I suppose if any good came out of this, it's that the info is here for people to see.

  6. #22
    ALT0153™ Rob_B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    6,872
    Thanks
    487
    Thanked
    1,124 times in 727 posts

    Re: Disappointed with Scan Sure/Sandy bridge service

    Quote Originally Posted by wesleyaldred View Post
    ScanSure can only be purchased with a new sale and not with replacements issued under warranty / RMA.
    Interesting, not that I'd ever purchase it myself but are you looking to offer that? Someone buying it in the first place would likely want it again as not everyone is confident with builds.

    Isn't it only about £2-odd for a motherboard?...

  7. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Disappointed with Scan Sure/Sandy bridge service

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob_B View Post
    Interesting, not that I'd ever purchase it myself but are you looking to offer that? Someone buying it in the first place would likely want it again as not everyone is confident with builds.

    Isn't it only about £2-odd for a motherboard?...
    they would probably also want the other components included in the insurance too, even those not replaced under warranty. I guess this is showing up the limitations of something like scansure, and cases where it would become complex.

  8. #24
    Does he need a reason? Funkstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    19,874
    Thanks
    629
    Thanked
    962 times in 813 posts
    • Funkstar's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core2Quad Q9550 (2.83GHz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB OCZ PC2-6400C5 800MHz Quad Channel
      • Storage:
      • 650GB Western Digital Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 512MB ATI Radeon HD4550
      • PSU:
      • Antec 350W 80+ Efficient PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec NSK1480 Slim Mini Desktop Case
      • Operating System:
      • Vista Ultimate 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407 + 2408 monitors
      • Internet:
      • Zen 8mb

    Re: Disappointed with Scan Sure/Sandy bridge service

    Quote Originally Posted by exobuzz View Post
    they would probably also want the other components included in the insurance too, even those not replaced under warranty. I guess this is showing up the limitations of something like scansure, and cases where it would become complex.
    Any insurance has limitations.

    Look at it this way, at least you were able to purchase ScanSure in the first place for the first time you built your machine. Before ScanSure was launched, you wouldn't have been able to do that.

    If Scan were able to negotiate with their insurers to cover edge cases like this, I would suspect insurance for everyone would have to go up and it is increasing complexity and probably raising risk levels. Just like components valued over £500 cannot be insured, even though those are perhaps the components you are most likely to want insurance on.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. [Resolved] Customer service from Scan in 21 steps
    By brownn in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS :: After sales support
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 18-11-2010, 02:08 PM
  2. Very disappointed and upset with Scan
    By sandygws in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 27-09-2009, 10:34 PM
  3. So disappointed with Scan service!
    By akaneria in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 05-06-2008, 09:13 AM
  4. Disapointed with Scan
    By phild71 in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 13-12-2007, 01:36 PM
  5. New Windows Updates out peeps
    By Skii in forum Software
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-08-2004, 06:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •